SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

IMMIGRATION

Danish politicians unwilling to come to rescue of refugee centre residents

After a film highlighted the plight of the rejected asylum seekers trapped at Denmark’s controversial ‘departure centre’, MEPs have said it would be wrong to process stranded cases in Denmark.

Danish politicians unwilling to come to rescue of refugee centre residents
The gates of the controversial Kærshovedgård deportation centre on Jutland. Photo: Bo Amstrup/Ritzau Scanpix

On the back of the release of The Painter’s Room, a 23-minute documentary shot at the Kærshovedgård ‘expulsion centre’ in central Jutland, Denmark’s public broadcaster DR wrote about the situation faced by Ketily, a 34-year-old from Eritrea, who has been stranded at Kærshovedgård and other centres for a year and a half. 

The Danish Refugee Council and the Red-Green Alliance party have both called for the cases of people like Ketily to be heard in Denmark, offering them a way out of their long limbo. 

According to the EU’s Dublin Regulation, asylum seekers should have their case processed in the first EU country in which they were registered.

As a result between 70 and 100 refugees like Ketily are currently stranded, as Italy, the first country in which they arrived has since December refused to take back asylum seekers who were registered first in Italy but are currently resident in other EU countries. 

READ ALSO: 

Social Democrats and Danish People’s Party opposed 

Anders Vistisen, and MEP for the anti-immigration Danish People’s Party, told DR that to process the cases of these asylum seekers in Denmark would be rewarding them for breaking the rules. 

“I certainly do not believe that you should give them positive preferential treatment because they have dragged their cases out by staying in Denmark,” he said. “Then they will be getting better treatment than everyone else who has followed the rules and had their case dealt with where they first entered the EU.”

People like Ketily, he explained, were gulity of so-called ‘asylum shopping’, travelling through five or six safe countries in the hope of getting asylum in the one where they could expect the best quality of life. 

“You shouldn’t reward that, because then you create a precedent for everyone else to do the same.” 

Christel Schaldemose, an MEP from the Social Democrats, said asylum seekers should have their cases handled as rapidly as possible in the countries where they arrive. 

“We cannot allow migrants to come to Europe and live without legal residency. If there’s no grounds for protection or residency, the EU member countries need to get better at sending people back to their homelands.” 

Vistesen said his party wanted Denmark to withdraw from the Dublin regulation, pointing out that in 2022 it had taken in 541 asylum seekers under the rules and only returned 472 to other countries.  

“It does not work and it has no effect. We receive more than we can send out. It is crazy to highlight it as part of the strict immigration policy when it has collapsed,” he said. 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

IMMIGRATION

Local authority demands changes at Denmark’s Kærshovedgård asylum camp

Elected officials in the local Ikast-Brande Municipality have demanded the government act following a recent damning report on conditions at the Kærshovedgård ‘departure centre’.

Local authority demands changes at Denmark’s Kærshovedgård asylum camp

Local politicians in Ikast-Brande have reportedly run out of patience with crime and security issues at the Kærshovedgård ‘departure centre’ for rejected asylum seekers and convicted felons awaiting deportation.

The officials have stated their position in a letter sent by the Ikast-Brande municipal council to Mininster for Immigration and Integration Kaare Dybvad Bek, newswire Ritzau reports.

That comes after conditions at the centre were the focus of a stinging rebuke in a report by the Ombudsman, the Danish parliamentary watchdog, in a report published last week.

READ ALSO: Danish watchdog slams ‘deteriorating’ conditions at Kærshovedgård asylum facility

In the report, the ombudsman said conditions at the centre have deteriorated and are now so poor that they prevent residents from “living basic life”, while security at the facility was also criticised.

“We cannot passively look on as criminal residents who have been sentenced to deportation and who live at Kærshovedgård Departure Centre repeatedly commit new crimes and create insecurity in the local community,” the officials write in the letter.

Incidents named in the letter including drugs cases and a recent fatal traffic accident for which a resident of Kærshovedgård is the subject of police charges.

“We need a solution now,” the council writes without providing any specific suggestions as to which measures could be taken.

While state funds have been provided for the purposes of improving safety in the community neighbouring the facility, this does not go far enough according to the authors of the letter.

“The crime which is committed by some of the residents of the departure centre is not reduced by this funding. It is the residents, their behaviour and their movements which should be in focus,” they say.

READ ALSO: New film reveals life at Denmark’s controversial deportation centre

Located 13 kilometres from Ikast in Jutland, the Kærshovedgård facility is one of two deportation centres in Denmark used to house rejected male and female asylum seekers who have not agreed to voluntary return, as well as persons with so-called ‘tolerated stay’ (tålt ophold) status. Some residents are foreign nationals with criminal records who have served their sentences but are awaiting deportation.

The residents do not have permission to reside in Denmark but many cannot be forcibly deported because Denmark has no diplomatic relations or return agreements with their home countries.

Kærshovedgård first became prominent in the mid-2010s, when it received criticism for imposing conditions that could lead to mental illnesses in residents.

“The security situation for the residents of Kærshovedgård appears to have worsened since the ombudsman’s last visit, and this is a development that should be rectified,” the ombudsman, Niels Fenger, said in a statement on Friday.

Fenger said he was “of the impression that residents experience greater feelings of insecurity at the departure centre [and there is] a lot of crime including the sale of narcotics.”

“Additionally, the atmosphere at the departure centre carries a sense of deterioration and a significant number of residents have addiction problems,” the ombudsman statement said.

The ombudsman also observed that, since a previous visit in 2017, “there has been a change in the composition of residents in that people who have a deportation [criminal, ed.] sentence and who did not previously live at Kærshovedgård now make up the largest group at the location”.

SHOW COMMENTS