SHARE
COPY LINK

POLITICS

Sweden Democrat leader calls for mosques to be demolished

Jimmie Åkesson, the leader of the far-right Sweden Democrats, on Saturday called for a moratorium on the building of new mosques in Sweden and for existing mosques to be demolished if they spread "antidemocratic, anti-Swedish, homophobic or antisemitic propaganda".

Sweden Democrat leader calls for mosques to be demolished
Sweden Democrat leader Jimmie Åkesson employed harsh rhetoric against "Islamists" in his speech on Saturday. Photo: Jessica Gow/TT

The call was part of a sustained attack on “Islamists” made in his speech to the party’s ‘Landsdagarna’ congress in Västerås, in which he accused the Social Democrats and their leader, Magdalena Andersson, of being “an active part of the Islamist movement in Sweden” and reliant on Islamist votes. 

“We need an immediate total stop on the establishment of new mosques in Sweden,” Åkesson said. “In the longer term we need to start confiscating and demolishing mosque buildings where there is a spread of antidemocratic, anti-Swedish, homophobic or antisemitic propaganda”.

Åkesson’s call was immediately rejected by Sweden’s Prime Minister, Ulf Kristersson, who is dependent on Sweden Democrat support for his position.

“In Sweden, we do not demolish places of religious worship,” he told the TT newswire. “Those who express antisemitic semtiments or agitate against Muslims are offending people in our own country and harming Sweden and Swedish interests internationally.”

Magnus Ranstorp, Sweden’s most high-profile antiterrorism expert, told the Dagens Nyheter newspaper that Åkesson’s statement was a threat to Sweden’s national security.

“This can contribute to worsening the security threat against Sweden and strengthens Sweden’s image as anti-Islamic. We also haven’t yet joined Nato yet and Erdogan may well take this up.”

Opposition political parties, meanwhile, called for the government to eject Sweden Democrat appointed government officials from the government offices. 

“This is something Ulf Kristersson, [Christian Democrat leader] Ebba Busch, and [Liberal Party leader] Johan Pehrson need to take a stand against, both verbally but also in action,” said Social Democrat leader Magadalena Andersson. “One way might be to eject Sweden Democrat officials from the Rosenbad [government building].” 

Muharrem Demirok, leader of the Centre Party, said that Åkesson’s statement, “must have consequences”. 

“If there are no consequences in its cooperation with the Sweden Democrats, the government will look like it is turning a blind eye to this type of serious attack and racism,” he said. “They have to ask themselves the question, ‘if this doesn’t mark the limit, then it’s hard to see where the limit is for what you are willing to accept.”   

Åkesson’s call for demolishing mosques followed a long attack on “Islamists” and the support he claimed they were given by the Social Democrats. 

“The Islamists are not longer a handful of crazies spread out in a few deprived areas around our big cities,” he said. “There are here in big numbers. They are everywhere. And they have strong mutual loyalty with the Social Democrats and the Left in general.” 

“The Islamists in Hamas and other antisemitic, Islamist and antidemocratic movements are openly supported by representatives of Sweden’s biggest party, the Social Democrats,” he added. 

Rather than combatting Islamists, he continued, the Social Democrats were “an active part of the Islamist movement in Sweden”.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

POLITICS

‘Very little debate’ on consequences of Sweden’s crime and migration clampdown

Sweden’s political leaders are putting the population’s well-being at risk by moving the country in a more authoritarian direction, according to a recent report.

'Very little debate' on consequences of Sweden's crime and migration clampdown

The Liberties Rule of Law report shows Sweden backsliding across more areas than any other of the 19 European Union member states monitored, fuelling concerns that the country risks breaching its international human rights obligations, the report says.

“We’ve seen this regression in other countries for a number of years, such as Poland and Hungary, but now we see it also in countries like Sweden,” says John Stauffer, legal director of the human rights organisation Civil Rights Defenders, which co-authored the Swedish section of the report.

The report, compiled by independent civil liberties groups, examines six common challenges facing European Union member states.

Sweden is shown to be regressing in five of these areas: the justice system, media environment, checks and balances, enabling framework for civil society and systemic human rights issues.

The only area where Sweden has not regressed since 2022 is in its anti-corruption framework, where there has been no movement in either a positive or negative direction.

Source: Liberties Rule of Law report

As politicians scramble to combat an escalation in gang crime, laws are being rushed through with too little consideration for basic rights, according to Civil Rights Defenders.

Stauffer cites Sweden’s new stop-and-search zones as a case in point. From April 25th, police in Sweden can temporarily declare any area a “security zone” if there is deemed to be a risk of shootings or explosive attacks stemming from gang conflicts.

Once an area has received this designation, police will be able to search people and cars in the area without any concrete suspicion.

“This is definitely a piece of legislation where we see that it’s problematic from a human rights perspective,” says Stauffer, adding that it “will result in ethnic profiling and discrimination”.

Civil Rights Defenders sought to prevent the new law and will try to challenge it in the courts once it comes into force, Stauffer tells The Local in an interview for the Sweden in Focus Extra podcast

He also notes that victims of racial discrimination at the hands of the Swedish authorities had very little chance of getting a fair hearing as actions by the police or judiciary are “not even covered by the Discrimination Act”.

READ ALSO: ‘Civil rights groups in Sweden can fight this government’s repressive proposals’

Stauffer also expresses concerns that an ongoing migration clampdown risks splitting Sweden into a sort of A and B team, where “the government limits access to rights based on your legal basis for being in the country”.

The report says the government’s migration policies take a “divisive ‘us vs them’ approach, which threatens to increase rather than reduce existing social inequalities and exclude certain groups from becoming part of society”.

Proposals such as the introduction of a requirement for civil servants to report undocumented migrants to the authorities would increase societal mistrust and ultimately weaken the rule of law in Sweden, the report says.

The lack of opposition to the kind of surveillance measures that might previously have sparked an outcry is a major concern, says Stauffer.

Politicians’ consistent depiction of Sweden as a country in crisis “affects the public and creates support for these harsh measures”, says Stauffer. “And there is very little talk and debate about the negative consequences.”

Hear John Stauffer from Civil Rights Defender discuss the Liberties Rule of Law report in the The Local’s Sweden in Focus Extra podcast for Membership+ subscribers.

SHOW COMMENTS