SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

SWEDISH HISTORY

OPINION: Why are racists in Sweden angry at history?

Swedish broadcaster SVT recently aired the first episode of its high-profile new series on Swedish history and racists aren't happy about it, The Local's Paul O'Mahony discovers.

OPINION: Why are racists in Sweden angry at history?
A new show by public broadcaster SVT aims to tell the history of Sweden. Photo: SVT

On Sunday night I sat down with my family and watched the first episode of Historien om Sverige (“the history of Sweden”), public broadcaster SVT’s big-budget series chronicling 15,000 years of Swedish history.

As the ice age retreated, the show explains, hunter-gatherers made their way north and established the first communities in the territory now known as Sweden.

As discovered by scientists around a decade ago, they were most likely dark-skinned and blue-eyed. Accordingly, this is how they are depicted in the show.

A thought flickers: the legions of online racists won’t like this one bit. Before even checking, I can hazard a decent guess at the caustic subtext in the online forums where racists lurk:

How dare they come up here and take our jobs before we even had jobs for them to take!

All of which is confirmed when I go on to Flashback, the anything-goes Swedish forum where bigots find their tribe.

A thread on the new series drips with the sarcasm-laden diatribes of countless “friends of Sweden”, ever wary of the enemy within, never pausing to consider they might be it.

How can SVT cast Africans as Swedes? Why all this woke, trans-friendly, feminist, left-wing propaganda?

And those are the more gentle comments. Every new page seems worse than the last in this vortex of crud (you’re welcome, heavy metal band name seekers). There are 1,700 comments in the thread I’m reading.

SURVEY:

I rush for the exit but soon hold my nose again and enter the entity formerly known as Twitter. A search for Historien om Sverige reveals another racist broth, though this one is not quite as spicy as Flashback’s.

Time to check Facebook, the festering mire of radicalisation that sucks in uncles and mothers and the second cousin you once thought you knew. And yes, angry aging gentlemen of the internet are also busy peppering Metaland with their hot takes and crap memes.

Algorithmic radicalisation is real. We can inoculate our minds with science but resistance is tough at a time when racists have become emboldened the world over and reason is in decline. The lines drawn against bigotry in our schools, parliaments and places of worship have become blurred as opportunist politicians undermine their worth. That’s as true in Sweden as it is elsewhere. 

It’s exhausting, but we do need to keep fighting these corrosive forces. Confront them in our daily lives. Don’t let ignorance and xenophobia go unchecked.

LISTEN: Why is Sweden scared to talk about racism?

a dark-skinned girl with dark hair and blue eyes

A still image from the series Historien om Sverige. Photo: SVT

So what does the science say on Sweden’s first inhabitants? Archaeology professor Jan Apel explains:

“The two groups that came to Scandinavia were originally genetically quite different, and displayed distinct physical appearances. The people from the south had blue eyes and relatively dark skin. The people from the northeast, on the other hand, had a variation of eye colours and pale skin.

“Originally, humans are a species from warmer climates closer to the equator and we mainly cope with challenging environments with specific behaviour and technology. This includes making fires, clothes and specialised hunting equipment. However, in the long term there is also potential for adaptation through genetic changes.

“For example, we found that genetic variants associated with light skin and eye pigmentation were carried, on average, in greater frequency among Scandinavian hunter gatherers than their ancestors from other parts of Europe. Scientists believe that light skin pigmentation helps people better absorb sunlight and synthesise vitamin D from it.”

My advice to the racist trolls: step out of the dark corners of the internet and into the light. Together we can synthesise some vitamin D and carve out time for real-life conversations. We all came into this world screaming, but we don’t have to stay shrill all our lives.

Member comments

  1. This is by far the worst article I have read on the Local so far. This piece of nonsensical gibberish is full of stupid accusations, baseless statements and calls for nonsense. All style, no substance. My opinion about the series: people are so tired of american race-swapping agenda which they see everywhere. Sad but true.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

POLITICS

OPINION: Why I registered as a candidate for Sweden’s new Folklistan party

As a registered candidate for Sweden's new Folklistan party I want an end to all border controls, a ban on fossil fuel use, and the abolition of legal gender. Well, I don't want any of those things, but when you have a party without policies, anything goes.

OPINION: Why I registered as a candidate for Sweden's new Folklistan party

The truth is I put myself forward as a candidate, and have now it seems been registered, simply out of professional curiosity.

As a journalist, I wanted to know what would happen. 

“At Folklistan we have chosen to have an open list,” the party claims on its website. “This means that any of you who sympathise with us can also stand as a candidate for us. It’s not going to be anonymous power brokers in a party who decide who represents us in the European Parliament. It’s the people. Do you want better politicians? Then be one.” 

When I followed the link provided on the site to the Swedish Election Authority, I only had to put in my BankID to register, which proved too much of a temptation to resist.  

At the time, the party had not clearly stated what any of its policies were. They had merely set up a website, which was, perhaps intentionally, full of grammatical errors, weird constructions and vague truisms. 

They’ve now said they want to entirely abolish the right to asylum in Sweden, which is a proposal that puts them further to the right of the already far-right Sweden Democrats. 

Sara Skyttedal and Jan Emanuel, the two renegade politicians fronting the party, have also said they want Sweden to negotiate with the EU in a tougher way, to “get a better deal for Sweden”.

There was a lot I wanted to find out when I registered: would someone from the party get in touch with me and would this give me some clues as to who else was behind it? Would I be required to do anything? Would I need to sign anything about how I should behave, or what I can say? 

So far it seems like the answer to all of these questions is “no”.

But at the same time, being a candidate appears to give me no rights whatsoever over the party programme or about how a party MEP would vote in the European Parliament in the still fairly unlikely scenario that they manage to get one.

So while I’m free to call for whatever policy I like – there’s no party whip – any vote for me as a candidate (should I not cancel my registration, which I will) would not go towards me starting a new life in Brussels.

Instead, it would go towards Skyttedal or Emanuel getting to vote in Brussels and Strasbourg.

When I checked with the Swedish Election Authority, they said I had not done anything illegal.

“I don’t think that you’ve done anything formally wrong,” a press officer told me. “Although if you write an article about this I think you need to state that you do not want to be a candidate for the party.”

She did, however, query whether Folklistan had an open list as a result of a new bottom-up approach to politics, or simply because they had missed the deadline.

To have a closed list, you need so-called partibeteckningen, or party designation, which means that the party can choose which candidates represent it, stop other parties using the same name in the election, and gain the right to receive a list of names and addresses of everyone qualified to vote. 

“To do that you need to register before the February 29th, so as the party was registered after that, its not possible to have a locked list,” the press spokesperson said. 

To explain the absence of a party congress, or any way for members or party candidates to set policy, a spokesperson for the new party said it was “not a party, more like a political alliance”. 

But if it’s a political alliance that hopes, as it claims to do, to draw candidates from across the political spectrum, it seems weird that the founders can propose a radical policy like abolishing the right to asylum without any kind of process or dialogue.

This seems less like a political alliance, and more like a dictatorship.  

SHOW COMMENTS