SHARE
COPY LINK

PROPERTY

Danish government’s move against ‘rent increase’ housing speculation collapses

A proposal by the Danish government to legislate against big companies investing on rental housing, pushing up costs for tenants, has collapsed.

Danish government’s move against 'rent increase' housing speculation collapses
Housing minister Kaare Dybvad briefs media. Photo: Martin Sylvest/Ritzau Scanpix

After a breakdown in parliamentary negotiations, opposition parties and the centre-left Social Liberal (Radikale Venstre) have joined forces to block the government proposal from moving forward.

The opposing parties said in a statement that they want an intervention that will not negatively impact the value of existing housing, does not involve the state in financing renovations and does not affect cooperative housing [Danish: andelsboliger, ed.].

The opposition parties and the Social Liberals will seek to pass legislation to that end without government participation.

“We believe that such an intervention is realistic, and the Liberals, the Danish People's Party, the Social Liberals, the Conservative Party and Nye Borgelige (New Right) are therefore continuing the negotiations,” the parties wrote in a joint statement.

Together, the parties have 91 seats, enough to pass legislation in parliament.

A major obstacle in the negotiations was a proposed cooling-off period for rent increases, Ritzau writes.

The proposal would have meant that rents could not be increased due to renovations for seven years after a property has been sold. The intention of this was to prevent short-term speculation through buying a property, making renovations and then raising rents, generating a large return over a short time.

READ ALSO:

New regulation proposed by the government would have revolved around section 5.2 of the Danish Housing Regulations Act (boligreguleringsloven). The clause allows landlords to significantly raise rents in pre-1992 properties if 250,000 kroner is invested in the apartment.

Liberal party housing spokesperson Heidi Bank said that Minister for Transport and Housing Kaare Dybvad had “simply failed to find a majority” for the government plan.

At a press briefing earlier on Wednesday, Dybvad said the cooling-off period was the only measure that could stop short-term speculation on the rental housing market.

“We disagree on the speculative block aimed at short-term investors. My job is to ensure this, so I can't make a deal without it,” Dybvad said.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

SWISS ALPS

Why luxury Swiss mountain resorts are becoming ‘lifeless’

Properties are expensive — and getting even more so — in many parts of Switzerland. But the situation is especially dire in chic mountain resorts, where the cost of holiday apartments has soared substantially. This is having an impact on the local population.

Why luxury Swiss mountain resorts are becoming 'lifeless'

In the past several years, the already pricey holiday homes in the Swiss Alps have become 30 percent more expensive, according to a new UBS report analysing 140,000 properties in the mountain resorts of Switzerland, France, and Austria.

Swiss towns, however, are the most expensive of the lot, having taken nearly all the top spots in the ranking.

Verbier, in canton of Valais,  is in the first place — the price for a square metre of living space in this resort town now costs over 21,500 francs.

St. Moritz in Graubünden is a close second (21,200 francs for sq/m), followed by Zermatt (19, 900), Gstaad (19,700), and Andermatt (18,000).

By comparison, the per-square-metre price (in Swiss francs) in the most expensive ‘foreign’ resort — Kitzbühel, Austria — is 16,200, and in the highest-priced French resort, Courchevel, 13,500.

Mountain villages are certainly picturesque and offer many skiing and hiking opportunities for sports enthusiasts, but these are not the only reasons for the influx of well-heeled residents.

This trend took off during the Covid pandemic, when numerous city dwellers wanted to escape farther away into the ‘nature’ and be able to work from home.

What does this all mean?

Getting a top franc for their property is enticing to many homeowners, who can cash in and make a good profit.

And having affluent taxpayers move in boosts local economy, which means that everyone living in the community benefits at the end.
 
“This generally supports the municipal finances which, in turn, raises the scope for infrastructure investments and thus increases the attractiveness of a destination for second home owners,” UBS said in its report.

However,  like the proverbial double-edged sword, high property prices also have a negative side.

For instance, as the wealthy move in and prices go up, the lower and middle-class people who may have lived in these mountain communities for generations — running local shops, restaurants, ski lifts, and other essential businesses — can no longer afford to live there and are forced to move out.
 
While there are no official statistics  showing how many people move away from these resorts for financial reasons, anecdotal evidence indicates this phenomenon does exist. 

One of many such testimonies comes from Graubünden’s Engadin region. 

“Locals have sold historic Engadin houses to wealthy owners, who in turn converted them and used them as holiday homes, becoming popular retreats that are often empty in the off-season,” according to Anna Florin movement, which encourages villagers to withstand the pressure from the real estate agents to sell their properties.
 
 “Life in the village is therefore dwindling or disappearing completely.”

SHOW COMMENTS