SHARE
COPY LINK

HEALTH

Top doctor urges shorter hospital stays for new mums

New mothers in Switzerland should follow the British example and spend less time in hospital after giving birth, according to a leading Swiss doctor.

Top doctor urges shorter hospital stays for new mums
File photo: Idal/Depositphotos

David Baud, head of obstetrics at the Lausanne University hospital CHUV, advocates moving to a more personalized approach to giving birth in hospital, Le Temps reported.

The paper said Baud, who has spent more than 15 years in maternity clinics at home and abroad, was shocked that the length of postnatal hospital stays in Switzerland has not decreased over time.

In Switzerland a new mother spends on average four days in hospital after a natural birth and five days following a caesarean section.

Baud believes this is too long, and is currently reviewing the care system within his own hospital with the aim of reducing the average stay to 72 hours.

The obstetrician, who has worked at the prestigious St Mary’s hospital in London, said mothers in Britain typically left hospital 48 hours after giving birth.

St Mary’s private Lindo Wing was where the Duchess of Cambridge recently gave birth to her third child, leaving the clinic just hours after the delivery.

Baud said hospital stays could be kept short in Britain because of the large network of midwives who attend to newborn babies and their mothers at home.

“The advantage of the British model is that the same midwife that attended the mother in hospital visits her later at home,” ensuring continuity of care, the doctor said.

“The British system is excellent because it guarantees the wellbeing of the mother and the child. Why stay in hospital longer than is necessary?” Baud said.

Although the Swiss health provision for expectant mothers is generally considered excellent, it is also very expensive.

A hospital delivery, covered by mandatory health insurance, costs approximately 3,500 francs.

Read also: The pros and cons of having kids in Switzerland

Baud's remarks come amid ongoing debate about how to lower Switzerland's high health insurance premiums.

HEALTH INSURANCE

Could glasses and contact lenses soon be covered by Swiss health insurance?

The Swiss health system is ranked among the best in the world, but some essentials, like glasses, aren't automatically covered by health insurance. That could soon change, however

Could glasses and contact lenses soon be covered by Swiss health insurance?

Green Party Federal Councillor Katharina Prelicz-Huber revealed in an interview with newspaper 20 Minuten this week that the Federal Parliament had tabled a motion to include prescription glasses and contact lenses in Switzerland’s mandatory health insurance scheme. 

Prelicz-Huber stated: “The purpose of compulsory health insurance is to provide the services you need to get or stay healthy,”

The motion forms part of the legislation that will be voted on during the 2024 summer session of the Federal Council. 

Proposed changes 

According to Switzerland’s peak optician body, 4 in 5 Swiss wear glasses or contact lenses at some point. 

It’s no surprise that statistics repository, Statista, projects the Swiss eyewear industry to be worth €1.37 billion by 2028. 

Currently, glasses and contact lenses are covered for up to 180 francs for children until age eighteen, if they are proscribed by a doctor.

Adults can also claim money back for glasses and contact lenses – however, they must be suffering from one of a short list of specific conditions such as keratoconus – where the cornea is distorted – or severe myopia, otherwise known as near-sightedness.

They must also have been specifically prescribed them by a doctor or optometrist. 

Otherwise, supplemental optical insurance must be purchased in Switzerland to ensure you can recoup the cost. 

Under the Green Party proposal, glasses, contact lenses, and other visual aids would be covered, regardless of age. 

Rising premiums prompt opposition 

Not everybody agrees with the proposal. 

The right-wing SVP has already spoken out against it, with Federal Councillor Diana Gutjahr arguing: “If we seriously want to slow down the burdensome and constantly rising health costs for the benefit of the population, we [must] show the political will not to constantly expand the benefits of compulsory health insurance.”

A spokesman for the the health insurance advocacy group Santesuisse, Matthias Müller, echoed Gutjahr, claiming that insurance constitutes “financing for extraordinary events such as illness.”

“If almost everyone benefits from a certain service, it is no longer an insurance benefit.”

A date for the vote has yet to be announced. 

SHOW COMMENTS