SHARE
COPY LINK

ENVIRONMENT

‘A big win for the climate’: Greenpeace celebrates victory over Norway

A Norway court ruled Thursday that production licenses awarded for three oil fields were invalid, including one field already in operation, finding in favour of two environmental groups.

'A big win for the climate': Greenpeace celebrates victory over Norway
Norwegian branch of Greenpeace celebrates victory over oil field licences. Illustration Photo by Alexiane LEROUGE / AFP

The Nordic branch of Greenpeace and the Norwegian organisation Natur og Ungdom (Nature and Youth) sued the Norwegian state in June 2023, arguing that the government’s green light to develop the Tyrving, Breidablikk and Yggdrasil fields had not been preceded by sufficient climate impact studies.

The Oslo district court sided with the two groups.    

“The state is prohibited from making any new decisions” on the development of the three fields until the validity of the licenses is definitively decided, judge Lena Skjold said.

The ruling concerns only the three fields, and not other operations underway on Norway’s continental shelf, she said.

Energy giant Equinor put Breidablikk, which is believed to hold some 200 million barrels of recoverable oil, into production in October.

Tyrving and Yggdrasil, which are estimated to contain around 675 million barrels, are due to enter into production in 2025 and 2027 respectively.

“This is a big win for the climate over the Norwegian state,” the head of Greenpeace Norway, Frode Pleym, told AFP.

“We demand a halt to all development.”

The energy ministry has yet to respond to AFP’s request for a comment.

Norway is regularly criticised for its oil and gas production, of which it is western Europe’s main exporter.

The government has argued that its projects boost employment and hone skills, and has cited the need for Norway to continue supplying energy to the continent following the war in Ukraine.

In December 2020, Norway’s Supreme Court dismissed a lawsuit brought by Greenpeace and Natur og Ungdom calling for the cancellation of exploration licenses granted in May 2016 to 13 oil companies in the fragile Arctic region.

The court argued that Article 112 of Norway’s constitution which guarantees the right to a healthy environment could only be invoked if the state failed to shoulder responsibility for the environment and climate, which it said was not the case.

This time, the two organisations argue climate impact studies on the future oil fields are “either non-existent or highly inadequate”.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

ENVIRONMENT

Norway to be taken to court by WWF over deep sea mining

The World Wide Fund for Nature's (WWF) Norwegian chapter said Thursday it would take legal action against Norway for opening up its seabed to mining before performing sufficient impact studies.

Norway to be taken to court by WWF over deep sea mining

Already Western Europe’s largest oil and gas producer, Norway could become one of the first countries to authorise seabed mining, arguing the importance of not relying on China or authoritarian countries for minerals essential for renewable technology.

While deep-sea mining is contentious due to its potential impact on vulnerable marine ecosystems, Norway’s parliament in January formally gave its green light to open up parts of its seabed to exploration.

“Norway’s decision to proceed with opening up vast areas of ocean for destructive mining, is an unprecedented management scandal,” Karoline Andaur, CEO of WWF Norway, said in a statement.

“We have never before seen a Norwegian government so arrogantly ignore all scientific advice and defy the warnings of a united marine research community,” she continued.

According to WWF, the impact studies carried out by Norway’s energy ministry did not meet the criteria required by Norwegian law.

During the public hearing process, the Norwegian Environment Agency — a government agency — reached the same conclusion, citing “significant gaps in the knowledge about nature, technology and environmental impact.”

Several countries, including France and the UK, have called for a moratorium on deep-sea mining, and the European Parliament expressed concern following Norway’s decision to move forward.

Meanwhile, Oslo maintains that by allowing the prospecting it wants to fill in gaps in knowledge to determine whether undersea mining can take place without serious impact on the environment. Otherwise, it will not be authorised.

“We believe that a thorough process has been carried out with broad involvement, and that the applicable requirements have been followed,” Astrid Bergmal, state secretary at Norway’s Ministry of Energy, told AFP in an email Thursday.

On April 12th, the Ministry announced that it was opening up an area of the Norwegian Sea and Greenland Seas to exploration, with the aim of awarding the first licences in the first half of 2025.

In early 2023, the Norwegian Offshore Directorate published a report concluding that “substantial resources are in place on the seabed” including minerals such as copper, zinc and cobalt.

Among other uses, they are crucial for the manufacturing of batteries, wind turbines, computers and mobile phones.

SHOW COMMENTS