SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

DRUGS

EXPLAINED: What is Switzerland’s heroin distribution programme?

For the past 27 years, Switzerland has been dispensing heroin to addicts. How does this innovative project work?

EXPLAINED: What is Switzerland’s heroin distribution programme?
A needle exchange package. Image Wikicommons

A stickler for law, order, and rules, Switzerland can’t be called “unorthodox”. And yet, when it comes to certain aspects of its drug policy, the country has proven to be quite liberal and innovative. 

This description concerns specifically its pioneering heroin-assisted treatment program (HAT), which consists of supplying pure, industrially produced heroin under medical supervision to a limited number of addicts.

Why did Switzerland implement the HAT project?

The origins of the programme go back to the 1980s and early 1990s, when Zurich’s Platzspitz park was a notorious open drug scene. As addicts used to congregate there and inject drugs in full view, the site became known as a ‘Needle Park’.

Drug scene at Platzspitz. Photo by Stadt Zürich

As the number of drug overdose deaths and HIV rates climbed, officials recognised that repression was not effective in stopping the most hardened heroin users.

Instead, they decided to include prescription heroin as a “therapeutic measure for individuals with a severe heroin addiction”, according to the Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH).

Since 1994, HAT consists “of the strictly regulated and controlled administration of diacetylmorphine [heroin], accompanied by medical and psychosocial care. In the light of the positive results obtained, it was adopted as a therapeutic measure”, FOPH said.

André Seidenberg, a Zurich doctor who participated in the government’s heroin trials, told The Local that by adopting this pragmatic approach, “Switzerland has overcome hypocrisy and offered a safe and adequate supply of heroin to addicts, without moralising”.

READ MORE: Cannabis: What are the rules in Switzerland?

What is the goal of the programme?

Originally, it was meant to keep addicts off the streets and reduce crime.

But the programme goes beyond that. The government convened expert scientific and ethical advisory bodies to devise an alternative to “zero-tolerance” drug policies practiced elsewhere, focusing instead on prevention, harm reduction, medical care and counselling for the most severely dependent addicts, and eventually their reintegration into society.

As FOPH explains it, HAT’s goal is “to improve the physical and mental health of those affected and promote their social integration; to facilitate low-risk use and create the conditions for permanent abstinence; to distance those affected from the illegal drug scene and prevent crime associated with the supply of drugs”.

READ MORE: Drugs and alcohol: Just how much do the Swiss consume?

However, since strict supervision is required, the programme is only open to a small number of addicts: in 2019 — the last year for which data is available —1,700 people received this treatment in 22 specialist outpatient centres and one prison.

This covers only about eight percent of addicts, according to FOPH.

Who is eligible for the HAT programme?

The selection criteria is strict: FOPH considers only those with severe heroin dependency for at least two years who have had at least two unsuccessful treatment attempts, and who display physical, mental or social consequences of drug use.

For those who are not part of the HAT programme, several Swiss cities offer safe and clean ‘injection centres’ with sterile material and trained staff.

Has the HAT programme been successful?

FOPH says it has been a success. 

“The results show clearly a constant improvement in the addicted individuals’ mental and physical health, as well as in their social situation. Crime levels have also been reduced”.

The programme has been “the main game changer in Switzerland’s drug policy”, Seidenberg pointed out.

“Since a quarter of a century drug addicts live a normal life in Switzerland, with nearly normal life expectancies, and almost no more deaths from AIDS or overdose”, he added.

How does the public feel about this programme?

As HAT is government-run — that is, funded by taxpayers — it was necessary that Swiss public be on board before the project could get off the ground.

In a 1997 referendum, 70.6 percent of voters turned down proposals from conservative groups to scrap the government’s liberal policy on illegal drug use.

And in 2008, when it was time to renew the heroin distribution program, 68 percent of voters approved its continuation, because they saw it as an effective way to keep addicts off the streets and reduce crime.

Do other countries have similar programmes?

While in the 1990s Switzerland was a trailblazer in heroin distribution, since then a handful of other countries, including the UK, the Netherlands, as well as Canada and Australia, copied the concept, adjusting it to their own requirements.

Last but not least: what happened to Zurich’s Platzspitz?

It morphed from the needle and garbage-strewn drug hub to a clean recreational area popular with Zurich families.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

LIVING IN SWITZERLAND

The Zurich paradox: Why is world’s most expensive city also the best to live in?

Can residents of Switzerland’s largest city really be happy, considering its higher-than-elsewhere cost of living?

The Zurich paradox: Why is world's most expensive city also the best to live in?

In the latest quality of life report from the European Commission, Zurich has beat, fair and square, 82 cities across the EU, European Free Trade Association (EFTA) – that is, Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein – the United Kingdom, the Western Balkans, and Turkey.

The survey found that majority of Zurich residents are happy with their jobs, public transport, healthcare services, air quality, and their financial situation.

The city also offers the best quality of life for older people and the LGBTQ+ community in all of Europe.

While Zurich is not exactly a stranger to such accolades, having won similar titles before, it has not consistently scored high marks in all surveys.

On the contrary, for several years in a row, including in 2023, Zurich was ranked the world’s most expensive city in the Economist magazine’s Cost of Living index. Once the 2024 figures are released later in the year, it is a safe bet that Zurich will be at, or near, the top again.

This brings up a question of how a city (or a country) can be “best” and “worst” at the same time.

Not a major issue

Every second year, Zurich municipal authorities conduct a survey among the local population about what they like and dislike about the life in their city.

In the last such survey, published in December 2023, city residents mentioned such downsides as shortage of affordable housing and traffic congestion but, interestingly, the notoriously high cost of living was not cited as a huge concern. 

One reason may be high wages. 

Based on data from the Federal Statistical Office, a median monthly wage in the city is 8,000 francs – about 1,300 francs more than the already high median Swiss salary.

You may argue that the high salaries don’t necessarily compensate for high prices.

However, a new study shows that the purchasing power in Zurich is quite high.
 
With 57,771 francs of disposable income per capita, Zurich’s purchasing power is among the highest in the country, exceeding the national average of 50,000 francs (which, in itself, is higher than elsewhere).

READ ALSO: Where in Switzerland does your money go further? 

Of course, this is the case of the 50 percent of the population that earn upwards of the median wage; for the other half, the quality of life probably isn’t as high.

Assuming, then, that the surveys are carried out mostly among residents with decent salaries, their assessments of life in Zurich will be mostly positive.

The link between wealth and quality of life

Consider this domino effect:

The more people earn and the more income tax they pay (although Zurich’s rate is not Switzerland’s highest), the more money there will be in public coffers to spend on infrastructure, public transport, health services, school system, recreational activities, parks and green spaces, and all the other “perks” that contribute to the city’s quality-of-life ranking.

In other words, good life comes at a price, even though – in Zurich’s case – it is a high one.

SHOW COMMENTS