SHARE
COPY LINK
ANALYSIS

POLITICS

Rocky six months for new Swedish PM Löfven

The Swedish centre-left coalition government's first six months in power since last year's general election have not been the whopping success that Prime Minister Stefan Löfven had been hoping for.

Rocky six months for new Swedish PM Löfven
Swedish PM Stefan Löfven on a visit to the US. AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

Only a few of the 40-50 promises in the Social Democrat election manifesto have so far been pushed through, such as recognizing Palestine, and appointing an innovation committee and an energy commission.

However, other plans have run to a grinding halt, the most prominent of which was when the government's first budget was voted down by parliament in December. Youth trainee jobs, raising unemployment benefits, and lowering taxes for pensioners are other proposals that have also not been implemented during the government's first six months in office.

This is a new situation for Löfven's Social Democrat Party, which had long enjoyed a strong position in Swedish politics before voters booted it in the 2006 election in favour of Fredrik Reinfeldt's right-wing coalition.

“The Social Democrats are quite used to successfully implementing the points in their election manifesto, but things are likely to look rather different going forward,” political scientist Elin Naurin told Swedish news wire TT.

Unlike previous Social Democratic governments, the party is now leading Sweden in a coalition with the Green Party. The minority government has found itself forced to negotiate with the Left Party to gain support on budget issues, which requires compromises.

A centre-left strategy to divide and rule among the opposition, hoping that the four parties in the right-wing alliance would go their separate ways after September's general election, has also failed to come to pass.

“In this way, Stefan Löfven finds himself in a completely different position to that of previous Social Democratic governments. It will be interesting to see how they manage the educational task of explaining this, both to the voters and to their own people,” said Naurin.

But the government has not been resting on its laurels. Löfven, who is hoping to get Sweden a seat on the UN Security Council, has clocked up a fair amount of air miles with an average of one trip abroad a week. Committees have been appointed and ministers have invited experts and industry professionals to pitch in on everything from the recent Saudi Arabia crisis to the problems of dairy farmers.

The government will get a new chance to perform in mid-April, when the spring budget is set to be presented. The right-wing alliance vowed in the so-called December Agreement when last year's budget crisis was resolved, to allow the government to get future budgets through parliament. And the government is now in a hurry to bring as much of that which was thwarted last year back on to the agenda.

Löfven has highlighted his plans for a '90-day guarantee' for unemployed youths to get a foot on the jobs ladder as one of the most important proposals. 32,000 trainee jobs were promised during the election campaign, but it is unclear how quickly local authorities will deliver.

Another one of the big promises is the government's vow to abolish 'Phase 3' ('Fas 3'), part of the jobs and development guarantee policy which the former centre-right Alliance government introduced in 2007, for 36,000 long-term unemployed. But in the government's budget, which was voted down last year, funds had been allocated to create no more than 4,400 jobs to replace Phase 3.

“We will put all our efforts into working on this. It's not the resources that are going to be a problem, it's finding work duties for these people,” TT quoted Finance Minister Magdalena Andersson as saying.

In search for funds to carry out reforms, Löfven has broken two of his other election pledges – the promise not to raise fuel tax and the vow not to touch the tax deduction for home renovations (ROT). Both are set to be executed in 2016 to increase tax revenue.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

POLITICS

‘Very little debate’ on consequences of Sweden’s crime and migration clampdown

Sweden’s political leaders are putting the population’s well-being at risk by moving the country in a more authoritarian direction, according to a recent report.

'Very little debate' on consequences of Sweden's crime and migration clampdown

The Liberties Rule of Law report shows Sweden backsliding across more areas than any other of the 19 European Union member states monitored, fuelling concerns that the country risks breaching its international human rights obligations, the report says.

“We’ve seen this regression in other countries for a number of years, such as Poland and Hungary, but now we see it also in countries like Sweden,” says John Stauffer, legal director of the human rights organisation Civil Rights Defenders, which co-authored the Swedish section of the report.

The report, compiled by independent civil liberties groups, examines six common challenges facing European Union member states.

Sweden is shown to be regressing in five of these areas: the justice system, media environment, checks and balances, enabling framework for civil society and systemic human rights issues.

The only area where Sweden has not regressed since 2022 is in its anti-corruption framework, where there has been no movement in either a positive or negative direction.

Source: Liberties Rule of Law report

As politicians scramble to combat an escalation in gang crime, laws are being rushed through with too little consideration for basic rights, according to Civil Rights Defenders.

Stauffer cites Sweden’s new stop-and-search zones as a case in point. From April 25th, police in Sweden can temporarily declare any area a “security zone” if there is deemed to be a risk of shootings or explosive attacks stemming from gang conflicts.

Once an area has received this designation, police will be able to search people and cars in the area without any concrete suspicion.

“This is definitely a piece of legislation where we see that it’s problematic from a human rights perspective,” says Stauffer, adding that it “will result in ethnic profiling and discrimination”.

Civil Rights Defenders sought to prevent the new law and will try to challenge it in the courts once it comes into force, Stauffer tells The Local in an interview for the Sweden in Focus Extra podcast

He also notes that victims of racial discrimination at the hands of the Swedish authorities had very little chance of getting a fair hearing as actions by the police or judiciary are “not even covered by the Discrimination Act”.

READ ALSO: ‘Civil rights groups in Sweden can fight this government’s repressive proposals’

Stauffer also expresses concerns that an ongoing migration clampdown risks splitting Sweden into a sort of A and B team, where “the government limits access to rights based on your legal basis for being in the country”.

The report says the government’s migration policies take a “divisive ‘us vs them’ approach, which threatens to increase rather than reduce existing social inequalities and exclude certain groups from becoming part of society”.

Proposals such as the introduction of a requirement for civil servants to report undocumented migrants to the authorities would increase societal mistrust and ultimately weaken the rule of law in Sweden, the report says.

The lack of opposition to the kind of surveillance measures that might previously have sparked an outcry is a major concern, says Stauffer.

Politicians’ consistent depiction of Sweden as a country in crisis “affects the public and creates support for these harsh measures”, says Stauffer. “And there is very little talk and debate about the negative consequences.”

Hear John Stauffer from Civil Rights Defender discuss the Liberties Rule of Law report in the The Local’s Sweden in Focus Extra podcast for Membership+ subscribers.

SHOW COMMENTS