SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

NATO

What does Nato membership mean for Sweden?

Sweden became a member of Nato on March 7th, but what does membership actually mean for Sweden?

What does Nato membership mean for Sweden?
Sweden takes part in a military exercise on Gotland together with Nato countries in 2022. Photo: Karl Melander/TT

Accession to the US-led alliance means stark changes for both Sweden’s defence and the geopolitical balance in the region.

Why did Sweden decide to join Nato?

At the end of the Napoleonic wars of the early 19th century, Sweden adopted an official policy of neutrality. Following the end of the Cold War, the neutrality policy was amended to one of military non-alignment.

While Sweden has sent forces to international peacekeeping missions, it has not gone to war for more than 200 years. The last conflict it fought was the Swedish-Norwegian War of 1814.

Despite its neutrality it pursued an active foreign policy, championing human rights and being a top aid donor per capita, sometimes being a labelled a “humanitarian superpower”.

But while remaining outside Nato, Sweden has formed ever-closer ties to the alliance, joining the Partnership for Peace programme in 1994 and then the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council in 1997.

However, a majority of Swedes were long opposed to full membership and it was considered a taboo among the Social Democrats – Sweden’s largest political party.

Former Social Democrat defence minister Peter Hultqvist even declared in the fall of 2021 that he could “guarantee” that he would never participate in a process to join Nato.

Only months later, Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine led to a dramatic shift in both public opinion and among political parties.

A broad majority of the Swedish parliament voted to apply for membership, which the country did – along with Finland – in May 2022.

What does Sweden bring to Nato?

For a long time, Swedish policy dictated that the country needed a strong military to protect its neutrality.

But after the end of the Cold War, it drastically slashed its defence spending, turning its military focus toward peacekeeping operations around the world.

In 1990, defence spending accounted for 2.6 percent of gross domestic product, shrinking to 1.2 percent by 2020, according to the government.

Spending started to increase again following Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea.

In March 2022, after Russia’s full invasion of Ukraine, Sweden announced it would increase spending again, targeting two percent of GDP “as soon as possible”.

In late 2023, Sweden’s government said military spending would exceed the two percent goal in 2024.

Combining its different branches, the Swedish military can field some 50,000 soldiers, about half of whom are reservists.

Its air force includes more than 90 of its domestically developed fighter jet Jas 19 Gripen, and it has a Baltic Sea navy that includes several corvettes and submarines.

Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson also said in January that his country was ready to contribute troops to Nato’s forces in Latvia.

Sweden and Finland joining Nato also means that the Baltic Sea becomes surrounded by alliance members, with some analysts dubbing it a Nato lake.

“It’s the final piece of the puzzle on Nato’s map in Northern Europe that is now falling into place,” Robert Dalsjö, an analyst at the Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI), told AFP.

What are the implications for Sweden’s defence?

As a member of Nato, the country’s military calculations change in several key aspects.

“Sweden has for a long time worked from the presumption: ‘We’ll solve the task alone’,” Jan Henningson, a researcher at the FOI, told AFP.

“That changes now,” he added, explaining that defence will now need to be conducted within the alliance.

“Now we’ll have to learn to be a team player. And we’ll have to adjust to the fact that we are not preparing to defend just Swedish territory, but allied territory,” Dalsjö noted.

For Sweden, joining the alliance also upends its traditional thinking of power relations in a potential conflict.

“Traditionally, we have thought that we are a small state and whoever attacks us is much bigger,” Henningson said.

But when it comes to the economy and demographics, “Nato is much larger than Russia,” according to Henningson.

“We are no longer David in all aspects, so to speak,” Henningson said – a change that is not lost on Sweden’s military.

“It’ll be a quite impressive force with hopefully the combined might of 32 countries from Turkey in the south all the way up to Svalbard” in the Arctic, Swedish army chief Jonny Lindfors told newspaper Dagens Nyheter in December.

He added that he thinks the extra strength would make the risk of a conflict breaking out less likely.

Article first published in February 2024

Member comments

  1. It is sad to see military preparation. It is said that violence starts when politics fails, I would like to see more talks, more discussions, more empathy, more agreements between country leaders.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

MILITARY

EXPLAINED: What you need to know about Sweden’s new military spending report

Sweden's parliamentary defence commission on Friday recommended adding 52.8 billion kronor to the national defence budget by 2030, taking defence spending to 2.6 percent of GDP.

EXPLAINED: What you need to know about Sweden's new military spending report

What is the Swedish Defence Commision? 

The Swedish Defence Commission is a cross-party forum which seeks to ensure broad political agreement around Sweden’s defence requirements. It brings together representatives of all eight parties in the Swedish parliament, with two each from the Moderates, Sweden Democrats and Social Democrats and one each for the other parties.

There are also advisers and experts from the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry for Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Defence, the Ministry of Finance, the Prime Minister’s Office, the Swedish Armed Forces, the Swedish Defence Materiel Administration and the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency. Members of the committee are supported by a secretariat comprising one principal secretary and five secretaries.

What is the report they have delivered? 

The committee on Friday delivered its final, report, “Strengthened defence capability, Sweden as an Ally“, meeting the deadline given by the country’s defence minister Pål Jonson when he ordered the committee to develop proposals for a new defence bill in December 2022, with a total of four reports, the first three of which were delivered in April 2023, June 2023, December 2023. 

What have they recommended? 

The committee have recommended that Sweden’s budget is increased from 119 billion kronor a year in 2024 to 185 billion kronor in 2030, which would bring total spending to 2.6 percent of Sweden’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). 

The committee said it agreed with the recommendations given by Micael Byden, Supreme Commander of the Swedish Armed Forces in November 2023, which were that Sweden should increase or improve: 

  • air defence and in particular its cooperation within NATO’s Integrated Air and Missile Defence (IAMD)
  • its ability to combat air, land and sea drones 
  • its integration with NATO’s command system
  • its logistics, so that it can provide Host Nation Support and serve as a base for other units from other Nato countries. 
  • its capacity to operate with military units outside Sweden’s borders 

But the committee also made additional recommendations beyong those given by the armed forces, calling for: 

  • two new army brigades, so that Sweden would have three mechanised brigades and one infantry brigade by 2030
  • a new Norrland Infantry Regiment,
  • an increase in the number of conscripts trained a year from the current level of 8,000 to 10,000 in 2030 and 12,000 in 2032, and possibly to 14,000 in 2035
  • a boost in Sweden’s air defence capability, particularly to counter drone attacks 
  • stocking up on additional ammunition, including air-to-air and cruise missiles, and spare parts 
  • 20 new companies and platoons dedicated to defending Sweden’s territories 
  • increased refresher courses for conscripts, extra funding of voluntary defence organisations, and expansion of the officer education programme

How will the cost of funding this military expansion be met? 

While they were agreed on what needed to be done, party representatives on the committee did not agree on how much needed to be spent or how ti should be financed. 

The Centre Party representative said that spending should be higher, comprising 3 percent of GDP. 

The representatives from the Social Democrats, Left Party, and Green Party, added a statement to the report when they called for a section on how the extra spending should be financed.  

Peter Hultqvist, who served as defence minister under the former Social Democrat government, called for a new beredskapsskatt, or “Readiness Tax” to fund the increase, saying it was disappointing that the committee had not been able to agree on financing. 

“This demand is so big that it risks pushing other pressing requirements out of government spending plans,” he said. “There is a risk that healthcare, education and elderly care will be hit.” 

But Ulf Kristersson, Sweden’s prime minister, rejected the idea of a new tax. 

“It’s no secret that the parties on the left always see reasons to raise taxes, and that’s the case this time as well, I assume. But that is not our way forward,” he said. “We must be able to prioritise Swedish defense, and I understand that there is now complete agreement that it is an important political task.” 

Anna Starbrink, a defence spokesperson for the Liberals, the smallest party in the government, said that the Swedish Defence Commission had not in the past been tasked with developing funding proposals. 

“This is a new idea from the opposition and from the Social Democrats’ side is about nothing more than forcing through a new tax hike through the defence commission, and that’s something the rest of us don’t want to go along with,” she said. 

SHOW COMMENTS