Read news from:
Austria
SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

MILITARY

Why did American bombers fly over Stockholm on Wednesday?

People in Stockholm and Uppsala may have had their lunches disturbed on Wednesday by two American bombers flying low over the city. Why were they there, and what were they doing?

Published: 6 March 2024 15:07 CET
Why did American bombers fly over Stockholm on Wednesday?
The two American bombers escorted by Swedish Jas 39 Gripen jets, flying over Avicii Arena in Stockholm. Photo: Christine Olsson/TT

What kind of planes were they?

The planes, a B-1B Lancer and B-52 Stratofortress from the American Bomber Task Force, were escorted by two Swedish Jas 39 Gripen jets.

The aircraft pictured above the Swedish government offices. Photo: Fredrik Sandberg/TT

Where were they going?

The four jets flew over Stockholm, Arlanda and Uppsala around lunchtime on Wednesday at an altitude of just under 1,000 metres, before joining the Nordic Response Nato exercise, according to the Swedish Armed Forces’ website.

Why were they flying over Stockholm?

“We’re doing this to make our presence known,” Armed Forces exercise planner Mikael Månsson told Svenska Dagbladet (SvD).

“It’s a clear signal to the Swedish people that we are protecting our national territory alongside our allies, creating safety and security for the Swedish population.”

A close-up of the two bombers and the Swedish Jas 39 Gripen jets. Photo: Anders Wiklund/TT

Does this have anything to do with Sweden’s Prime Minister visiting the US to potentially join Nato?

It doesn’t look like it. According to the Armed Forces’ website, this exercise was “planned a while ago”, so it seems to be a coincidence that it’s occurred just a day before Sweden is rumoured to be joining Nato.

The Armed Forces have been taking part in military exercises with other countries “for some time”, its website says.

Did you see or hear the planes? Let us know in the comments…

Member comments

  1. Personally, I find it sad to see formerly peaceful, neutral Sweden elect a far-right government, and then hear these government officials engage in war- and fear-mongering talk, and now this display of military jingoism. Sad. Echos of 1914…

  2. Pardon my sarcasm, but sure, having WAR planes flying over brings a great feeling of comfort…….

  4. Saw and heard from in front of threatening murder embassy (guess who) in Stockholm. Flying quite slowly and quite quietly compared to noise some planes make taking off or landing at Bromma

  6. Those of us who live or have lived near US airbases refer to the jarring noise created by these machines as “the sound of freedom.”

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

MILITARY

EXPLAINED: What you need to know about Sweden’s new military spending report

Sweden's parliamentary defence commission on Friday recommended adding 52.8 billion kronor to the national defence budget by 2030, taking defence spending to 2.6 percent of GDP.

Published: 27 April 2024 13:18 CEST
EXPLAINED: What you need to know about Sweden's new military spending report

What is the Swedish Defence Commision? 

The Swedish Defence Commission is a cross-party forum which seeks to ensure broad political agreement around Sweden’s defence requirements. It brings together representatives of all eight parties in the Swedish parliament, with two each from the Moderates, Sweden Democrats and Social Democrats and one each for the other parties.

There are also advisers and experts from the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry for Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Defence, the Ministry of Finance, the Prime Minister’s Office, the Swedish Armed Forces, the Swedish Defence Materiel Administration and the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency. Members of the committee are supported by a secretariat comprising one principal secretary and five secretaries.

What is the report they have delivered? 

The committee on Friday delivered its final, report, “Strengthened defence capability, Sweden as an Ally“, meeting the deadline given by the country’s defence minister Pål Jonson when he ordered the committee to develop proposals for a new defence bill in December 2022, with a total of four reports, the first three of which were delivered in April 2023, June 2023, December 2023. 

What have they recommended? 

The committee have recommended that Sweden’s budget is increased from 119 billion kronor a year in 2024 to 185 billion kronor in 2030, which would bring total spending to 2.6 percent of Sweden’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). 

The committee said it agreed with the recommendations given by Micael Byden, Supreme Commander of the Swedish Armed Forces in November 2023, which were that Sweden should increase or improve: 

  • air defence and in particular its cooperation within NATO’s Integrated Air and Missile Defence (IAMD)
  • its ability to combat air, land and sea drones 
  • its integration with NATO’s command system
  • its logistics, so that it can provide Host Nation Support and serve as a base for other units from other Nato countries. 
  • its capacity to operate with military units outside Sweden’s borders 

But the committee also made additional recommendations beyong those given by the armed forces, calling for: 

  • two new army brigades, so that Sweden would have three mechanised brigades and one infantry brigade by 2030
  • a new Norrland Infantry Regiment,
  • an increase in the number of conscripts trained a year from the current level of 8,000 to 10,000 in 2030 and 12,000 in 2032, and possibly to 14,000 in 2035
  • a boost in Sweden’s air defence capability, particularly to counter drone attacks 
  • stocking up on additional ammunition, including air-to-air and cruise missiles, and spare parts 
  • 20 new companies and platoons dedicated to defending Sweden’s territories 
  • increased refresher courses for conscripts, extra funding of voluntary defence organisations, and expansion of the officer education programme

How will the cost of funding this military expansion be met? 

While they were agreed on what needed to be done, party representatives on the committee did not agree on how much needed to be spent or how ti should be financed. 

The Centre Party representative said that spending should be higher, comprising 3 percent of GDP. 

The representatives from the Social Democrats, Left Party, and Green Party, added a statement to the report when they called for a section on how the extra spending should be financed.  

Peter Hultqvist, who served as defence minister under the former Social Democrat government, called for a new beredskapsskatt, or “Readiness Tax” to fund the increase, saying it was disappointing that the committee had not been able to agree on financing. 

“This demand is so big that it risks pushing other pressing requirements out of government spending plans,” he said. “There is a risk that healthcare, education and elderly care will be hit.” 

But Ulf Kristersson, Sweden’s prime minister, rejected the idea of a new tax. 

“It’s no secret that the parties on the left always see reasons to raise taxes, and that’s the case this time as well, I assume. But that is not our way forward,” he said. “We must be able to prioritise Swedish defense, and I understand that there is now complete agreement that it is an important political task.” 

Anna Starbrink, a defence spokesperson for the Liberals, the smallest party in the government, said that the Swedish Defence Commission had not in the past been tasked with developing funding proposals. 

“This is a new idea from the opposition and from the Social Democrats’ side is about nothing more than forcing through a new tax hike through the defence commission, and that’s something the rest of us don’t want to go along with,” she said. 

SHOW COMMENTS