SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

WORKING IN SWEDEN

Make it easier for Swedish work permit holders to sue employers, new report argues

It should be easier for work permit holders to take dishonest employers to court, a new report by the Swedish Confederation for Professional Employees (TCO) argues.

Make it easier for Swedish work permit holders to sue employers, new report argues
Non-EU labour migrants' right to be in Sweden is closely tied to their contract, which leaves them vulnerable to dishonest employers. Photo: Isabell Höjman/TT

TCO, an umbrella organisation for trade unions representing white collar workers in Sweden, in its report outlines two proposals to improve job security for work permit holders and increase their chances of staying in the country.

The first proposal is that work permit holders whose employers don’t follow those labour or salary conditions that the work permit was based on should be able to sue them for compensation.

The second proposal argues that work permit holders who take their employer to court for not living up to the conditions promised in the work permit application should be able to stay in Sweden during the court process, even if their permit has expired.

“The risk for labour migrants of losing their work permit gives them a weak position vis-à-vis the employer, which reduces the incentives for labour migrants to report misconduct to the authorities or contact their trade union,” reads the report.

“Current regulations also lack sanctions aimed at employers who exploit the vulnerable position that labour migrants find themselves in, by for example not paying the salary or giving them the conditions promised in the work permit application.”

There have been several reports in recent years about dishonest employers not paying foreign employees the salary they’re owed or were offered in their work permit application – ranging from illegal practices to conditions that are not criminal, but do not equal good job security.

Work permit holders may be reluctant to stand up against these employers, because their right to remain in Sweden is so closely tied to their job, argues TCO’s report. But when it’s time to renew their work permit they may still be the ones to take the hit, and be told to leave the country after their permit extension is rejected because the conditions in their original application were not met.

TCO argues that making it possible for work permit holders to demand compensation from employers who don’t live up to what was promised in the permit application, would encourage victims of dishonest employers to speak up about unfair working conditions.

“In order for the protection of rights not to become a chimera, it has to be possible for a labour migrant to be able to stay in the country during an ongoing legal dispute,” the report reads.

A work permit holder who loses their job has three months to apply for a new job before their permit expires and they have to leave Sweden. Three months may in some cases be enough to settle a dispute, argues the report, but to allow for more drawn-out cases Sweden should either extend those three months or consider offering temporary residence permits to people in that situation.

“The details of a proposal to enable labour migrants to remain in the country to pursue a dispute with their employer should of course be subject to an inquiry,” the report adds.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

WORK PERMITS

Business leaders: Work permit threshold ‘has no place in Swedish labour model’

Sweden's main business group has attacked a proposal to exempt some jobs from a new minimum salary for work permits, saying it is "unacceptable" political interference in the labour model and risks seriously affecting national competitiveness.

Business leaders: Work permit threshold 'has no place in Swedish labour model'

The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise said in its response to the government’s consultation, submitted on Thursday afternoon, that it not only opposed the proposal to raise the minimum salary for a work permit to Sweden’s median salary (currently 34,200 kronor a month), but also opposed plans to exempt some professions from the higher threshold. 

“To place barriers in the way of talent recruitment by bringing in a highly political salary threshold in combination with labour market testing is going to worsen the conditions for Swedish enterprise in both the short and the long term, and risks leading to increased fraud and abuse,” the employer’s group said.   

The group, which represents businesses across most of Sweden’s industries, has been critical of the plans to further raise the salary threshold for work permits from the start, with the organisation’s deputy director general, Karin Johansson, telling The Local this week that more than half of those affected by the higher threshold would be skilled graduate recruits Swedish businesses sorely need.   

But the fact that it has not only rejected the higher salary threshold, but also the proposed system of exemptions, will nonetheless come as a blow to Sweden’s government, and particular the Moderate Party led by Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, which has long claimed to be the party of business. 

The confederation complained that the model proposed in the conclusions of the government inquiry published in February would give the government and political parties a powerful new role in setting salary conditions, undermining the country’s treasured system of collective bargaining. 

The proposal for the higher salary threshold, was, the confederation argued, “wrong in principle” and did “not belong in the Swedish labour market”. 

“That the state should decide on the minimum salary for certain foreign employees is an unacceptable interference in the Swedish collective bargaining model, where the parties [unions and employers] weigh up various needs and interested in negotiations,” it wrote. 

In addition, the confederation argued that the proposed system where the Sweden Public Employment Service and the Migration Agency draw up a list of exempted jobs, which would then be vetted by the government, signified the return of the old system of labour market testing which was abolished in 2008.

“The government agency-based labour market testing was scrapped because of it ineffectiveness, and because it was unreasonable that government agencies were given influence over company recruitment,” the confederation wrote. 

“The system meant long handling times, arbitrariness, uncertainty for employers and employees, as well as an indirect union veto,” it added. “Nothing suggests it will work better this time.” 

For a start, it said, the Public Employment Service’s list of professions was inexact and outdated, with only 179 professions listed, compared to 430 monitored by Statistics Sweden. This was particularly the case for new skilled roles within industries like battery manufacturing. 

“New professions or smaller professions are not caught up by the classification system, which among other things is going to make it harder to recruit in sectors which are important for the green industrial transition,” the confederation warned. 

Rather than implement the proposals outlined in the inquiry’s conclusions, it concluded, the government should instead begin work on a new national strategy for international recruitment. 

“Sweden instead needs a national strategy aimed at creating better conditions for Swedish businesses to be able to attract, recruit and retain international competence.”

SHOW COMMENTS