SHARE
COPY LINK

ECONOMY

French economic recovery programme risks being overtaken by new lockdown

A plan announced with fanfare two months ago to support the French economy's recovery from the coronavirus pandemic has yet to be finalised but is already at risk of being overtaken by events as the government has imposed a second lockdown.

French economic recovery programme risks being overtaken by new lockdown
French President Emmanuel Macron chairs a video conference with foreign company executives on November 6, 2020, as part of a "mini choose France" forum, designed designed to attract more foreign busin

“This 'Relaunch France' strategy … is not a strategy to confront the difficulties of the moment, that we have already done and we'll continue to do…, no it is to prepare France for 2030,” President Emmanuel Macron said shortly before the government unveiled the programme at the start of September.

Yet the government said the programme's 100 billion euros in spending over two years, with one-third consecrated to supporting shifting the economy onto a sustainable environmental basis, aims to return the French economy to its pre-pandemic level by 2022.

But that goal is now under threat with a second wave of coronavirus cases having pushed the government to adopt a new lockdown.

While the restrictions are less severe than during the original March-May lockdown, it will still disrupt huge sections of the economy as businesses that welcome the public such as restaurants, gyms, theatres and cinemas, shut their doors.

READ MORE: What closes and what stays open during France's second Covid-19 lockdown?

'Time lag'

“There was a time lag between the announcement of the recovery plan, which was elaborated based on a scenario of only one wave of the epidemic, and today we need to go into a lockdown again with the resulting economic consequences,” said Anne-Laure Delatte, an economist at France's CNRS national scientific research centre.

According to an analysis published by the Institut Montaigne think tank on Friday, just over a fifth of the 100 billion euros will provide short-term support to the economy. Half of the money will only have an effect over the medium or long term. The rest will likely have a mixed effect.

The government's plan was also based on the expectation of a strong rebound in the economy. It has forecast 8 percent growth in 2021 following an 11 percent drop this year.

But that rebound is likely to be less pronounced as it will take longer, which even the government acknowledges.

“We'll have to re-evaluate these figures in light of the duration of the confinement,” Economy Minister Bruno Le Maire said Wednesday.

Demonstrators from various economic sectors gather to protest against the closing of 'non-essential' business in Toulouse, southern France on November 6, 2020, during the national lockdown aimed at containing the spread of Covid-19. Lionel BONAVENTURE / AFP

The European Commission and IMF have already lowered their forecasts for France next year, seeing respectively 5.8 percent and 6 percent growth.

“We're in a situation of extreme uncertainty: we're beginning to realise this isn't the final wave and then you have to add in the international context with Brexit and to a lesser extent the US election,” said Delatte.

Depending on the health situation at the end of the lockdown “either there'll be a dynamic rebound, probably similar to what we saw in the third quarter, or households and businesses will anticipate another lockdown and some will undoubtedly adopt a wait-and-see attitude,” said Xavier Ragot, head of the independent French Economic Observatory.

With consumer spending and business investment two critical elements of the economy, a wait-and-see attitude would hobble a rebound. A recovery programme, in addition to directly stimulating the economy, should also give consumers and businesses confidence to spend.

A customer pushes a trolley past the closed toy department of a supermarket in Bordeaux on November 4, 2020, on the sixth day of a lockdown aimed at containing the spread of Covid-19. Supermarkets banned on November 4, 2020 the sale of “non-essential products.” Philippe LOPEZ / AFP

'Late and poorly calibrated'

After weathering the first lockdown many companies find themselves in a weaker position, often with more debt.

The French Senate's finance committee has called on the government to adjust the recovery plan. Its spokesman, Senator Jean-François Husson called it “late and poorly calibrated”, saying he believed the government “should now favour temporary measures to support the economy”.

Several economists have called for support to help companies to avoid cash crunches and stave off a possible wave of bankruptcies. The plan only includes 3 billion euros of this type of support.

“This is essential as once you have one company which goes bankrupt, in reality you'll have a cascade because the suppliers and clients will themselves be put in difficulty,” said the CNRS's Delatte.

Companies will also likely need to make greater use of the temporary furlough programme under which the government picks up a majority of the salaries of employees which are idled due to confinement restrictions or a drop in activity, said the French Economic Observatory's Ragot.

Meanwhile, the Institut Montaigne said households with modest incomes would likely need more support as crises accentuate inequality.

The government does not exclude the idea of reinforcing short term measures such helping companies meet their rent.

The economy minister said other measures can be introduced into the draft of the 2021 budget, even if he defended the government's current strategy.

READ MORE: What are the rules of France's second coronavirus lockdown?

 

 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

JOHN LICHFIELD

OPINION: France’s economy is far from doomed, but not quite booming either

Depending on who you ask, France's economy is either booming or doomed - John Lichfield takes a look at who is right and where French finances are heading.

OPINION: France's economy is far from doomed, but not quite booming either

France is booming. France is also doomed. Take your pick.

On a much-visited French news site Le Figaro this week, consecutive stories collided head on.

The first story reported that the annual ‘Choose France’ conference will bring a record number of foreign investments to French soil in 2024 (56 projects worth €15 billion). France is the most attractive country in Europe for foreign investment for the fifth year in succession.

The second story – an essay by the political commentator and pollster Jérôme Fourquet – said that the French economic model of the last 40 years, had “reached the end of the road and left the country in a cul-de-sac”.

France no longer “made anything”, the essay said. The economy was being kept alive by state and consumer spending, funded unsustainably by twin deficits of trade and public finance.

Which is true? Both, up to a point.

The Choose France foreign investment conference in Versailles this week will be the most successful since President Emmanuel Macron launched the project six years ago. France opened 200 more factories than it closed last year, returning to a modest trend of “re-industrialisation” interrupted by the Covid and Ukraine crises.

Jérôme Fourquet’s essay was brilliant but also over the top. It ignored some of the positive developments in France of recent years.

It suggested that France “made nothing” but also admitted that the country was a world leader in arms, cosmetics, perfume, luxury goods and wine.

France, Fourquet might have added, is also one of the world’s largest exporters of cereals. It holds a major part of Airbus, the world’s most successful plane-maker. Unlike the UK, it is still a train-maker and a car-maker, although both industries have declined.

All the same, the essay made good points about the “French model” created unconsciously over four decades by governments of Right and Left and only timidly changed by Emmanuel Macron’s Centre in the last seven years.

Fourquet defines the French model as “state-consumerist”, a mixture of excessive public spending and taxation and generous pensions and welfare payments which allow most French people to live reasonably well. Unfortunately, the high taxation is never enough to cover the public spending and the consumers consume more from abroad than the country exports.

The result is twin, expanding deficits in public spending and the balance of payments which cannot be sustained indefinitely.

In 2003, France’s accumulated state debt was the equivalent of 63 percent of annual GDP. It is now 110 percent of GDP. The annual service charge is about to overtake education as the single biggest item in the state budget.

In 2006, France’s trade deficit was €4.3 billion. In 2023, it was €99.6 billion (admittedly inflated by the high cost of oil and gas).

Fourquet says the cost and bureaucratic weight of the French state make creating businesses – and wealth and jobs – more difficult than in other EU countries. This is covered up by more state spending which, in turn, sustains consumer spending which, in turn, boosts the twin deficits. A vicious spiral.

He concedes that Macron has tried to chip away at the state in the last seven years. The President has also splashed the cash on pet projects and has done little to reduce the regulatory burden.

Rather than lighten the entire system, Macron suspends rules and norms when he wants to get stuff done (such as the rebuilding of Notre Dame cathedral). The success of his foreign investment drive is also partly based on “keys in hand” offers of low or no-regulation factory sites which are not always easily accessible to domestic investors.

Some of those criticisms are justified. Macron has not been the revolutionary that he promised to be in 2017. He has been a plodding state reformer, extending with some success the job-friendly policies introduced by President François Hollande. France being France, neither man gets any credit.

There are signs that the economic downturn late last year (and the explosion in the budget deficit) may have been a temporary set-back as Macron insisted. Growth in the first three months of this year exceeded expectations at 0.2 percent of GDP. Jobs are being created again. (More than 1 million extra jobs since pre-Covid days).

High energy costs are crippling business across Europe but they are lower in France than elsewhere. The boom in foreign investment in France has tended to be high in value but low in jobs. The industrious and energetic minister for industry and energy, Roland Lescure, says that is now changing.

One of the projects under discussion at Choose France is a home-grown plan for a €1.6 billion solar panel factory in the Rhône delta which would create 12,000 jobs.

So is it boom or is it doom?

Neither. There has been a gradual, positive shift in the French social-economic model in the last seven to ten years which Jérôme Fourquet plays down or ignores.

Macron promised to do far more but he has had to surmount to two international crises (Covid and Ukraine) and to adjust to two domestic revolts (Yellow Vests and pensions reform). His unpopularity is partly explained by his failure to sell a convincing narrative of reform; it is also explained by France’s obsession with “reform” (in the abstract) but hatred of all “reforms” (in detail).

But what are the alternatives? All the opposition forces, from far-left to far-right, offer policies which would preserve or worsen an unsustainable status quo.

Macron’s final three years are unlikely to achieve much in the way of new reforms. A recovery of the economy might warm attitudes to Macronism (a big ask) and allow his would-be successors in the Centre to block Marine Le Pen in 2027.

Otherwise, Le Pen’s zombie economics – extra spending, no new taxes, breaking the European single market – could tip a heavily indebted France into the abyss.

SHOW COMMENTS