SHARE
COPY LINK

HEALTH

Why the coronavirus could again make Lucerne the capital of Switzerland

The fallout from the coronavirus could have an unlikely consequence, with lockdown measures forcing the government to shift the capital from Bern to Lucerne - albeit temporarily.

Why the coronavirus could again make Lucerne the capital of Switzerland
Photo by Oleg Magni from Pexels

The Swiss national parliament is next scheduled to meet in June for its summer session – however will be unable to fit within Bern’s Bundeshaus due to official social distancing rules. 

As it stands, only 41 of the 200 National Council members will be able to enter the Bundeshaus. 

As reported in the Neue Zürcher Zeitung, an offer from Lucerne could see the small city become the nation’s capital for the second time – albeit only for 21 days. 

Sensing an opportunity, the larger Lucerne Exhibition Centre offered to host the annual gathering, providing an outline of how social distance requirements could be complied with. 

The city and the canton have also signed on to support the project. Besides giving the city temporary ‘capital’ status, the move would also boost the city’s flagging hotel industry which has suffered significantly due to the coronavirus. 

It is not the first time, however, that Lucerne has been the capital of Switzerland. 

In 1798, Napoleon and his invading forces deemed the city to be the capital of the Helvetic Republic, before shifting the official capital to Bern in mid-1799. 

Although Switzerland does not have an official capital, Bern is considered a ‘federal city’ and therefore noted to be the country’s de facto seat of government. 

As reported in the NZZ, this would give Lucerne ‘federal city’ status – at least for the 21-day duration of the summer sessions. 

The decision as to where the summer sessions will take place will be made on May 1st by the Federal Council. 

 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

HEALTH INSURANCE

Could glasses and contact lenses soon be covered by Swiss health insurance?

The Swiss health system is ranked among the best in the world, but some essentials, like glasses, aren't automatically covered by health insurance. That could soon change, however

Could glasses and contact lenses soon be covered by Swiss health insurance?

Green Party Federal Councillor Katharina Prelicz-Huber revealed in an interview with newspaper 20 Minuten this week that the Federal Parliament had tabled a motion to include prescription glasses and contact lenses in Switzerland’s mandatory health insurance scheme. 

Prelicz-Huber stated: “The purpose of compulsory health insurance is to provide the services you need to get or stay healthy,”

The motion forms part of the legislation that will be voted on during the 2024 summer session of the Federal Council. 

Proposed changes 

According to Switzerland’s peak optician body, 4 in 5 Swiss wear glasses or contact lenses at some point. 

It’s no surprise that statistics repository, Statista, projects the Swiss eyewear industry to be worth €1.37 billion by 2028. 

Currently, glasses and contact lenses are covered for up to 180 francs for children until age eighteen, if they are proscribed by a doctor.

Adults can also claim money back for glasses and contact lenses – however, they must be suffering from one of a short list of specific conditions such as keratoconus – where the cornea is distorted – or severe myopia, otherwise known as near-sightedness.

They must also have been specifically prescribed them by a doctor or optometrist. 

Otherwise, supplemental optical insurance must be purchased in Switzerland to ensure you can recoup the cost. 

Under the Green Party proposal, glasses, contact lenses, and other visual aids would be covered, regardless of age. 

Rising premiums prompt opposition 

Not everybody agrees with the proposal. 

The right-wing SVP has already spoken out against it, with Federal Councillor Diana Gutjahr arguing: “If we seriously want to slow down the burdensome and constantly rising health costs for the benefit of the population, we [must] show the political will not to constantly expand the benefits of compulsory health insurance.”

A spokesman for the the health insurance advocacy group Santesuisse, Matthias Müller, echoed Gutjahr, claiming that insurance constitutes “financing for extraordinary events such as illness.”

“If almost everyone benefits from a certain service, it is no longer an insurance benefit.”

A date for the vote has yet to be announced. 

SHOW COMMENTS