SHARE
COPY LINK

WOMEN'S DAY

Should Spain’s govt have allowed Women’s Day march on eve of outbreak?

Spain's left-wing government was facing growing pressure Wednesday after a damning report emerged criticising its decision to permit a huge March 8th Women's Day rally in Madrid as the epidemic gathered pace.

Should Spain's govt have allowed Women's Day march on eve of outbreak?
Photo: AFP

Spain has suffered one of the most-deadly outbreaks of the virus that has so far killed more than 27,000 people, with the battle to contain the epidemic becoming increasingly politicised.   

As the country began a 10-day mourning period to grieve the victims, a storm of controversy blew up around Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska for sacking a top Madrid police chief who oversaw the report, prompting calls for his resignation.

The dispute centres on a case recently opened by an investigating magistrate following a private complaint over the government's handling of the crisis in Madrid, the epicentre of the epidemic. 

A key question in the investigation, which is looking into suspicions of possible administrative misconduct, is whether the government should have let the International Women's Day rally go ahead.

The march was attended by 120,000 people including many members of Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez's government, with three ministers later testing positive for the virus.


Tens of thousands of people gathered for the march through Madrid. Photo: AFP

 

As part of the probe, the magistrate commissioned a report from the city's Guardia Civil police, and has summoned Jose Manuel Franco, the government representative in Madrid, to appear on June 5 to explain why he let the march
and other events go ahead.   

According to the report, a copy of which was seen by AFP, Franco's department “was aware of the danger involved” in holding such a rally.    

At the time, the epidemic was already under way but the scope of it only began to emerge on March 9 when the numbers shot up and Madrid said it was shutting down all the region's schools.

Five days later, the government declared a strict nationwide lockdown to slow the spread of the virus.

'Thousands of lives put at risk'

“We demand you take responsibility for subverting the judicial independence of the investigation into alleged crimes on March 8th when thousands of lives were put at risk,” opposition leader Pablo Casado of the right-wing Popular
Party charged on Wednesday.   

The Guardia Civil report also criticised the health ministry's emergencies coordinator Fernando Simón for not advising against the rally, while privately telling an evangelical churches' representative that “under no circumstances” should they hold a congress with international visitors.


A woman wears a mask during the march in Madrid. Photo: AFP

But Simón brushed off the criticism, telling reporters on Tuesday the impact of the march was “marginal” on a weekend when the city also hosted a football match, public transport was running normally and the far-right Vox held a rally of 9,000 people after which several of its leaders tested positive.

The increase seen on March 9th “is not attributable to the (previous) weekend” but to cases that would have been transmitted at the end of February, taking into account the incubation period, he said.   

The impact of that weekend would have been seen “perhaps 16 or 17 days later, but no specific increase was noted in that period,” he adding: “What we saw was the expected evolution of the curve.”

The minister responds

On Monday, Grande-Marlaska dismissed Diego Perez de los Cobos, head of the Guardia Civil in Madrid who was responsible for the report.   

“The executive cannot impose pressure like this,” Jose Cobo of the Spanish Guardia Civil Association told AFP, saying he suspected the minister knew about the report.

Quizzed over the move in parliament on Wednesday, Grande-Marlaska, a former anti-terror judge, rejected the allegations, saying the dismissal was part of a planned reshuffle in the Guardia Civil leadership and denying he had access to the report.

“There has not been any interference with any other power of state and there will never be as long as I am interior minister,” he said.

By AFP's Álvaro Villalobos 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

COVID-19

Public Health Agency recommends two Covid doses next year for elderly

Sweden's Public Health Agency is recommending that those above the age of 80 should receive two doses of a Covid-19 vaccine a year, once in the spring and once in the autumn, as it shifts towards a longer-term strategy for the virus.

Public Health Agency recommends two Covid doses next year for elderly

In a new recommendation, the agency said that those living in elderly care centres, and those above the age of 80 should from March 1st receive two vaccinations a year, with a six month gap between doses. 

“Elderly people develop a somewhat worse immune defence after vaccination and immunity wanes faster than among young and healthy people,” the agency said. “That means that elderly people have a greater need of booster doses than younger ones. The Swedish Public Health Agency considers, based on the current knowledge, that it will be important even going into the future to have booster doses for the elderly and people in risk groups.” 

READ ALSO: 

People between the ages of 65 and 79 years old and young people with risk factors, such as obesity, diabetes, poor kidney function or high blood pressure, are recommended to take one additional dose per year.

The new vaccination recommendation, which will start to apply from March 1st next year, is only for 2023, Johanna Rubin, the investigator in the agency’s vaccination programme unit, explained. 

She said too much was still unclear about how long protection from vaccination lasted to institute a permanent programme.

“This recommendation applies to 2023. There is not really an abundance of data on how long protection lasts after a booster dose, of course, but this is what we can say for now,” she told the TT newswire. 

It was likely, however, that elderly people would end up being given an annual dose to protect them from any new variants, as has long been the case with influenza.

SHOW COMMENTS