SHARE
COPY LINK

COVID-19 VACCINES

EXPLAINED: What does super-spreader event at German ‘2G’ party tell us about vaccine-only rules?

Over eighty people have been infected with the coronavirus after attending a party in the German town of Münster that was only for people who have immunity. What does this tell us?

EXPLAINED: What does super-spreader event at German '2G' party tell us about vaccine-only rules?
A 2G club night in Berlin. Photo: dpa | Sophia Kembowski

On Friday evening two weeks ago 380 young people danced the night away after a long week of work and study in a club in Münster.

Most of them were in their early or mid-20s – and all of them had said at the door that they were fully vaccinated against Covid-19 or had recovered from an infection. In other words, they were abiding by the so-called ‘2G rule’, which was a prerequisite for entry.

Nevertheless, it turned out to be a party night with consequences.

The city of Münster initially reported 26 infections after the party, but that number kept rising and by Friday stood at 85 guests plus one employee of the club.

On the other hand only mild or no symptoms have been reported so far.

So, does this ‘super-spreader event’ show that 2G is no better than 3G (which also allows tested people to enter venues) in the fight against the pandemic?

READ MORE:

Is it possible that 2G is not about protecting people after all, but about putting pressure on the unvaccinated – as critics suspect?

SPD health expert Karl Lauterbach disagrees. “Does this speak against 2G? No, clearly it speaks in favour. Without 2G, many more partygoers would have fallen seriously ill,” he recently said.

A party with several hundred guests – hardly any space, loud music, maybe even loud sing-alongs – all that creates an ideal environment for an infectious aerosol, Bernd Salzberger, chairman of the German Society for Infectiology, told DPA.

The party night in Münster was therefore a “special situation,” he said.

It can be concluded that party nights in clubs or discos cannot be infection-free even with 2G, Salzberger said – perhaps unlike in restaurants, where guests can keep more distance.

If only one or two of the guests have recently become infected, infections are possible even in vaccinated and recovered people, especially with the particularly contagious delta variant of the disease. In the case of delta infections, vaccine protection decreases and the probability of a so-called vaccination breakthrough increases significantly.

The city has ruled out that guests provided false information at the door. So far no offences have been found, said the city press office.

That the virus was able to spread so rapidly also cannot be due to a lack of proper ventilation. According to the maintenance company, the club’s ventilation system even exceed the requirements.

However, none of the participants became seriously ill. Vaccination therefore also protects against severe courses of disease in places where infection cannot be prevented.

The question of creating safety via 2G rules is particularly contentious in Germany.

Numerous states such as Hesse, Saxony-Anhalt, Brandenburg and Saxony have announced 2G requirements for indoor events. But these rules face possible defeat in court the restrictions on freedom for non-vaccinated people cannot be justified by a clear benefit for public health.

Member comments

  1. This should be proof of the 2G rule. Everybody infected has mild or no symptoms, plus as has been said this gives them even more protection for going onwards. Unvaccinated in the same situation could become seriously ill, so must vaccinated people not be allowed to get back to normal life just because of people who refuse to be vaccinated? I say no. If the refusics also want to party, they should ask their local clubs to hold Unvaccinated nights, then they can all hang out together. 😉

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

COVID-19 VACCINES

Italy’s constitutional court upholds Covid vaccine mandate as fines kick in

Judges on Thursday dismissed legal challenges to Italy's vaccine mandate as "inadmissible” and “unfounded”, as 1.9 million people face fines for refusing the jab.

Italy's constitutional court upholds Covid vaccine mandate as fines kick in

Judges were asked this week to determine whether or not vaccine mandates introduced by the previous government during the pandemic – which applied to healthcare and school staff as well as over-50s – breached the fundamental rights set out by Italy’s constitution.

Italy became the first country in Europe to make it obligatory for healthcare workers to be vaccinated, ruling in 2021 that they must have the jab or be transferred to other roles or suspended without pay.

The Constitutional Court upheld the law in a ruling published on Thursday, saying it considered the government’s requirement for healthcare personnel to be vaccinated during the pandemic period neither unreasonable nor disproportionate.

Judges ruled other questions around the issue as inadmissible “for procedural reasons”, according to a court statement published on Thursday.

This was the first time the Italian Constitutional Court had ruled on the issue, after several regional courts previously dismissed challenges to the vaccine obligation on constitutional grounds.

A patient being administered a Covid jab.

Photo by Pascal GUYOT / AFP

One Lazio regional administrative court ruled in March 2022 that the question of constitutional compatibility was “manifestly unfounded”.

Such appeals usually centre on the question of whether the vaccine requirement can be justified in order to protect the ‘right to health’ as enshrined in the Italian Constitution.

READ ALSO: Italy allows suspended anti-vax doctors to return to work

Meanwhile, fines kicked in from Thursday, December 1st, for almost two million people in Italy who were required to get vaccinated under the mandate but refused.

This includes teachers, law enforcement and healthcare workers, and the over 50s, who face fines of 100 euros each under rules introduced in 2021.

Thursday was the deadline to justify non-compliance with the vaccination mandate due to health reasons, such as having contracted Covid during that period.

Italy’s health minister on Friday however appeared to suggest that the new government may choose not to enforce the fines.

“It could cost more for the state to collect the fines” than the resulting income, Health Minister Orazio Schillaci told Radio Rai 1.

He went on to say that it was a matter for the Economy and Finance Ministry, but suggested that the government was drawing up an amendment to the existing law.

READ ALSO: Covid vaccines halved Italy’s death toll, study finds

The League, one of the parties which comprises the new hard-right government, is pushing for fines for over-50s to be postponed until June 30th 2023.

Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni had promised a clear break with her predecessor’s health policies, after her Brothers of Italy party railed against the way Mario Draghi’s government handled the pandemic in 2021 when it was in opposition.

At the end of October, shortly after taking office, the new government allowed doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals to return to work earlier than planned after being suspended for refusing the Covid vaccine.

There has been uncertainty about the new government’s stance after the deputy health minister in November cast doubt on the efficacy of Covid-19 vaccines, saying he was “not for or against” vaccination.

Italy’s health ministry continues to advise people in at-risk groups to get a booster jab this winter, and this week stressed in social media posts that vaccination against Covid-19 and seasonal flu remained “the most effective way to protect ourselves and our loved ones, especially the elderly and frail”.

SHOW COMMENTS