SHARE
COPY LINK

OIL

Iraq tells Total: stop dealing with Kurds

Iraq on Sunday gave French energy giant Total an ultimatum to either end its dealings with the autonomous Kurdistan region in the north or to sell its stake in a giant southern oilfield.

Iraq's deputy prime minister responsible for energy affairs, Hussein al-Shahristani, also said Baghdad was considering offering foreign oil firms more lucrative contracts, as he admitted a recent auction of exploration blocks had not been as successful as officials had hoped.

Total "was requested to withdraw from this field, and it has been given a certain period to end this case by selling its share to another company or by
ending the contract with Kurdistan," Shahristani told AFP.

He did not specify the time by which Total, which said on July 31 that it signed an oil exploration deal with Kurdistan, needed to make a decision.

Kurdish authorities have signed dozens of deals with foreign energy firms on a production-sharing basis, contracts regarded as illegal by Baghdad which
insists all such deals must go through the federal oil ministry and prefers per-barrel service fees.

The agreement between Total and Kurdistan came with relations between the autonomous region and Baghdad at a low ebb over multiple festering disputes, including over oil contracts and territorial claims.

Within a period of weeks, US oil firm Chevron and Russia's Gazprom have also inked deals with Kurdistan, after American giant ExxonMobil signed an
agreement with the region last year.

"Total announced that it signed contracts in Kurdistan and, because of that, the ministry of oil told them that they had breached Iraqi law,"
Shahristani said. "If it ends its contract with Kurdistan, it can proceed with the Halfaya field."

Total is a minority member of a consortium led by China's CNPC and also including Malaysia's Petronas to extract oil from the Halfaya field in Maysan
province, in a contract awarded in a December 2009 auction.

The field, which has known reserves of 4.1 billion barrels of oil, officially began pumping last month. It is expected to produce 535,000 barrels
of oil per day within five years.

CNPC has the biggest stake in the consortium at 37.5 percent, followed by Petronas and Total at 18.75 percent each, with Iraq's state-owned South Oil
Company holding a 25-percent stake.

The latest deals between Chevron, Total and Gazprom and the Kurdish region came after Baghdad held a public auction in late May for a dozen energy
exploration blocks, but only four contracts were awarded, with analysts attributing the failure to the tough terms on offer.

In a nod to that criticism, Shahristani said Iraq was considering modifying the terms.

We are studying a new model of contract for other oil fields because the first oil fields (that were auctioned) were discovered and well-known," he
told reporters.

"There is a study in the ministry of oil to improve the model of contract to make it more attractive for oil companies.

"The fourth bid round was not successful, as we hoped, and the reason was because the contracts … were very tough and did not give a possibility for
the company to accept the high risk of work."

Iraq has proven reserves of 143.1 billion barrels of oil and 3.2 trillion cubic metres (111.9 trillion cubic feet) of gas, both of which are among the
highest such deposits in the world.

The country currently produces 3.2 million barrels per day of oil, with resulting exports accounting for the lion's share of government income.
Baghdad aims to increase both figures dramatically.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

OIL

NGOs take Norway to European Court over Arctic oil exploration

Two NGOs and six young climate activists have decided to take Norway to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) to demand the cancellation of oil permits in the Arctic, Greenpeace announced on Tuesday.

NGOs take Norway to European Court over Arctic oil exploration
Northern Norway. Photo by Vidar Nordli-Mathisen on Unsplash.

It’s the latest turn in a legal tussle between environmental organisations Greenpeace and Young Friends of the Earth Norway on one side and the Norwegian state on the other.

The organisations are demanding the government cancel 10 oil exploration licenses in the Barents Sea awarded in 2016, arguing it was unconstitutional.

Referring to the Paris Agreement, which seeks to limit global warming to less than two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, the organisations claim that the oil licenses violated article 112 of Norway’s constitution, guaranteeing everyone the right to a healthy environment.”

The six activists, alongside Greenpeace Nordic and Young Friends of the Earth Norway, hope that the European Court of Human Rights will hear their case and find that Norway’s oil expansion is in breach of human rights,” Greenpeace said in a statement.

In December, Norway’s Supreme Court rejected the claim brought by the organisations, their third successive legal defeat.

READ MORE: Norway sees oil in its future despite IEA’s warnings 

While most of the judges on the court agreed that article 112 could be invoked if the state failed to meet its climate and environmental obligations– they did not think it was applicable in this case.

The court also held that the granting of oil permits was not contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights, in part because they did not represent “a real and immediate risk” to life and physical integrity.

“The young activists and the environmental organisations argue that this judgment was flawed, as it discounted the significance of their environmental constitutional rights and did not take into account an accurate assessment of the consequences of climate change for the coming generations,” Greenpeace said.

On Friday, the Norwegian government unveiled a white paper on the country’s energy future, which still includes oil exploration despite a warning from the International Energy Agency (IEA).

The IEA recently warned that all future fossil fuel projects must be scrapped if the world is to reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.

The Norwegian case is an example of a global trend in which climate activists are increasingly turning to courts to pursue their agenda.

SHOW COMMENTS