SHARE
COPY LINK

ART

Germany ‘failing in moral responsibility’ for restitution of Nazi-looted art

Germany must do more to return Nazi-looted art to its rightful owners, according to the recommendations of an independent advisory commission.

Colourful Life by Wassily Kandinsky
Colourful Life by Wassily Kandinsky. The advisory commission on looted art believes the work, currently on display at the Bayerische Landesbank in Lenbachhaus, should be returned to the descendents of its previous Jewish owner. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Peter Kneffel

A restitution law should be put in place to grant more rights and possibilities to the descendants of victims of the Nazis, said the Advisory Commission on the return of cultural property seized as a result of Nazi persecution, especially Jewish property.

Twenty years on from its establishment, the commission has so far issued just 23 recommendations. 

“The low number of recommendations from the commission is due to the low number of cases brought before it,” the commission said in a statement on Monday. 

The current legal situation makes restitution very difficult, the commission said.

“Until today, victims and their descendants can only bring a case before the commission if cultural institutions in possession of the art agree to it.”

A large number of Nazi-looted artworks have yet to be returned.

“The Lost Art Database alone, which publishes international searches and findings of Nazi-looted art, lists around 40,000 searches and another 35,000 findings of confiscated cultural property,” the commission stated.

READ ALSO: How Nazi-looted art is finding its way back to its owners

The commission, initially named after its first chairman, former president of the Federal Constitutional Court Hans-Jürgen Papier, was established in 2003 by the federal government, states, and municipal associations to mediate in particularly complex cases of Nazi-looted art. It was created to resolve differences between the parties involved in the return of cultural property confiscated due to Nazi persecution.

The commission stressed that Germany need to do more to return artworks stolen by the Nazis to their rightful owners.

“Criticism both in Germany and abroad continues, claiming that the Federal Republic of Germany is not sufficiently capable and not truly willing to adequately and comprehensively redress the Nazi injustice concerning cultural property.”

As part of the proposed reform, the commission suggests that descendants of Nazi victims should have the opportunity to unilaterally initiate proceedings before the commission. The commission’s role should also be strengthened, enabling it to do more than just make recommendations.

A restitution law would also ensure that private institutions or individuals possessing Nazi-looted art would be required to participate in the restitution process. A new law would also help regulate compensation claims, the commission said. 

The Federal Republic of Germany has acknowledged its international and national responsibility as the legal successor to the Third Reich, particularly in relation to addressing Nazi injustice and returning culturally significant property that was lost due to persecution.

But, said the commission: “It fails to live up to this political and moral responsibility because the existing regulations, especially in disputed cases, are inadequate.”

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

ART

Jewish council calls for new German restitution law on Nazi-looted art

The Central Council of Jews in Germany has urged lawmakers to significantly strengthen the mandate given to the country’s advisory commission on Nazi-looted art.

Jewish council calls for new German restitution law on Nazi-looted art

Speaking at an event marking the commission’s 20th anniversary, Central Council President Josef Schuster said: “The fact that the commission has only mediated in 23 cases since its founding is not a very good record,” given that an estimated 600,000 artworks were stolen during the Nazi era.

“It’s about dignity, it’s about identity, it’s about the core of our culture of remembrance.”

Schuster added that Germany had already made significant strides in addressing Nazi injustices, but “a just restitution law would be the next important step.”

He also pointed out that Nazi art theft had affected not only the Jewish elite but also the Jewish middle class whose stolen works might have had little art historical value but held great significance for families’ identities.

He noted that destroying this identity was the first step in the Nazis’ policy against Jews.

READ ALSO: Germany ‘failing in moral responsibility’ for restitution of Nazi-looted art

Hans-Jürgen Papier, the commission’s chairman and former president of the Federal Constitutional Court, urged “a clear commitment from policymakers in the form of legally binding guidelines for addressing unrestituted looted art cases.”

Papier stressed that essential demands, such as binding decision-making and restitution procedures for privately held cultural assets, could only be achieved through legislation. The commission had already called for additional powers and a legal basis for its work in a memorandum issued in early September.

Culture Minister Claudia Roth noted that discussions were ongoing.

“We want to significantly strengthen the Advisory Commission,” she said, agreeing that not enough Nazi-looted art had been returned and pledging concrete proposals to strengthen the commission.

The independent Advisory Commission was established in 2003 by the federal government, states, and municipal associations to mediate in cases involving the return of cultural assets seized due to Nazi persecution, especially from Jewish owners.

SHOW COMMENTS