Europe's news in English

COPY LINK

POLITICS

Only a quarter of Austrian MPs full time

The majority of Austrian MPs have one or more paid part-time jobs, according to a transparency list published by parliament.

Published: 1 July 2014 10:08 CEST

Only a quarter of Austrian MPs full time

A meeting of the national council in the Austrian parliament. Photo: APA/ROLAND SCHLAGER

The top earning MPs, who take home an additional €10,000 after tax each month are People’s Party (ÖVP) members – followed by MPs from the Freedom Party (FPÖ) and Socialist Party (SPÖ).

MPs receive €8,440 gross per month as their state salary – and roughly how much money they earn from other work is now available to read on the parliament website.

MPs were asked to give details of all paid jobs and voluntary leadership roles, but need not fear full disclosure as the parliament website lists additional monthly income in five broad categories: up to €1,000, €1,001-3500, €3,501-7000, €7,001-10,000 and €10,000. It does not say how much an MP earned for an individual job, but just the overall sum.

The APA press agency reports that some MPs were worried that if they were earning too much they might be asked to resign, but that has not happened.

A year ago, only eight MPs had an additional income of over €10,000 – now there are ten. The number of MPs earning an additional €7,001-10,000 has increased from four to 14.

The ÖVP has four MPs in the top earning category, the FPÖ has three, and the SPÖ has two. The liberal NEOS party and the Greens party have the most full-time MPs. A total of 48 MPs received no extra income in 2013.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.

Become a Member to leave a comment.

What issues do Austrians care about the most?

On October 23rd, Austria’s will hold its parliamentary elections for the National Council. This election determines the 183 members of the National Council, which is the primary legislative body in the country.

The election to the National Council takes place every five years and it is the country’s most important election. Austrian citizens who are at least 16 years old on election day are entitled to vote.

With the upcoming election in mind, a recent survey conducted by Linz-based Market Institute on behalf of Der Standard, revealed which topics eligible voters in Austria consider the most important, and what actions they are willing to take to see changes taking place.

Better healthcare is top priority

The survey showed that Austrians prioritise improvements in the healthcare system the most. Around 82 percent believe that improving the healthcare system was an important political concern. This belief remains consistent across different age groups and political beliefs. However, the level of interest in healthcare improvements tends to increase with age.

Concerns surrounding the state of the ountry’s healthcare system have mounted in recent years. Austria is currently dealing with a serious staff shortage in the healthcare sector, meaning fewer available medical staff for patients. Additionally, the system faces new challenges arising from changes in doctors preferences and the limited number of contracts for practices with public healthcare funds. Many doctors prefer to work as private sector doctors, known as “Wahlarzt” in German, rather than having contracts with insurance-funded practices, where the doctors are referred to as “Alle Kassenarzt” in German.

In addition to healthcare, Austrians also prioritise a better education system (78 percent), fighting corruption (76 percent), fighting high prices and inflation (75 percent), maintaining neutrality (72 percent), reducing energy costs (70 percent), and better paid jobs (67 percent). Legalising cannabis ranks lowest in importance among respondents, with only 19 percent in favour.

But even if voters highlighted these issues as important, many revealed. they did not want to get involved politically themselves to make things better. Only about 35 percent of those who want to improve healthcare are ready to join efforts such as demonstrating, collecting signatures, or networking with others to make changes happen.

READ ALSO: EXPLAINED: How the Austrian healthcare system works

Niche topics create more motivation for mobilisation

The survey showed the level of public engagement varied depending on the issue.

From the subjects mentioned above, only two – neutrality and energy costs, have the potential to persuade people to get involved in politics. Since those are niched topics they have potential to garner greater public support and engagement.

David Pfarrhofer, political researcher at Market Institute, suggested that niche topics often mobilise members of the public more than broader issues due to their specific focus and great relevance to smaller groups of people.

Political views influence opinions

Political party connections affect how Austrians view different social issues. While many supporters from different parties agree on protesting against right-wing extremism and supporting rights to free abortion, opinions on other matters such as reducing working hours, improving the military, climate change activism and immigration differ a lot among different political groups.

For example, while half of The Social Democratic Party (SPÖ) and a third of the The Green Party voters (Die Grünen) like the idea of working less, it is not popular among supporters of other parties, especially among those who support the Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP).

Another example is that two-thirds of respondents believe that protests against discrimination against women are justified. However, supporters of ÖVP and The Freedom Party (FPÖ) agree less with this statement than the other parties. “This is probably because many of them no longer consider such a disadvantage to exist,” says Pfarrhofer.

When it comes to protests against immigration, 84 percent of FPÖ supporters view protests against immigration as justified, meanwhile 52 percent of The Green Party supporters and 40 percent of SPÖ supporters reject such protests.

READ MORE: Healthcare in Austria: Why are there fewer ‘public’ doctors?

Url copied to clipboard!