SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

REFERENDUMS IN SWITZERLAND

What’s at stake in Switzerland’s federal referendums on September 22nd?

On September 22nd, Swiss citizens will head to the polls (unless they've already mailed in their ballots by post) in the third round of national votes in 2024.

What's at stake in Switzerland's federal referendums on September 22nd?
Swiss retirees don't want to receive lower pensions. Photo: Claudio Schwarz on Unsplash

Two issues will be submitted to a popular vote on September 22nd, 2024.

The first, and the less contentious of the two, is the vote “For the future of our nature and our landscape (Biodiversity Initiative).”

It calls, as its name suggests, for increased funding to preserve the country’s biodiversity and ecosystems.

If accepted, this proposal would enshrine in the constitution the obligation of cantons and the federal government to increase protection of nature, landscapes, as well as historic buildings and sites, by allocating more funding to this pursuit.

Pension reform

This vote, which seeks to decrease the second-pillar (LLP) pension is far more controversial — and there is a good reason for this.

But what exactly is the second-pillar (LPP) retirement fund?

Like the first one —the state AHV / AVS pension — the second pillar is also obligatory.

It is designed to enable pensioners to maintain their standard of living in retirement.

To benefit from the scheme, you must pay in monthly contributions throughout your working life, if:

  • You are at least 17 years old
  • You pay into the first pillar
  • You are in fixed employment and earn at least 22,050 francs a year

You and your employer each pay half of the required amount, which is based both on your salary and your age.

From 25 to 34 years old, the contribution is 7 percent of your salary; 35 to 44, 10 percent; 45 to 54 years old,15 percent; and 55 to retirement, 18 percent — each of these contributions spilt in half between you and your employer.

How much occupational pension you receive once you retire will depend on how much you (and your employer) contributed into the second pillar fund throughout your working years. It will also depend on your last salary. 

As a general indication, the amount of first and second pillar pension usually makes up 60 to 70 percent of your last salary. (People who want to get even more money, can invest into the third pillar, which not compulsory, but helpful.)

READ ALSO: What is Switzerland’s ‘second pillar’ pension and how you will benefit from it? 

Why is the pension reform vote stirring controversy?

The reform is calling for cutting the LPP from 6.8  to 6 percent, which means annuities would drop by about 3,240 francs a year on average.

The Federal Council, which supports this move, argues that this reform is meant to ensure that pension funds can sustain the impact of longer life expectancy among retirees.

However, for most pensioners, the second pillar is an important supplement to the retirement income and they don’t want to see it decreased.

But there is another reason as well.

In view of recent events, many people in Switzerland have doubts about the government’s pension calculations.

Just weeks ago, it was revealed that Switzerland’s Social Insurance Office had miscalculated projected spending for the old-age pension up to the year 2033: the annual expenditure is likely to be around 4 billion francs less than originally estimated.

Based on this news, many people in Switzerland now say there is likely enough money in the pension coffers, and the cut in LPP is therefore not needed.

READ ALSO:  What does Switzerland’s huge pension ‘fiasco’ mean and what happens next?

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

POLITICS

Trump vs Harris: Swiss MPs argue over who would be better for Switzerland

With American VP Kamala Harris expected to get the Democratic Party’s nomination for president, Swiss politicians are divided about how beneficial — or not — she would be for Switzerland.

Trump vs Harris: Swiss MPs argue over who would be better for Switzerland

While it is certain that Kamala Harris and Donald Trump could not care less about Switzerland’s opinions of their political agenda, this does not prevent Swiss politicians from supporting one candidate over another.

That is because the outcome of any presidential election in the United States has always had broad global repercussions—impacting Switzerland as well.

The 2024 election will be no different.

Not so neutral

Generally speaking and based on past experiences, Switzerland’s government has always found a common language (which, in this case, is English) with any US president.

As the Federal Council said in November 2020, when asked for a comment about Trump’s election, “we want what is best for Switzerland,” adding that “Switzerland can get along with” whoever happens to be in the White House at the time.

Nevertheless, Swiss MPs are not quite as diplomatic (or neutral) in expressing their views of the US presidential candidates, and especially about whose policies are likely to be better for Switzerland.

Not surprisingly, their preferences are determined by whether they are to the right or left of the political spectrum, with those on the right supporting Republican candidates — in this case, Trump — while more liberal MPs favouring Harris, a Democrat.

‘Regulation-mad socialist’

It follows then that the right-wing Swiss People’s Party (SVP) favours Trump.

In an interview with the 20 Minuten news platform, the party’s MP Franz Grüter called Harris a ‘regulation-mad socialist,” pointing out that “it was always easier for Switzerland when Republicans were in power in the USA.”

Another SVP deputy, Roland Rino Büchel, said that “Democratic presidents harass our country almost systematically when they are in power.”

While he did not explain his assertion, Swiss banks were a target of tax litigation from 2008 to 2013, brought about by the US Department of Justice  under President Barack Obama. As a result of this legal action, Switzerland had to largely abandon banking secrecy and several Swiss banks were hit with heavy fines.

‘A better choice’

However, a number of other MPs are in Harris’ corner.

“Harris is a better choice,” said deputy Hans Jörg Rüegsegger, breaking ranks with his SVP colleagues.

“Trump doesn’t care about Switzerland,” he added. “Whether it’s immigration or social issues, Harris is certainly closer to our values than Trump.”

Elisabeth Schneider-Schneiter, a deputy from the Centre party, also supports Harris.

“She stands for an open USA, which makes its contribution to a functioning multilateralism. This is of utmost importance for a small economy like Switzerland.”

Trump, on the other hand, would be harmful to the Swiss export economy, among other things.

Additional trade barriers – such as tariffs – which Trump would impose “would make the US market less attractive for our export industry,” she added.

SHOW COMMENTS