SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

TECH

ANALYSIS: Why has Sweden’s digital response to Covid-19 been so slow?

Sweden is one of the world's top tech nations, with Stockholm second only to Silicon Valley in the number of $1 billion startups per capita. So why has the country lagged behind when it comes to its digital response to Covid-19?

ANALYSIS: Why has Sweden's digital response to Covid-19 been so slow?
A guard checks a fan's vaccination pass at an ice hockey game in Luleå. Photo: Pär Bäckström/TT

In 2021, Sweden was ranked the third most advanced digital economy in the EU, behind only Denmark and Finland. But in many ways it has also fallen behind its European neighbours during the pandemic, with several tech solutions introduced much later or not at all.

It is, for example, one of only four countries in the EU never to have launched an official contact tracing app. The others are Bulgaria, Romania and Slovakia.

So why is tech-savvy Sweden lagging behind?

A lot of the problems have been political rather than technological.

Sweden’s Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB) spent six million kronor (approximately $662,000) developing a contact tracing app in April 2020, but failed to clear it with the Public Health Agency, which then vetoed it the following month. And so, the app was never launched.

At the time, state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell argued Sweden had “too much infection”, so a contact tracing app would overwhelm health services and force too many necessary workers to stay home. MSB said that “uncertainties around data storage and users’ anonymity and privacy” had also been an issue.

A source who was involved in the early stages of the aborted contact tracing app argues that the resistance to digital solutions follows a pattern seen throughout the pandemic.

“They were very sceptical of how efficient contact tracing apps were, and I think it’s in line with a lot of other perspectives during the crisis,” he tells The Local. “It’s the same with the masks: ‘without a systematic scientific evaluation, we cannot recommend anything’.”

What about vaccine passes?

The slow response also extends to Covid vaccine passes, with thousands of fully vaccinated foreigners still unable to get their vaccinations validated in Sweden.

When Sweden first launched its version of the EU Digital Covid Certificate, Covidbevis, it came as a simple PDF (online or print) with no accompanying app, and it was only available on July 1st, the absolute deadline and long after many other EU countries.

At first the Swedish version of the Covid pass could only show vaccination status. It wasn’t until the start of August, when most people’s holidays were over, that Swedes could get an EU Digital Covid Certificate on the back of a negative test or proof of recovery. Again, this was right on deadline and months after most other EU countries.

The Public Health Agency was initially sceptical of the value of vaccine passes, and at the time the certificates were only used for travelling to Sweden from abroad without restrictions. When countries like France, Germany and Denmark started to also require them to enter restaurants and events, Tegnell argued this was ethically problematic as many people had not had a chance to get the jab.

Denmark launched its coronapas vaccine verification app in April 2021. Photo: Johan Nilsson/TT

Sweden eventually rolled out vaccine passes to large public events on December 1st, and the government is now preparing to possibly extend them to venues such as restaurants and long-distance public transport. It also tasked the Agency for Digital Development (DIGG) with developing a new vaccine app that event organisers can use to verify their attendees’ vaccinations.

“It’s not like we were late with developing something,” protests Mats Snäll, who led the work on the app, which was ready on November 30th.

His 20-person team did the job in two and a half weeks, he adds. “We developed this app when the government told us to, and they thought it was a good idea now and not earlier. It is not the most beautiful app in the world. But I think it suits its purpose.”

In fact, his team also developed a system for verifying test status and recovery from Covid back in July, so the fact that the app lacks this capability reflects a decision from the Public Health Agency to focus on vaccine passes, not a technological limitation.

Sweden’s Health Minister Lena Hallengren and the Public Health Agency’s director-general Karin Tegmark Wisell at a press conference about the Covid-19 pandemic. Photo: Jessica Gow/TT

The decentralised digital approach

Blame for Sweden’s slow digital response cannot solely be laid at the door of the Public Health Agency. Sweden’s decentralised approach, with every municipality, region and government agency responsible for their own digitisation, is arguably a big culprit.

Denmark’s version of DIGG, the Agency for Digitisation, was launched in 2011 with some 300 staff and a powerful mandate. DIGG was launched in 2018, has only a third as many employees for a country with twice the population, and has no powers to impose its solutions on agencies or local governments.

“They’ve made the right decision,” Johan Magnusson, professor of applied information technology at Gothenburg University, says of the Danish approach.

“They’ve created somebody in charge and made sure that there’s enough funding to be able to create not 290 individual solutions out in the country, but just one. They utilise the logic of digital: massive economies of scale and zero margin cost,” he adds.

That Sweden hasn’t done this, he argues, reflects the “Swedish government model”, which leaves agencies and regions responsible for day-to-day decisions and frowns on ministerstyre, “ministerial rule”, when ministers micromanage government agencies.

It was this fragmentation that arguably led to the clash between MSB and the Public Health Agency over the contact tracing app. It is arguably the reason why DIGG could not take its own initiative and launch a vaccine pass app before it was asked to by the government. It also part explains the issues faced by those foreigners who are unable to get a valid vaccine certificate, despite being fully vaccinated.

A man showing his vaccine pass at a cinema in Stockholm. Photo: Christine Olsson/TT

As The Local has been reporting since summer, people who got both of their vaccine doses abroad or who don’t have a personal identity number (personnummer) have faced obstacles or even been unable to get a Swedish vaccine pass. Although Sweden is hardly the only EU country where non-residents have encountered problems, it is a hurdle that was cleared in many other countries long ago.

The e-Health Agency, which has been in charge of issuing Covid certificates, told The Local in July that the problem faced by those who don’t have a personnummer came down to difficulties connecting the population registry databases and vaccinations.

The situation was resolved for some of these people in autumn, but for people vaccinated with a temporary reserve number, it is more complex, as reserve numbers are only unique by each region, so vaccinations can’t be matched up to a person and their name on a national level. The Health Ministry told The Local in November that they plan to roll out a solution on January 1st, six months after the passes were launched.

Swedish residents vaccinated abroad have also been unable to get their foreign vaccine certificate converted to a valid Swedish vaccine pass. This problem is due to the set-up of the National Vaccination Register (NVR), which is managed by the Public Health Agency.

“Denmark has had a national vaccination repository for several years [which] can also handle information about vaccinations done in other countries,” explains Jan Pettersson, a communications officer at the e-Health Agency.

“The Swedish national vaccination registry is a health data registry governed by a different type of legislation, which contains only certain vaccinations done in Sweden, and the information can only be used for statistics and research.”

It took a change in legislation to enable the registry even to be used for the Covid-19 passes, he adds. The registry can still not be accessed by regional health authorities for anything other than statistical purposes, which explains some of the administrative issues above.

It’s not that Sweden isn’t aware. The e-Health Agency and the Public Health Agency as early as June 2020 proposed a move to a Danish-style system, which would allow doctors employed with regional health agencies to manually add vaccination data. The next step now is for the Health Ministry to decide which government agency will be responsible for verifying vaccinations administered in third countries.

Several legal quirks keep health officials from accessing Sweden’s National Vaccination Register. Photo: Stina Stjernkvist/TT

Constitutional changes?

Gothenburg University’s Magnusson argues that overcoming some of the barriers to digital government thrown into sharp relief by the pandemic will require carving out exceptions to Sweden’s decentralised system set up by Lord High Chancellor Axel Oxenstierna in the 17th century, something he says Finland, which has a similar system, is already working on.

“It’s a major problem that there’s no central authority, so you find everybody running in the wrong direction at once,” he explains. “But to change it, you need to change the constitution, and that’s something no government has been willing to do.”

Member comments

  1. Thank goodness Sweden did not introduce a test and trace programe, has a decentralised system of government (albeit one requiring a centralised auditor general’s office to audit government expenditure at all levels of government and ensure national legislation is adhered to) and a consitution that kept politicians at arms length in the handling of Covid. As Richard Orange must know, test and trace in the UK had been a horrendously expensive disaster according to the Public Accounts Committe of MPs (£37 billion at last count), and the UK’s heavily centralised National Health Service has proven itself to be incapable of orchestrating a coherent response to the pandemic. To adapt Ruyard Kipling “Anders Tegnall kept his head when all about him were losing theirs” and thank goodness for Sweden he did. He should be awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine. If other European countries had followed Sweden’s approach Europe’s death rate from Covid would have been much much lower. Hundreds of thousands of lives would have been saved. Only Iceland did better. See https://qap.ecdc.europa.eu/public/extensions/COVID-19/COVID-19.html#eu-eea-daily-tab

    1. Really? How do you explain that the death rate in Denmark is about 3x less than Sweden? Tegnell is the one who praised the swine flu vaccine, causing some 500 children having narcolepsy to save few hundred people. Which would be just a mishap if the UK and the US had not prohibited the use of that vaccine judging it too risky. So let’s celebrate his original thinking. When everyone was advising about using masks he said no, because, amidst a pandemic emergency, he was waiting for some peer reviewed article to prove they work. Whereas a bit of common sense would dictate to prove that they are dangerous or even amplify the spread of the disease. No, wash your hands, stay home with symptoms, which is a stroke of genius when we all know that C-19 is an airborne disease and that a third of the cases go asymptomatic. With covid he’s experimenting his latest original idea: a sort of herd immunity in disguise, but all seem happy with “the genius”, after all the way people behave is just the result of FHM and Government initial narrative and the fact that noboday looks outside their countries (true everywhere). I argue that with a bit more of attention, and looking at what other countries are doing, maybe cherry-picking the best actions, and with not such a spineless government, several fragile lives could have been saved. Since you quote Rudyard Kipling, let’s say that he could have the Nobel Prize for Medicine “IF” he was a scientist. You praise decentralisation, however the vaccination program is not particularly handsome isn’t it? They are also stingy with information: the FHM page (indigestible on purpose) has NO info on the 3rd dose progress, but if you find it I am happy to be disproved. You can have ONE running point on ourworldindata, whereas every other country give you a full graph from September, day by day. No, Sweden is one point that is adjourned every week or so, if you are lucky: previous history is cancelled, so no way to make a projection into the future! Info on newspaper is pathetic: easier to find what Carola will put on her julbord this year. Scarce mentions on Omicron, and what to do about it. The beast has a 24 doubling rate in the UK and the US, and all point at the necessity of a third dose ASAP. As of today we vaccinated 14.4% of the population with the booster. Now they open to 60+ … in Italy they are doing 50+, UK even more advanced. Do you think that Swedes have special genes or simply tests are not done in large enough numbers? I am so concerned for my wife who needs to travel for work, spending 5 hrs there and back surrounded by people who don’t give a toss to protect themselves because “the genius” is experimenting his theories. Tegnell Nobel for Medicine would have made my day if this matter was not too serious not to be seriously worried about it.

    2. Test and Tracing in many countries Worked very well. A good example is Singapore with like 5.5 million population and rather dense. If it was horrendous in UK, we also have to realize their population of 66 million and the density. Sweden has neither a large population, nor is it dense but more spread out. Track and trace would have worked well, and possibly helped save a few thousand lives with this cautionary measure…. but of course other cautionary measure are also very necessary like Face masks in public indoor areas.

  2. I am a French resident. I come to Sweden on a regular basis for months at a time to visit family. I was double vaccinated in France, and received my third, the booster, here in Stockholm. I needed to get this because I was informed by the French health service, which has a really good app and really good digital communications, that since I was 7 months out from the second vaccination snd at my age, over 65, I needed the booster. Now I wished I had delayed since it is such a problem to get the certification. I cannot hope to return to France without this proof. First I had to get a coordination number. Then I had to send it with a form to Covidbevis. Now apparently I have to wait weeks and weeks because there is such a backlog of people like me. This is shockingly bad and so easy to rectify and should shame Sweden. In fact Sweden’s response overall to the pandemic continues to be woeful. Compared to other Nordic countries it has failed. Tegnell should be sacked. The government should stop passing the buck. Get a grip, Sweden.

  3. As a resident of Sweden for a short period of time, although a passport holder for 12-13 years I am extremely glad that we had Anders Tegnall. We have now experienced less Covid folk than other countries. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

    1. Whatever you are smoking is affecting your reasoning. Sweden’s response has been woeful and it has admitted that. Deaths per million Sweden = 1490; compare Denmark = 522; Norway = 219; Finland 260. Sweden’s poor showing is clear.

  4. The Swedish “covid strategy” sucked and still sucks, because for some very weird reason, we have a “dictator” in Anders Tegnell.
    Why oh why does just ONE man, who has proved over and over and over again that he knows nothing, have the say?
    This Pandemic has shown the to the world, how bad the system is in Sweden. The past good reputation has gone to the dogs.
    But I think Sweden is just too arrogant and adamant to admit failure.
    They think by doing “sneaky” things, eg when they stopped testing people with symptoms a few months ago, it was to show the world and the population here that ” we are the best ” as the statistics showed Sweden to be the “lowest” rate of infection when that was so untrue – to make it seem like the “no strategy, stragegy” was the best in the world.
    Is this the Democracy they brag about?

    1. I, too, have been surprised, and disappointed by Sweden’s approach. But, I think it is more like complacency than arrogance. Tegnel may well be arrogant, but it is complacency among the citizens that permits all this. At least there are more people wearing masks on public transport, but really not nearly enough. Its ‘save yourself’ time on this ship.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

EES PASSPORT CHECKS

How will the new app for Europe’s EES border system work?

With Europe set to introduce its new Entry/Exit biometric border system (EES) in the autumn there has been much talk about the importance of a new app designed to help avoid delays. But how will it work and when will it be ready?

How will the new app for Europe's EES border system work?

When it comes into force the EU’s new digital border system known as EES will register the millions of annual entries and exits of non-EU citizens travelling to the EU/Schengen area, which will cover 29 European countries.

Under the EU Entry/Exit System (EES), non-EU residents who do not require a visa will have to register their biometric data in a database that will also capture each time they cross an external Schengen border.

Passports will no longer be manually stamped, but will be scanned. However, biometric data such as fingerprints and facial images will have to be registered in front of a guard when the non-EU traveller first crosses in to the EU/Schengen area.

Naturally there are concerns the extra time needed for this initial registration will cause long queues and tailbacks at the border.

To help alleviate those likely queues and prevent the subsequent frustration felt by travellers the EU is developing a new smartphone app.

READ ALSO: What will the EES passport system mean for foreigners living in Europe?

The importance of having a working app was summed up by Uku Särekanno, Deputy Executive Director of the EU border agency Frontex in a recent interview.

“Initially, the challenge with the EES will come down to the fact that travellers arriving in Europe will have to have their biographic and biometric data registered in the system – border guards will have to register four of their fingerprints and their facial image. This process will take time, and every second really matters at border crossing points – nobody wants to be stuck in a lengthy queue after a long trip.”

But there is confusion around what the app will actually be able to do, if it will help avoid delays and importantly when will it be available?

So here’s what we know so far.

Who is developing the app?

The EU border agency Frontex is currently developing the app. More precisely, Frontex is developing the back-end part of the app, which will be made available to Schengen countries.

“Frontex is currently developing a prototype of an app that will help speed up this process and allow travellers to share some of the information in advance. This is something we are working on to support the member states, although there is no legal requirement for us to do so,” Uku Särekanno said in the interview.

Will the 29 EES countries be forced to use the app?

No, it is understood that Frontex will make the app available on a voluntary basis. Each government will then decide if, when and where to use it, and develop the front-end part based on its own needs.

This point emerged at a meeting of the House of Commons European scrutiny committee, which is carrying out an inquiry on how EES will impact the UK.

What data will be registered via the app?

The Local asked the European Commission about this. A spokesperson however, said the Commission was not “in a position to disclose further information at this stage” but that travellers’ personal data “will be processed in compliance with the high data security and data protection standards set by EU legislation.”

According to the blog by Matthias Monroy, editor of the German civil rights journal Bürgerrechte & Polizei/CILIP the Frontex app will collect passengers’ name, date of birth, passport number, planned destination and length of stay, reason for travelling, the amount of cash they carry, the availability of a credit card and of a travel health insurance. The app could also allow to take facial images. It will then generate a QR code that travellers can present at border control.

This, however, does not change the fact that fingerprints and facial images will have to be registered in front of a guard at the first crossing into the Schengen area.

So given the need to register finger prints and facial images with a border guard, the question is how and if the app will help avoid those border queues?

When is the app going to be available?

The answer to perhaps the most important question is still unclear.

The Commissions spokesperson told The Local that the app “will be made available for Schengen countries as from the Entry/Exit System start of operations.” The planned launch date is currently October 6th, but there have been several delays in the past and may be another one.

The UK parliamentary committee heard that the prototype of the app should have been ready for EU member states in spring. Guy Opperman, Under-Secretary of State at the UK Department for Transport, said the app will not be available for testing until August “at best” and that the app will not be ready in time for October. The committee previously stated that the app might even be delayed until summer 2025.

Frontex’s Särekanno said in his interview: “Our aim is to have it ready by the end of the summer, so it can then be gradually integrated into national systems starting from early autumn”.

READ ALSO: How do the EES passport checks affect the 90-day rule?

Can the system be launched if the app is not ready?

Yes. The European Commission told The Local that “the availability of the mobile application is not a condition for the Entry/Exit System entry into operation or functioning of the system. The app is only a tool for pre-registration of certain types of data and the system can operate without this pre-registration.”

In addition, “the integration of this app at national level is to be decided by each Schengen country on a voluntary basis – as there is no legal obligation to make use of the app.”

And the UK’s transport under secretary Guy Opperman sounded a note of caution saying the app “is not going to be a panacea to fix all problems”.

When the app will be in use, will it be mandatory for travellers?

There is no indication that the app will become mandatory for those non-EU travellers who need to register for EES. But there will probably be advantages in using it, such as getting access to faster lanes.

As a reminder, non-EU citizens who are resident in the EU are excluded from the EES, as are those with dual nationality for a country using EES. Irish nationals are also exempt even though Ireland will not be using EES because it is not in the Schengen area.

Has the app been tested anywhere yet?

Frontex says the prototype of the app will be tested at Stockholm’s Arlanda Airport, in Sweden. Matthias Monroy’s website said it was tested last year at Munich Airport in Germany, as well as in Bulgaria and Gibraltar.

According to the German Federal Police, the blog reports, passengers were satisfied and felt “prepared for border control”.

This article is published in cooperation with Europe Street News.

 
SHOW COMMENTS