SHARE
COPY LINK

POLITICS

France ‘stabbed in back’ by Australia over submarine deal, says minister

France's foreign minister expressed his anger on Thursday over Australia's surprise decision to scrap a huge submarines deal in favour of nuclear-powered subs from the US.

France 'stabbed in back' by Australia over submarine deal, says minister
Foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian. Photo: Karim Jaafar/AFP

“It’s really a stab in the back. We had established a relationship of trust with Australia, this trust has been betrayed,” Jean-Yves Le Drian told France Info radio.

“I’m very angry today, and bitter… This is not something allies do to each other,” he said.

“This sudden and unforeseeable decision very much recalls what Mr Trump would do,” Le Drian added, referring to the previous US president Donald Trump.

US President Joe Biden announced Wednesday a new defence pact with Australia and Britain that would see Canberra get a nuclear-powered submarine fleet, a privilege reserved for few American allies.

The move underscore increasing concerns about China’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific region, where France is also looking to protect its interests that include the overseas territories of New Caledonia.

Defence Minister Florence Parly on Thursday called Australia’s about-face “very bad news with regards to keeping one’s word,” while adding that France is “clear-eyed as to how the United States treats its allies.”

“In terms of geopolitics and international relations, it’s serious,” she told RFI radio.

Member comments

  1. I think one of the problems here was that what the French called ‘the contract of the century’ looked like it was going to take a century to deliver. I can see why the French feel let down though as there must have been a lot of Australian/ US/UK double-talk and double dealing going on in the last few months. Maybe, however, Australia felt emboldened to act that way when the EU confiscated their vaccines. Just a thought.

    1. Sounds like a new geo-political alliance is forming. US – Aus – UK. Could call it the Fox/Murdoch-media-market Alliance.

  2. Giving one’s word in a business deal and then abruptly going back on it is a lesson in survival for the most resilient and best prepared.

    As a retired American twenty year expatriate in France , I encourage my adopted country to move toward increased autonomy from the United States.

    The whole point of the European Union is to provide economic and military independence for its members. Let’s not let anything interfere with that goal!

    1. I should add that not having a back up plan ready in the event of disaster is not being fully prepared!

      Michael Kittle
      Vaison la Romaine
      France

    2. It was never the point of the EU to be a military alliance. Not least because they have no common foreign policy , 4 of its members are neutral, and 7 of its members were part of the Soviet bloc not so long ago.

        1. You may get your wish as it looks like there will be a drive for an EU army under the French EU presidency next year. For most of the countries of the EU , however, less dependence on NATO means more dependency on France and Germany. Do you really imagine that’s what most of them want ? There are three nuclear powers in NATO – so would Hungary, for example, feel safer swapping that for a single French nuclear umbrella and military defence getting mixed up in all the usual domestic , economic squabbling of the EU.

          1. The devil is in the details.

            A stronger European Union is the obvious solution for having weak or unreliable allies!

  3. Most of my fellow Americans are not aware of the deep seated relationship between France and the United States.

    Without financial and military assistance from France the American Revolutionary War would not have succeeded.

    We Americans owe our very existence to past french governments!

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

PARIS 2024 OLYMPICS

Factcheck: Is France really trying to ban speaking English at the Paris Olympics?

A resolution by a group of French MPs to 'say non to English at the Paris Olympics' has generated headlines - but will athletes and visitors really be required to speak French?

Factcheck: Is France really trying to ban speaking English at the Paris Olympics?

In a resolution adopted on Thursday, France’s Assemblée Nationale urged organisers of the 2024 Paris Games, as well as athletes, trainers and journalists, to use French as much as possible.

Annie Genevard, the sponsor of the resolution from the right-wing Les Républicains party, expressed alarm to fellow MPs that “the Olympic Games reflect the loss of influence of our language.”

The French MP’s resolution has garnered headlines, but does it actually mean anything?

Citing examples of English slogans in international sport, she added: “The fight for the French language … is never finished, even in the most official spheres.

“Let’s hope that ‘planche a roulettes’ replaces skateboard and ‘rouleau du cap’ point break (a surfing term), but I have my doubts.”

She’s right to doubt it – in French the skateboarding event is ‘le skateboard’, while the new addition of break-dancing is ‘le breaking‘.

But what does this actually mean?

In brief, not a lot. This is a parliamentary resolution, not a law, and is totally non-binding.

The Games are organised by the International Olympic Committee, the Paris 2024 Organising Committee and Paris City Hall – MPs do not have a role although clearly the Games must follow any French domestic laws that parliament passes.

The French parliament has got slightly involved with security issues for the Games, passing laws allowing for the use of enhanced security and surveillance measures including the use of facial recognition and drone technology that was previously outlawed in France.

So what do the Olympic organisers think of English?

The Paris 2024 organisers have shown that they have no problem using English – which is after all one of the two official languages of the Olympics. The other being French.

The head of the organising committee Tony Estanguet speaks fluent English and is happy to do so while official communications from the Games organisers – from social media posts to the ticketing website – are all available in both French and English.

Even the slogan for the Games is in both languages – Ouvrir grand les jeux/ Games wide open (although the pun only really works in French).

In fact the Games organisers have sometimes drawn criticism for their habit (common among many French people, especially younger ones) of peppering their French with English terms, from “le JO-bashing” – criticism of the Olympics – to use of the English “challenges” rather than the French “defis”.

The 45,000 Games volunteers – who are coming from dozens of countries – are required only to speak either French or English and all information for volunteers has been provided in both languages.

Paris local officials are also happy to use languages other than French and the extra signage that is going up in the city’s public transport system to help people find their way to Games venues is printed in French, English and Spanish.

Meanwhile public transport employees have been issued with an instant translation app, so that they can help visitors in multiple languages.

In short, visitors who don’t speak French shouldn’t worry too much – just remember to say bonjour.

Official language  

So why is French an official language of the Olympics? Well that’s easy – the modern Games were the invention of a Frenchman, the aristocrat Pierre de Coubertin, in the late 19th century.

Some of his views – for example that an Olympics with women would be “impractical, uninteresting (and) unaesthetic” – have thankfully been consigned to the dustbin of history, but his influence remains in the language.

The International Olympic Committee now has two official languages – English and French.

Official communications from the IOC are done in both languages and announcements and speeches at the Games (for example during medal ceremonies) are usually done in English, French and the language of the host nation, if that language is neither English nor French.

SHOW COMMENTS