SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

POLITICS IN SWEDEN

What comes next in the Swedish Christian Democrats’ internal soap opera?

With its unexpected twists, charged emotions, and power-dressing protagonists, the dispute at the top of Sweden's Christian Democrats has been likened to the 80s TV drama Dynasty. What on earth is going on?

What comes next in the Swedish Christian Democrats' internal soap opera?
Sara Skyttedal (left) and Ebba Busch (right) when Skyttedal was presented as the party's top EU candidate in October 2023. Photo: Christine Olsson/TT

On the face of it, the party’s leader, Ebba Busch, and its top MEP, Sara Skyttedal, have much in common: both are skilled political communicators, both have helped drive the party to the populist right, and both are among Sweden’s best-dressed politicians.

But the two are now in the final throes of a battle to the political death.

Skyttedal already looks to have received the fatal blow. The question is whether she will be able to take Busch with her.

“I was confronted with something which only exists in the imagination of Ebba Busch,” Sara Skyttedal claimed in a TV interview last week, a few days after she was abruptly replaced as the party’s top EU candidate on the grounds that she had betrayed her party by opening talks with the rival Sweden Democrats.

In the interview, she painted an unflattering picture of the internal dynamics in the Christian Democrats, particularly the machinations that led to her dismissal, but she also said that the party had not been honest over the controversy of her predecessor in the EU parliament and his views on abortion. 

“Flexibility with the truth seems to be the common thread running through all this,” Skyttedal said. 

Busch and others in the party probably breathed a sigh of relief that she had nothing more damaging to air. 

The saga goes back to the start of last year, when Skyttedal — a former leader of the Christian Democrats’ youth wing — horrified party traditionalists by arguing for the legalisation of medical cannabis in an article in the Dagens Nyheter newspaper, even going so far as to admit that she herself had used it (with the caveat that this was in countries where usage is legal).

When Johan Ingerö — the party secretary who was arguably the architect of the party’s shift to the populist right — gave her a dressing down and pressured her to publicly retract what she’d said, she responded by reporting him to the police for sexually harassing her at a post-election party nine years previously.  

Busch removed Ingerö in March, justifying the move with the claim that he had not been successful as party secretary anyway.

The punishment for Skyttedal didn’t come until two months later, when the party’s nomination committee dropped her as the lead candidate in the European elections, replacing her with David Lega, who represents the party’s more conservative religious wing. Another candidate, Ella Kardemark, was put in second place. 

Skyttedal, Busch and Kardemark in October 2023. Photo: Christine Olsson/TT

Skyttedal is not someone who can be so easily discounted, however. She immediately began canvassing within the party, winning the backing of its youth wing and other powerful figures. 

At the party’s annual congress last November, she then made a dramatic arrival, preceding to win back the top spot by securing a majority on the party committee. 

At this point, it looked like Skyttedal had come out victorious.

But on January 20th, Busch called a press conference at which she announced a new twist that took even the most avid party-watchers by surprise. Skyttedal would be removed and replaced, not by Lega, but by someone who had only joined the party the day before: the right-wing journalist Alice Teodorescu Måwe.

In her favour, Teodorescu Måwe has a strong public profile which has only grown over recent months since she began jointly fronting a new politics show on Swedish national TV, alongside the left-wing Social Democrat Daniel Suhonen. 

Sara Skyttedal, David Lega and Ebba Busch celebrating after the EU elections in 2019. Photo: Henrik Montgomery/TT

On the other hand, she is so close to the Moderate Party that she even helped develop their ideas programme and, after her candidacy for the Christian Democrats was announced, admitted in an interview with TV4 that she didn’t even believe in God.

At a press conference announcing her replacement, Busch said that Skyttedal had betrayed the Christian Democrats by approaching the Sweden Democrats, claiming that she had gone as far as to ask if she could switch parties and instead be placed at, or near, the top of the Sweden Democrats’ party list in the European elections.

Busch said she’d been alerted to Skyttedal’s machinations by none other than the Sweden Democrats’ party leader, Jimmie Åkesson.

But this information came to light in the autumn, before Skyttedal had even won the backing of the party’s ruling committee, meaning Skyttedal can probably justly claim that this was largely just a pretext for removing her once a suitable candidate had been found.  

In her interview, she admitted to contacting the Sweden Democrats, but claimed she had simply floated the idea of helping them out as a consultant. “I absolutely did not demand anything like that,” she said of the claim she had wanted to top their party list. “I didn’t get any offer of that either.”

Alice Teodorescu Måwe and Ebba Busch entering parliament in January 2024. Photo: Christine Olsson/TT

“My view is that I have been crystal clear with how these contacts have looked long before it became a problem. In my view, Ebba Busch has not been honest with me about her intentions,” Skyttedal said. 

So what will the next twist in this drama bring? 

Whatever happens, the image of the Christian Democrats is badly tarnished.

Under Busch’s predecessor, the gentle Göran Hägglund, the Christian Democrats were the party of traditional family values and generous international aid. Since Busch took over, they’ve started to resemble the Christian right in the US, a change that has already divided the party’s rank and file. 

Internally, the party is also unhappy that a complete newcomer has been appointed to a plum position over politicians who have dedicated their lives to the party.  

“I’m not going to campaign to send a Moderate party opinion-maker to Brussels.” Magnus Kolsjö, a Christian Democrat who has himself formerly campaigned to be an MEP, wrote on Facebook, calling the move “totally brain dead”.

It may be that Busch is calculating that Teodorescu Måwe can win over just enough former Moderate voters to secure the party’s two MEPs in the European election in June. But the decision is arguably more likely to just stop loyal supporters bothering to vote. 

If that happens, and the party loses one of more of its two MEPs, Busch is likely to get the blame. It could even trigger a change of leader.

It may be, however, that Skyttedal manages to land another damaging blow before that.  

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

POLITICS

‘Very little debate’ on consequences of Sweden’s crime and migration clampdown

Sweden’s political leaders are putting the population’s well-being at risk by moving the country in a more authoritarian direction, according to a recent report.

'Very little debate' on consequences of Sweden's crime and migration clampdown

The Liberties Rule of Law report shows Sweden backsliding across more areas than any other of the 19 European Union member states monitored, fuelling concerns that the country risks breaching its international human rights obligations, the report says.

“We’ve seen this regression in other countries for a number of years, such as Poland and Hungary, but now we see it also in countries like Sweden,” says John Stauffer, legal director of the human rights organisation Civil Rights Defenders, which co-authored the Swedish section of the report.

The report, compiled by independent civil liberties groups, examines six common challenges facing European Union member states.

Sweden is shown to be regressing in five of these areas: the justice system, media environment, checks and balances, enabling framework for civil society and systemic human rights issues.

The only area where Sweden has not regressed since 2022 is in its anti-corruption framework, where there has been no movement in either a positive or negative direction.

Source: Liberties Rule of Law report

As politicians scramble to combat an escalation in gang crime, laws are being rushed through with too little consideration for basic rights, according to Civil Rights Defenders.

Stauffer cites Sweden’s new stop-and-search zones as a case in point. From April 25th, police in Sweden can temporarily declare any area a “security zone” if there is deemed to be a risk of shootings or explosive attacks stemming from gang conflicts.

Once an area has received this designation, police will be able to search people and cars in the area without any concrete suspicion.

“This is definitely a piece of legislation where we see that it’s problematic from a human rights perspective,” says Stauffer, adding that it “will result in ethnic profiling and discrimination”.

Civil Rights Defenders sought to prevent the new law and will try to challenge it in the courts once it comes into force, Stauffer tells The Local in an interview for the Sweden in Focus Extra podcast

He also notes that victims of racial discrimination at the hands of the Swedish authorities had very little chance of getting a fair hearing as actions by the police or judiciary are “not even covered by the Discrimination Act”.

READ ALSO: ‘Civil rights groups in Sweden can fight this government’s repressive proposals’

Stauffer also expresses concerns that an ongoing migration clampdown risks splitting Sweden into a sort of A and B team, where “the government limits access to rights based on your legal basis for being in the country”.

The report says the government’s migration policies take a “divisive ‘us vs them’ approach, which threatens to increase rather than reduce existing social inequalities and exclude certain groups from becoming part of society”.

Proposals such as the introduction of a requirement for civil servants to report undocumented migrants to the authorities would increase societal mistrust and ultimately weaken the rule of law in Sweden, the report says.

The lack of opposition to the kind of surveillance measures that might previously have sparked an outcry is a major concern, says Stauffer.

Politicians’ consistent depiction of Sweden as a country in crisis “affects the public and creates support for these harsh measures”, says Stauffer. “And there is very little talk and debate about the negative consequences.”

Hear John Stauffer from Civil Rights Defender discuss the Liberties Rule of Law report in the The Local’s Sweden in Focus Extra podcast for Membership+ subscribers.

SHOW COMMENTS