SHARE
COPY LINK

TWITTER

Swedish journalists hijacked on Twitter

Several well-known journalists in Sweden have had their identities falsely used on Twitter to broadcast a slew of racist remarks.

Swedish journalists hijacked on Twitter

The social media highjackings took place Friday when someone initiated accounts on the micro-blog Twitter and used identities similar to those of well-known Swedish journalists, according to Sveriges Television (SVT).

Among those affected include TV4’s Lena Sundström, magazine Expos Alexander Bengtsson and Aftonbladet editor Jan Helin.

The alter-ego posts, or tweets, exhume xenophobic and racist banter, such as “Do you want a job as an editorial writer at Aftonbladet? Unfortunately, we only hire white ethnic Swedes and hypocrites,” reported SVT.

Other tweets tended to be more explicit in their racial content making reference to Islam and suicide bombers.

“Twitter is an amazing medium that provides a lot of opportunities, but there is a dark backside when it is abused like this,” Helin told SVT.

Twitter hijacking is not an uncommon assault. Hijackers use the same name, image and title to mimic those they wish to scorch and slander.

For example, Jan Helin’s alter ego employed both the same image and title, Editor of Aftonbladet, but the only difference between the two on-line identities is an underscore between his first and last names.

The real Twitter accounts of the journalists appear as #LenaSundstrom, #AlexBengtsson and #JanHelin.

Although the tweet contents were erased Friday, the highjacked accounts were still present Saturday morning.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

DISCRIMINATION

Twitter appeals French court ruling on hate speech transparency

Twitter has appealed a French court decision that ordered it to give activists full access to all of its relevant documents on efforts to fight hate speech, lawyers and a judicial source said on Saturday.

Twitter appeals French court ruling on hate speech transparency
The Twitter logo is seen on a phone. Twitter has appealed a French court judgement requiring it to share documents with activist groups. Photo: Alastair Pike / AFP

In July, a French court ordered Twitter to grant six French anti-discrimination groups full access to all documents relating to the
company’s efforts to combat hate speech since May 2020. The ruling applied to Twitter’s global operation, not just France.

Twitter has appealed the decision and a hearing has been set for December 9, 2021, a judicial source told AFP, confirming information released by the groups’ lawyers.

Twitter and its lawyers declined to comment.

The July order said that Twitter must hand over “all administrative, contractual, technical or commercial documents” detailing the resources it has assigned to fight homophobic, racist and sexist discourse on the site, as well as the offence of “condoning crimes against humanity”.

It also said Twitter must reveal how many moderators it employs in France to examine posts flagged as hateful, and data on the posts they process.

READ ALSO: French court orders Twitter to change smallprint over ‘abusive’ methods

The July ruling gave the San Francisco-based company two months to comply. Twitter can ask for a suspension pending the appeal.

The six anti-discrimination groups had taken Twitter to court in France last year, accusing the US social media giant of “long-term and persistent” failures in blocking hateful comments from the site.

The groups campaign against homophobia, racism and anti-Semitism. Twitter’s hateful conduct policy bans users from promoting violence or threatening or attacking people based on their race, religion, gender identity or disability, among other forms of discrimination.

Like other social media giants it allows users to report posts they believe are hateful, and employs moderators to vet the content.

But anti-discrimination groups have long complained that holes in the policy allow hateful comments to stay online in many cases.

SHOW COMMENTS