SHARE
COPY LINK

BUSINESS

‘It’s a shit show’: How one Gothenburg business is struggling under post-Brexit bureaucracy

Two weeks ago a 100,000-kronor shipment of crisps, chocolate and tea was nearly destroyed at the port of Gothenburg. 

The British Shop
The British Shop in Gothenburg is still waiting for stock. Photo: Rosie McClune

There was nothing wrong with the food, but it came from the UK and according to post-Brexit EU regulations, any consignment of food from outside the European Union has to undergo document and identity checks in customs before being allowed to enter an EU country. 

Due to an error in how the pallets were marked, (they weren’t marked with ‘border control’) the food was moved to a warehouse without being approved by customs at the port. 

The business who bought the shipment, The British Shop in Gothenburg, was given two options: either destroy the entire shipment or send it back to the UK. They are just one of the small businesses affected by a lack of information on post-Brexit imports.

“We knew [Brexit] was going to be tough but it’s just been impossible to get anything done,”  said Rosie McClune, one of the owners of the shop. 

“Usually an order would take five days and now it’ll take five weeks to get here,” McClune told The Local. The shop was expecting the delivery on May 24th.

The British treats and condiments they sell are very popular with the English-speaking immigrant community in Gothenburg. But lack of stock meant the shop had to close over the weekend.

After waiting five weeks and hiring customs agents to make sure all the paperwork is in order, the shop still hasn’t been able to receive their goods and shelves are getting emptier. 

A recent survey from the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise (Svenskt Näringsliv) found that 80 percent of Swedish companies which trade with the UK have had or expect problems with post-Brexit bureaucracy.

More than 40 percent of the companies said they’ve experienced or expect major problems with customs duties. 

Henrik Isakson, manager for trade policy at the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise, said that “it’s all about people in the end, who might interpret legislation in different ways.” 

It’s nothing new that businesses are struggling because of Brexit, but this situation is “just a big shit-show,” as McClune put it. 

Even the Queen is disgruntled by the lack of tea available on shelves at The British Shop in Gothenburg. Photo: Rosie McClune.

The shop has had to reach out to the British Ambassador for help. While McClune says that the Embassy has been really helpful, she said the Swedish administrators don’t know the new rules.

“This just can’t go on, not just for us but for everyone,” McClune said. “It’s just so stupid the whole thing. I hate Brexit.”

Annika Sundström, Head of Border Control at Livsmedelsverket (the Swedish Food Agency), said food customs agents are just following the same EU rules as every member state. 

“If consignments with food products are entering the EU territory without the mandatory border controls, the only option is a rejection of the consignment,” she said.

Sundström couldn’t comment on this particular case but told The Local that it’s very important that anyone planning on importing products from the UK to the EU, “informs themselves in detail about the rules before they order goods.”

Unless you’re fluent in EU trade policy jargon and laws, the information available on the Swedish Food Agency website is quite hard to digest. Certain links are broken and information isn’t always current. 

“They don’t have a clue and neither do we,” McClune says. “They assume everybody is up on the lingo.”

Even the experts struggle. 

Christopher Wingård from Sweden’s National Board of Trade says that the transition has been anything but smooth. “The first couple of months since Brexit have been very difficult for many companies, both in Sweden and in the UK. Since the agreement came late on Christmas Eve, there was essentially no time to prepare, for anyone,” he told The Local. 

“When everyone is faced with an entirely new situation on a short notice, it is not surprising that there are issues,” Wingård added. 

He says that smaller businesses have been hit harder.

“The EU rules for importing food are very strict and difficult to deal with, especially for small and medium sized companies,” he said.

It takes a while of digging through the website of the Swedish National Board of Trade (Kommerskollegium) to find out what rules apply. Non-EU goods need to be pre-registered before they arrive and before the rules changed in April, you needed an export health certificate for foods that contain animal by-products. Now, instead, you need to provide private attestations for those products.

Most of the snacks The British Shop are currently trying to import contain a very small percentage of dried milk or egg product – some as little as 0.35 percent – but they still count as composite products of animal origin. 

As a result, the Swedish Food Agency has asked them to complete private attestation forms on the origins of each individual ingredient before the shipment can be released. 

A screenshot of the attestation certification shows how detailed and lengthy the process can be. Photo: Screenshot

The EU is trying to make the process easier to understand with a website that lets you find the rules for a certain product, but it’s still quite cumbersome.

Each certificate is long and costs 1000 kronor to submit. Some of the details border on the ridiculous.  

“One of the questions is actually ‘please provide proof there’s no milk in this marmalade’,” McClune said.

She hopes that importing from Ireland might be a way to avoid the complex bureaucracy of ordering crisps and chocolate from Britain, but it’s more expensive and they can’t get all their customers’ favourite products.  

“Stuff like this is what kills businesses like ours,” the shop-owner said. 

At the time of writing, the shipment was still at the port as McClune and her colleagues try to handle the mountain of paperwork, but they hope it will be released in the next few days.  

In the meantime, they still have an empty shop. 

Member comments

  1. I wonder, when the dust settles, will Brits voting for Brexit think it helped or hurt Great Britain economically, and did their own economic situation improve as a result.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

TRAVEL NEWS

EES: Could the launch of Europe’s new border system be delayed again?

After being postponed several times already Europe's new biometric Entry/Exit border system (EES) is set to be rolled out in October, but with fears of lengthy queues, problems with a new app and demands for more time, could it be postponed again?

EES: Could the launch of Europe's new border system be delayed again?

Could the entry into operation of the EU entry/exit system (EES), the new biometric passport checks for non-EU citizens at the Schengen area’s external borders, be delayed yet again?

Originally planned for May 2022, EES has already been postponed many times.

The current launch date, set for October 2024, was chosen to avoid periods of peak traffic and France in particular had requested to avoid it being launched until after the Paris Olympics this summer.

When asked to confirm the October start date this week a spokesperson for the EU’s Commission told The Local that the “roadmap” for the EES IT system foresees it will be ready for Autumn 2024. But the actual start date, in other words, the day when passengers will have to register, would be confirmed nearer the time.

The spokesperson said: “The exact date will be determined by the European Commission and announced on the EES official website well in time for the start of operations.”

READ ALSO: Your key questions answered about Europe’s new EES passport checks

But the reasons are adding up to suggest an October start date is optimistic, perhaps even unlikely.

In the annual report on the ‘State of Schengen’ published last week, the European Commission spelt out that severe challenges remain if member states are to be ready on time.

“In 2023, efforts to ensure the entry into operation of the Entry-Exit System in the autumn of 2024 were accelerated… While important progress has been made across the Schengen area, some Member States are still falling behind, notably regarding the effective equipment of border crossing points. The Commission calls on all Member States to urgently accelerate preparations to ensure the timely implementation of the system…”

A map in the report shows that preparation is still “in progress” in 13 Schengen area countries, including Germany, Norway and Switzerland. “Outstanding issues” still impact Portugal, Malta and Bulgaria.

The state of play for the preparations for EES across EU and Schengen states. Image: European Commission.

There are also reports that EU heavyweight Germany is trying to persuade Brussels to delay.

Matthias Monroy, editor of the German civil rights journal Bürgerrechte & Polizei/CILIP claimed on his website that “the German government is lobbying in Brussels to postpone the date once again, as otherwise the German tests of the EES cannot be completed in full. Other EU countries are also behind schedule, with only eight of them having reported successful integration.”

Even on a French government website it talks of EES being rolled out some time “between the end of 2024 and 2025” rather than stating October 2024.

And according to recent media reports, French airports have been advised to be ready for November 6th, rather than October. 

READ ALSO: EES and Etias – what are the big upcoming travel changes in Europe?

A planned EU app, believed to be essential to the smooth operation of EES because it would allow non-EU visitors to register in advance of travel will not be ready, Gwendoline Cazenave, Managing Director of Eurostar International, the company operating train services via the Channel Tunnel, has told the BBC. The EU however insists the app does not need to be up and running before EES is introduced.

In the UK, which will be heavily impacted by EES due to the fact it is no longer in the EU and so British travellers are no longer EU citizens, the House of Commons European scrutiny committee is conducting an inquiry on the potential disruption the introduction of the EES will cause at the border.

Several respondents have recently raised the alarm about the possible delays the system could cause, especially at the UK-France border, which is used by millions of passengers each year who head to France and other countries across Europe.

Ashford Borough Council in Kent has warned of the possibility of more than 14 hours queues to reach the Port of Dover, which has already been struggling increased checked after Brexit.

The BBC reported that back in March, a P&O Ferries director said the IT system should be delayed again.

Airlines have also complained about the fact pre-travel EES requirements would make last minute bookings impossible.

The Union des Aéroports Français (UAF), which represents airports in France, has simply said more time is needed.

In other words, it would be little surprise if the roll out was delayed again beyond October 2024.

But the Commission spokesperson told The Local that “the timeline for the entry into operation of the EES took into account all the necessary activities to be performed by all relevant stakeholders to ensure a timely entry into operation. 

“The Commission is working very closely with eu-Lisa [the EU agency in charge of the IT system], the Member States and carriers to ensure that everything is ready for the timely and successful launch of the Entry Exit System.

“The roadmap for the delivery of the new IT architecture foresees that the Entry/Exit system will be ready to enter into operation in Autumn 2024.”

New digital border

The EES is a digital system to register travellers from non-EU countries when they cross a border in or out of the Schengen area, the travel-free area. It will be deployed in 29 countries across Europe including 25 EU states plus Norway, Switzerland, Iceland and Liechtenstein. Ireland and Cyprus are the only EU members who won’t apply the EES system.

It doesn’t apply to non-EU nationals who are legally resident in an EU/Schengen area country or those with dual nationality of an EU /Schengen county. The system was designed to increase security and to ensure that non-EU nationals visiting the Schengen area short-term do not stay more than 90 days in any 180-day period.

Instead of having the passport stamped, travellers will have to scan it at self-service kiosks before crossing the border. However, fingerprints and a photo will have to be registered in front of a guard at the first crossing and there are huge concerns the extra time needed could generate long queues in the UK, where there are juxtaposed border checks with the EU.

Preparations are ongoing throughout Europe and some countries have made good progress.

In France, Getlink, the operator of the Channel Tunnel, has recently reported that new EES infrastructure is finished at its French terminal of Coquelles, which will allow travellers to register their biometric data while travelling.

Eurostar is also installing 49 kiosks in stations for the registration of passengers. But the Union des Aéroports Français (UAF), which represents airports in France, said more time is needed.

Exempted

Meanwhile, the Polish government has urged UK citizens who are beneficiaries of the EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement to get a residence permit “in the context of EES/ETIAS”, even though there was not such an obligation to stay legally in Poland post-Brexit.

“Having such a document is beneficial as it will exempt from future Entry/Exit System (EES) registration when crossing external borders and from the need to obtain an ETIAS travel permit in relation to short-term travel to EU/Schengen countries,” the government page says.

This article as published in collaboration with Europe Street news.

SHOW COMMENTS