SHARE
COPY LINK

HEALTH

Why Brits in Italy say they’ve been ‘hung out to dry’ over €2K healthcare fee

After Italy hiked minimum annual healthcare fees to €2,000 from January, The Local's British readers covered by post-Brexit rules say a lack of clarity and communication about how this applies to them has made the increase much worse.

Why Brits in Italy say they've been ‘hung out to dry' over €2K healthcare fee
Medical staff members (Photo by Miguel MEDINA / AFP)

Italy’s foreign residents who make voluntary contributions into the Italian healthcare system (Servizio sanitario nazionale, or SSN) until last year paid a minimum fee of €387 per year. 

But from the beginning of 2024, this minimum has shot up by more than sixfold to €2,000, meaning that volunteers, people on elective residency visas and people over the age of 65 on family reunification visas will all have to pay this much – or more – to use the SSN.

While the steep price hike is hard for anyone to swallow, for some British residents based in Italy before the Brexit transition period ended, there is added frustration at being told they have to pay the charge when their healthcare should be free.

Under European law they are protected by the post-Brexit Withdrawal agreement (WA) which states that their conditions within Italy should remain the same as before.

READ ALSO: Trouble proving residency rights leaves Brits in Italy paying €2k health charge

And those who have been legally resident in Italy for more than five years are eligible for permanent residency, which brings with it the right to free healthcare.

But some British citizens covered by the WA say they’re having problems proving their residency rights, or are dealing with varying official interpretations of the rules – which risks leaving them without healthcare unless they pay the €2,000 charge.

“I feel shocked and horrified. I don’t know how they’ve justified this. Where is the official line from the Ministry of Health for us WA beneficiaries? Why are we not getting clarification?” retiree Vanessa* in Lucca, Tuscany, tells The Local.

“It feels unjust. It’s like we’ve been hung out to dry.”

Vanessa is a permanent resident in Italy as she has been living here since 2016. But she says her local authority is interpreting the rules differently.

After writing emails back and forth to her local Azienda Sanitaria Locale (ASL) she was told she had to pay the €2,000 minimum or be left without healthcare.

“My nerves keep going,” she says. “I had a biopsy just before Christmas and I’m under control measures. It’s hanging over my head and I can’t even stick up for myself as my rights have not been communicated to me.”

She said even her doctor was confused as to why she’s been told she has to pay despite being a permanent resident.

The main issue, she believes, is the lack of communication and clarity on the policy among officials. She was told by her ASL the new budget law superseded the  Withdrawal Agreement in terms of residency rights, therefore affecting her access to services.

READ ALSO: Q&A: What you need to know about Italy’s €2,000 healthcare fee

“It seems like everything you do here is a struggle. It’s like they all have their own interpretation and they don’t read the whole thing,” she says.

“It’s inconsistent, there’s no clarity, and there is a certain amount of prejudice towards us. There has to be some kind of breakthrough.”

The lack of communication is also an issue for Liguria-based Claire Francis. She’s waiting on further clarification from the health ministry as to whether the new measures will affect her husband (who she is a carer for) and herself. 

“I still feel incredulous that an increase on the fees being charged is even legal given the massive uplift,” she says. “It feels deliberately discriminatory and unjust, especially with the lack of information and clarity surrounding it.

“It’s been implemented across Italy in a haphazard way depending on the interpretation by the various comune and ASL offices.”

Jim Grant who lives in the south of the country in Ostuni says his main concern is the huge fee increase over a short period of time, and he is among those who are now considering opting for private healthcare. 

“A gradual increase over a couple of years, with some advance notice, would have been more palatable,” he says. “In the years we’ve been here, my wife and I have not used any state medical services at all.

“The only health intervention was when I had hearing issues and I paid for this to be dealt with privately as, bizarrely, it was cheaper than the ASL voluntary contribution. I shall continue along the private route until I am eligible, if we stay in Italy.”

Greg* has also found that obtaining permanent residency is also another hurdle to obtaining healthcare, along with the new charges.

He, like Vanessa, has permanent residency rights and therefore the same healthcare rights as Italian nationals. However, a lack of communication between the comune and ASL has prevented this from happening.

“We are really frustrated with this as it happens every year and we both have serious health issues which require regular medication,” he says. “In my case,  I unfortunately have blood cancer and need to visit the hospital every month for tests.

“We aren’t being treated fairly.”

*Names have been changed in this article to protect the identity of the interviewees.

Have you got an opinion on the new healthcare charge? Do you agree or disagree with the opinions expressed in this article? Leave a comment below to share your thoughts or get in touch with us by email.

 

Member comments

  1. This is all very well reporting on the usual disfunction across the various Italian regions BUT what is being done about this by either or both the Italian and British Government/Consulate.
    Obviously the new budget cannot supercede the WA without Brussels and Whitehalls approval which it would never get. Is it possible for you to make the necessary representations to eg the British consulate please ? – I’m sure it will get sorted in the fullness of time but in the meantime people are suffering

    1. Hi, campaigners and groups such as Beyond Brexit are doing fantastic work on this issue. We’ll continue to report on the progress they make.

      Thanks for reading,
      – Clare

  2. The following comment was submitted by Clarissa Killwick of Beyond Brexit:

    “It is very important for Withdrawal Agreement beneficiaries in Italy to understand how much we are on our own now. People can’t just sit and wait for something to be done about WA breaches. Dedicated support from the UK government to help those having difficulties stopped a long time ago. Embassy resources have been reduced. Furthermore, there is no independent monitoring of WA implementation as there is in the UK.

    Our group is run by three volunteers (with day jobs!) with no funding whatsoever and we are, by no means, able to reach everyone, for example, those not on social media. Yes, we constantly raise these issues with the embassy but, more than three years on after the end of transition, problems are ongoing.

    Individuals also need to make as much noise as they can which could take many forms. Talk to your sindaco, make a complaint to URP of the public office you are having a problem with. Contact the embassy, using the contact form on the gov.uk Living in Italy page and persist even after you get the standard answer suggesting you get a lawyer. Write to your UK MP. Make an official complaint to the European Commission. Use any contacts you have such as journalists or politicians. Do you know anyone in ANCI or ANUSCA?

    We all need to do what we can to raise awareness of the very particular problems that WA beneficiaries face in Italy. The current very serious issue of some people being charged the new minimum of €2000 for SSN voluntary contributions rather than €0 because they cannot prove their permanent residency is a clear example of how much damage can be caused by lack of clear guidance from the top – to all the public offices that deal with us. That is what we are asking for.”

  3. Demanding change from the top as Clarissa Killwick appears to be doing is to completely misunderstand how Italy – a nation of separate historical identities and loyalties – functions. ‘They do things differently here’ applies from the comune level upwards. Go local, it’s the only way. Also, it’s more fun.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

TRAVEL NEWS

EES: Could the launch of Europe’s new border system be delayed again?

After being postponed several times already Europe's new biometric Entry/Exit border system (EES) is set to be rolled out in October, but with fears of lengthy queues, problems with a new app and demands for more time, could it be postponed again?

EES: Could the launch of Europe's new border system be delayed again?

Could the entry into operation of the EU entry/exit system (EES), the new biometric passport checks for non-EU citizens at the Schengen area’s external borders, be delayed yet again?

Originally planned for May 2022, EES has already been postponed many times.

The current launch date, set for October 2024, was chosen to avoid periods of peak traffic and France in particular had requested to avoid it being launched until after the Paris Olympics this summer.

When asked to confirm the October start date this week a spokesperson for the EU’s Commission told The Local that the “roadmap” for the EES IT system foresees it will be ready for Autumn 2024. But the actual start date, in other words, the day when passengers will have to register, would be confirmed nearer the time.

The spokesperson said: “The exact date will be determined by the European Commission and announced on the EES official website well in time for the start of operations.”

READ ALSO: Your key questions answered about Europe’s new EES passport checks

But the reasons are adding up to suggest an October start date is optimistic, perhaps even unlikely.

In the annual report on the ‘State of Schengen’ published last week, the European Commission spelt out that severe challenges remain if member states are to be ready on time.

“In 2023, efforts to ensure the entry into operation of the Entry-Exit System in the autumn of 2024 were accelerated… While important progress has been made across the Schengen area, some Member States are still falling behind, notably regarding the effective equipment of border crossing points. The Commission calls on all Member States to urgently accelerate preparations to ensure the timely implementation of the system…”

A map in the report shows that preparation is still “in progress” in 13 Schengen area countries, including Germany, Norway and Switzerland. “Outstanding issues” still impact Portugal, Malta and Bulgaria.

The state of play for the preparations for EES across EU and Schengen states. Image: European Commission.

There are also reports that EU heavyweight Germany is trying to persuade Brussels to delay.

Matthias Monroy, editor of the German civil rights journal Bürgerrechte & Polizei/CILIP claimed on his website that “the German government is lobbying in Brussels to postpone the date once again, as otherwise the German tests of the EES cannot be completed in full. Other EU countries are also behind schedule, with only eight of them having reported successful integration.”

Even on a French government website it talks of EES being rolled out some time “between the end of 2024 and 2025” rather than stating October 2024.

And according to recent media reports, French airports have been advised to be ready for November 6th, rather than October. 

READ ALSO: EES and Etias – what are the big upcoming travel changes in Europe?

A planned EU app, believed to be essential to the smooth operation of EES because it would allow non-EU visitors to register in advance of travel will not be ready, Gwendoline Cazenave, Managing Director of Eurostar International, the company operating train services via the Channel Tunnel, has told the BBC. The EU however insists the app does not need to be up and running before EES is introduced.

In the UK, which will be heavily impacted by EES due to the fact it is no longer in the EU and so British travellers are no longer EU citizens, the House of Commons European scrutiny committee is conducting an inquiry on the potential disruption the introduction of the EES will cause at the border.

Several respondents have recently raised the alarm about the possible delays the system could cause, especially at the UK-France border, which is used by millions of passengers each year who head to France and other countries across Europe.

Ashford Borough Council in Kent has warned of the possibility of more than 14 hours queues to reach the Port of Dover, which has already been struggling increased checked after Brexit.

The BBC reported that back in March, a P&O Ferries director said the IT system should be delayed again.

Airlines have also complained about the fact pre-travel EES requirements would make last minute bookings impossible.

The Union des Aéroports Français (UAF), which represents airports in France, has simply said more time is needed.

In other words, it would be little surprise if the roll out was delayed again beyond October 2024.

But the Commission spokesperson told The Local that “the timeline for the entry into operation of the EES took into account all the necessary activities to be performed by all relevant stakeholders to ensure a timely entry into operation. 

“The Commission is working very closely with eu-Lisa [the EU agency in charge of the IT system], the Member States and carriers to ensure that everything is ready for the timely and successful launch of the Entry Exit System.

“The roadmap for the delivery of the new IT architecture foresees that the Entry/Exit system will be ready to enter into operation in Autumn 2024.”

New digital border

The EES is a digital system to register travellers from non-EU countries when they cross a border in or out of the Schengen area, the travel-free area. It will be deployed in 29 countries across Europe including 25 EU states plus Norway, Switzerland, Iceland and Liechtenstein. Ireland and Cyprus are the only EU members who won’t apply the EES system.

It doesn’t apply to non-EU nationals who are legally resident in an EU/Schengen area country or those with dual nationality of an EU /Schengen county. The system was designed to increase security and to ensure that non-EU nationals visiting the Schengen area short-term do not stay more than 90 days in any 180-day period.

Instead of having the passport stamped, travellers will have to scan it at self-service kiosks before crossing the border. However, fingerprints and a photo will have to be registered in front of a guard at the first crossing and there are huge concerns the extra time needed could generate long queues in the UK, where there are juxtaposed border checks with the EU.

Preparations are ongoing throughout Europe and some countries have made good progress.

In France, Getlink, the operator of the Channel Tunnel, has recently reported that new EES infrastructure is finished at its French terminal of Coquelles, which will allow travellers to register their biometric data while travelling.

Eurostar is also installing 49 kiosks in stations for the registration of passengers. But the Union des Aéroports Français (UAF), which represents airports in France, said more time is needed.

Exempted

Meanwhile, the Polish government has urged UK citizens who are beneficiaries of the EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement to get a residence permit “in the context of EES/ETIAS”, even though there was not such an obligation to stay legally in Poland post-Brexit.

“Having such a document is beneficial as it will exempt from future Entry/Exit System (EES) registration when crossing external borders and from the need to obtain an ETIAS travel permit in relation to short-term travel to EU/Schengen countries,” the government page says.

This article as published in collaboration with Europe Street news.

SHOW COMMENTS