SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

NATO

How will joining Nato change the daily lives of people in Sweden?

Sweden joined Nato on March 7th, but will the average person living in the country notice any difference?

How will joining Nato change the daily lives of people in Sweden?
Joining Nato is a big step for Sweden in terms of geopolitics, but will we actually notice any changes in our daily lives? Photo: Jonas Ekströmer/TT

In an interview with TT newswire, Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said that he hopes normal Swedes notice Sweden’s membership of Nato “as little as possible”.

That will most likely be the case, but there are a few small changes we might start to notice.

Greater presence of foreign military – especially US soldiers

There will be more foreign units training in Sweden and more foreign ships and aircraft in Swedish territory.

There will also be more US soldiers and marines at 17 Swedish bases due to an extended defence agreement signed between the two countries late last year – although admittedly, this is only indirectly linked to Sweden’s Nato membership

Visible Nato flags

Nato flags may be raised at some of the Armed Forces’ sites. The Liberals have also been calling for a Nato flag to be raised in parliament. Maybe we’ll start to hear the Nato hymn in Sweden?

More investment in infrastructure

There could be more investments in Swedish infrastructure. Article 3 of the Nato treaty commits countries to “strengthening the resilience of society,” including measures like securing energy supply, upgrading roads and railways and making sure there are emergency beds available in hospitals.

Kristersson has not ruled out that major investments may be necessarily, which means that new jobs and new building works may pop up across the country as these upgrades are carried out.

Conscription may change

Sweden’s conscripts are likely to be involved in Nato exercises in Sweden, although it has not yet been decided whether fully trained conscripts will be eligible for active duty abroad.

A change to Sweden’s image of itself

Joining Nato means a formal end to centuries of Swedish non-alignment, despite the fact that the country had already begun to integrate its defence policy with Nato before formally joining. Will that change how Swedes consider themselves and their country in the future?

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

MILITARY

EXPLAINED: What you need to know about Sweden’s new military spending report

Sweden's parliamentary defence commission on Friday recommended adding 52.8 billion kronor to the national defence budget by 2030, taking defence spending to 2.6 percent of GDP.

EXPLAINED: What you need to know about Sweden's new military spending report

What is the Swedish Defence Commision? 

The Swedish Defence Commission is a cross-party forum which seeks to ensure broad political agreement around Sweden’s defence requirements. It brings together representatives of all eight parties in the Swedish parliament, with two each from the Moderates, Sweden Democrats and Social Democrats and one each for the other parties.

There are also advisers and experts from the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry for Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Defence, the Ministry of Finance, the Prime Minister’s Office, the Swedish Armed Forces, the Swedish Defence Materiel Administration and the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency. Members of the committee are supported by a secretariat comprising one principal secretary and five secretaries.

What is the report they have delivered? 

The committee on Friday delivered its final, report, “Strengthened defence capability, Sweden as an Ally“, meeting the deadline given by the country’s defence minister Pål Jonson when he ordered the committee to develop proposals for a new defence bill in December 2022, with a total of four reports, the first three of which were delivered in April 2023, June 2023, December 2023. 

What have they recommended? 

The committee have recommended that Sweden’s budget is increased from 119 billion kronor a year in 2024 to 185 billion kronor in 2030, which would bring total spending to 2.6 percent of Sweden’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). 

The committee said it agreed with the recommendations given by Micael Byden, Supreme Commander of the Swedish Armed Forces in November 2023, which were that Sweden should increase or improve: 

  • air defence and in particular its cooperation within NATO’s Integrated Air and Missile Defence (IAMD)
  • its ability to combat air, land and sea drones 
  • its integration with NATO’s command system
  • its logistics, so that it can provide Host Nation Support and serve as a base for other units from other Nato countries. 
  • its capacity to operate with military units outside Sweden’s borders 

But the committee also made additional recommendations beyong those given by the armed forces, calling for: 

  • two new army brigades, so that Sweden would have three mechanised brigades and one infantry brigade by 2030
  • a new Norrland Infantry Regiment,
  • an increase in the number of conscripts trained a year from the current level of 8,000 to 10,000 in 2030 and 12,000 in 2032, and possibly to 14,000 in 2035
  • a boost in Sweden’s air defence capability, particularly to counter drone attacks 
  • stocking up on additional ammunition, including air-to-air and cruise missiles, and spare parts 
  • 20 new companies and platoons dedicated to defending Sweden’s territories 
  • increased refresher courses for conscripts, extra funding of voluntary defence organisations, and expansion of the officer education programme

How will the cost of funding this military expansion be met? 

While they were agreed on what needed to be done, party representatives on the committee did not agree on how much needed to be spent or how ti should be financed. 

The Centre Party representative said that spending should be higher, comprising 3 percent of GDP. 

The representatives from the Social Democrats, Left Party, and Green Party, added a statement to the report when they called for a section on how the extra spending should be financed.  

Peter Hultqvist, who served as defence minister under the former Social Democrat government, called for a new beredskapsskatt, or “Readiness Tax” to fund the increase, saying it was disappointing that the committee had not been able to agree on financing. 

“This demand is so big that it risks pushing other pressing requirements out of government spending plans,” he said. “There is a risk that healthcare, education and elderly care will be hit.” 

But Ulf Kristersson, Sweden’s prime minister, rejected the idea of a new tax. 

“It’s no secret that the parties on the left always see reasons to raise taxes, and that’s the case this time as well, I assume. But that is not our way forward,” he said. “We must be able to prioritise Swedish defense, and I understand that there is now complete agreement that it is an important political task.” 

Anna Starbrink, a defence spokesperson for the Liberals, the smallest party in the government, said that the Swedish Defence Commission had not in the past been tasked with developing funding proposals. 

“This is a new idea from the opposition and from the Social Democrats’ side is about nothing more than forcing through a new tax hike through the defence commission, and that’s something the rest of us don’t want to go along with,” she said. 

SHOW COMMENTS