SHARE
COPY LINK

EUROPEAN ELECTIONS

EXPLAINED: What’s at stake for France and Macron in the EU elections?

There's a great deal at stake in this weekend's crucial European elections for France and its President Emmanuel Macron. Hence why Donald Trump's former strategist Steve Bannon is getting involved.

EXPLAINED: What's at stake for France and Macron in the EU elections?
Photo: AFP

The European elections are fast approaching and no doubt French President Emmanuel Macron is keeping an eager on the polls as the threat of a win for Marine Le Pen's far right Rassemblement National (National Rally) seems increasingly plausible. 

On Sunday, political tensions soared in France just one week ahead of the tightly-contested elections, with Macron's party expressing unease over the presence of Donald Trump's controversial ex-strategist Steve Bannon. 

Bannon had told the newspaper Le Parisien on Saturday he had chosen to come to France as its election was “by far” the most important of all the European parliament polls in EU member states.

READ ALSO:

Why young French people don't care about the European electionsPhoto: stevanovicigor/Depositphotos

The head of the LREM campaign, Stephane Sejourne, on Twitter accused Bannon of coming to Paris and staying at a luxury hotel with the aim of helping Le Pen's party win.

But why is Macron and his party so concerned about losing the upcoming European elections?

Macron's vision for Europe

Political experts argue that a loss for Macron's party and a victory for the far right would show that his people do not support their leader's vision for Europe. And the French president has made no secret of the fact that he would like to create a deeper, stronger EU. 

Should Macron's La Republique En Marche (LREM) party fall behind the RN in the polls, it would be a major blow for the president whose supporters see him as Europe's centrist saviour against the surge of the far right across the continent.

Steve Bannon described the poll as a referendum on Macron and his vision for Europe, predicting an “earthquake” next Sunday.

And he isn't the only one who feels that way. 

“If the French do not vote for Macron's party in the European elections, it will be hard to convince anybody to follow his agenda for Europe,” said Bruno Cautrès, French political analyst from the Cevipof think tank. 

A win for the far right “would show the French now have a very pessimistic attitude towards the EU,” he said, adding that despite the polls all is not lost for Macron's party.

“A win for the Rassemblement National seems more plausible as time goes on but there are many among the electorate who have not chosen who to vote for yet,” he said, adding that according to the latest figures 40-45 percent of French people are planning to vote in the election.

That's compared to 44 percent in the last European elections in 2014 and 74.5 percent in the presidential elections two years ago.  

What you need to know about voting in the crucial European electionsPhoto: AFP

Turnout

While the French might not be about to turn out at the polls in the droves, Cautrès said that “doesn't mean the French aren't interested in the EU.”

“The French are interested in the European Union,” he said, adding that according to a recent poll 36 percent of French people said they were “very interested” in the election campaign and 38 percent said they were “mostly interested”. 

So, why this disparity between how the country feels about the EU and how many are likely to vote?

Cautrès says there are a few reasons for this, one of which is that the European elections are “very complicated”. 

“Once you've elected someone it can be hard to understand exactly what their role is in the European parliament. This is still true in spite of the fact the European elections have been going on for 40 years.”

Some have said that young French voters are particularly disillusioned with the European elections, with fewer than one in four of planning to vote in them. 

Several reasons for this have been suggested, including that young people in France are pessimistic about the future of Europe and that they don't see Europe as necessarily as glamorous as America and Australia, however Cautrès said that it's important to avoid looking at young French people “as all the same”. 

“Young people who are unemployed or living in a rural area are more likely to see the EU as failing them whereas those who are more prosperous and living in cities are far less likely to feel that way.” 

Does the result really matter?

Some believe that a win for Marine Le Pen's party would mean very much at all – after all, the previous incarnation of the National Rally party – the National Front – won the European elections back in 2014. 

“Given the anti-Macron mood of much of the country, Marine Le Pen's own party's performance in this European campaign has been limp and unthreatening. She has failed to make electoral gains from the Gilets Jaunes movement,” writes veteran France correspondent John Lichfield for The Local.
 
“But this year is not a normal year. A defeat for the President on 26 May, however narrow, would bolster claims by Gilets Jaunes and others that Macron is somehow an accidental and illegitimate president. It might reignite what appears to be a fading Yellow Vest rebellion.”

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

EU ELECTIONS

Erna Solberg interview: ‘Benefits of Norway’s relationship with EU far outweigh downsides

In an interview with the organisation Faces of Democracy, Norway's Prime Minister Erna Solberg answers questions on the country's relationship with the EU, right-wing populist movements and Norway's future role in the world.

Erna Solberg interview: 'Benefits of Norway's relationship with EU far outweigh downsides
Erna Solberg with Faces of Democracy's Sven Lilienström. Photo: Rune Hammerstad

 

Q. Norway is not an EU member state. However, it is part of the European Economic Area – which has existed since 1994 – and is also a Schengen member state. How important to your country is a close partnership with the EU?

It's very important from an economic perspective. We conducted a major review of the EEA Agreement – our economic link – through a major commission that was, I believe, established ten years ago. The commission’s findings showed that the benefits are much greater than the problems. While there are downsides to the type of relationship we have with the EU, the benefits far outweigh them.

These benefits are primarily close cooperation for businesses and enhanced market opportunities. Norway, and in fact all of the Scandinavian countries, have accepted the most labour migrants from other European countries. But workers from the EU countries have contributed to the economic growth of our country. I think this is the reason why EU labourmigration hasn’t created the same kind of friction as in other countries.

There are challenges in the labour market; there are challenges with shady businesses that do not comply with our labour market rules and regulations and therefore compete unfairly’, we need to address the problem of social dumping, which is an area where we would like to see closer European cooperation to stop border-crossing crime.

Still, the overall picture is that the EEA agreement ensures opportunities for our businesses, it maintains welfare standards for our society and it boosts job creation. It also ensures a high degree of cooperation between the Norwegian non-governmental sector and the non-governmental sectors of other countries. This is especially true of the Central European countries. This is because our financial contribution through the EEA and Norway grants foster closer cooperation between organizations in the former Eastern European countries.

 

Right-wing populist movements are gaining ground in parts of Europe and are also present in Norway. Do you consider the populists to be more of a risk or rather a potentially corrective force for democracy in your country?-

I believe that you should always have respect for people’s votes and opinions. In my government, we have a faction that is to the right of the conservative party, or more liberalist-leaning. In my opinion however, this is not the sort of right-wing political faction that exists in other countries, although it has traditionally been stricter on migration than other parties in Norway. But, being a liberalist faction, it naturally tends towards lower taxation and the party is absolutely within the spectrum of European mainstream politics.

One disturbing thing is hate speech in social media. This is causing changes, not so much in politics, but by creating a toxic debate climate in Norwegian social media. This is challenging because we are seeing increased Islamophobia and increased scepticism towards migration, linked with anti-climate policies and EU scepticism. All of this sometimes gives rise to a very toxic debate in social media.

Yesterday we had a large civil rally aimed at stopping hate speech and to encourage more moderate discussions in social media. I’m not sure that it will help, but it does give stimulus to those who want a more respectful form of debate on Facebook and other social media sites.

According to the current “Global Gender Gap Report”, Norway ranks second in terms of the gender pay gap. What can other countries learn from Norway to help them close their gender pay gaps?

There are different reasons why we have a narrower gender pay gap. We have a system of laws and regulations and if you consider women and men in the same type of jobs, they are mostly equally paid. But we still have a difference between different sectors that require the same level of responsibilities and education or training; there is still a gap here. Still, the true gap facing us is between different sectors. 

But I do think that having unions that focus on equal pay is important. We have an ombudsman system and an anti-discrimination act that allows workers to complain to their ombudsman or anti-discrimination committee that they are not receiving equal pay.

Companies in Norway are also obliged to report on their anti-discrimination activities to ensure that equal rights are observed. All of this places the focus of business thinking on asking why their payrolls exhibit different pay for men and women. 

Ms. Prime Minister, your second term in office ends in 2021. Which issues are still on your political and personal agenda and what is your vision for Norway’s future role in the world?

That’s quite a question! In Norway we’ve been through a situation where we have experienced an economic downturn because of the drop in the oil price. Our economy showed that it had the strength and resilience to bounce back after an increased unemployment and we have now become more competitive in the oil and gas sector.

The great challenge facing Norway is that the oil and gas sector will contribute less to our growth because our oil and gas investments and production are currently peaking, so output will be reduced in the future. Oil and gas will, however, remain a major industry in Norway for a long time – but that's not where we are going to keep focusing.

So we will be facing the same issues as most other European countries. How can we create more jobs in a more competitive and globalized world? How can we make sure that we are creating new jobs if we will be losing a small number of jobs every year in the oil and gas sector? The solution is about education. It's about investment in research & development. It's about the framework for businesses and start-ups in our country.

The interview with the Norwegian Prime Minister was first published on the site Faces of Democracy. You can read the full version HERE.

SHOW COMMENTS