SHARE
COPY LINK

HIGHER EDUCATION

Academics in uproar after Sweden cancels research funding

Sweden's government has cancelled all further funding for development research at just one week's notice, angering researchers who are seeing months spent writing applications go to waste.

Academics in uproar after Sweden cancels research funding
Katarina Bjelke, Director General of the Swedish Research Council, said that funding in the development field had helped contribute to overcoming challenges in sustainable development. Photo: Swedish Research Council

At a meeting on June 22nd, the government decided that the Swedish Research Council, the government body which is Sweden’s largest funder of research, should from June 30th fund no more grants in the area of development research.

In a press release, the council said that the decision, which came in the form of a regulatory letter, would apply with immediate effect, meaning any applications currently being assessed would not be given funding.

It will not apply retroactively, however, so all researchers already granted funding will be able continue their research until the end of the grant period.

Katarina Bjelke, director-general of the Swedish Research Council, said that the research funded by the council since it began giving grants in the development field ten years ago had “contributed to handling challenges linked to the global sustainability goals”.

The aim, she added, had been to “strengthen Swedish research of the highest quality with particular relevance to poverty alleviation and sustainable development in low-income countries”. 

Ashok Swain, head of the Peace and Conflict department at Uppsala University, told The Local the decision had taken him and his colleagues by surprise, and would mean a couple of projects at his department would go unfunded. 

“When I was told by somebody a couple of months back that this was a possibility, I laughed at it because I didn’t think anyone would ever do this because hundreds of people, hundreds of researchers have applied for the funding, and writing a research grant application is a huge, huge time-taker,” he said.

“I thought this would not be done in a country like Sweden.” 

Sebastian van Baalen, an assistant professor at Swain’s department, told The Local that he had spent three to four weeks preparing a proposal alongside a colleague based in The Netherlands, time which would now go to waste.

Swain said that the Swedish government’s funding of development research, which was up until 2013 managed from within the government aid organisation Sida, had long made a small but significant contribution to the country’s ability to punch above its weight when it comes to international development. 

“Sweden is a small economy with 10 million people. But it has always kept a much larger image internationally because of things like this,” he said.

“But this uniqueness of Sweden —  this kind of research, these kinds of ideas, this kind of foreign and security policy — is gradually going away. These kind of unique, special Swedish characteristics are going away.” 

He said that he did not expect the development funding to be reinstated next year, or even after the next election if there is a change in government. 

“Once these decisions are taken, it doesn’t really come back, even if there’s a change in government,” he said. “I don’t see it changing next year and I will be pleasantly surprised — even if there is a change of government — if things go back to be honest.”

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

HIGHER EDUCATION

What to do if you’re accused of cheating at university in Sweden

A student at Uppsala University was caught cheating with the help of ChatGPT this week. We look at what the rules are for students, if they are accused of cheating in Sweden.

What to do if you're accused of cheating at university in Sweden

The system is slightly different depending on whether you got caught cheating in an examination or in an essay, thesis or dissertation, and also whether you are accused of plagiarism, prohibited collaboration, or the use of prohibited aids. 

We looked at the procedure at Uppsala University, where the rules on cheating were last updated in 2014, so long before Chat GPT began to add whole new possibilities to cheating, and also the procedure at Stockholm University

It’s hard to know, for instance, if the use of Chat GPT should count as plagiarism (as its answers may well be unique), prohibited collaboration (as there is no actual person to collaborate with), or the use of prohibited aids.

Uppsala University, as it happens, has classified this week’s case as “use of prohibited aids”. 

If you are caught cheating in an exam 

If an examination invigilator suspects you of using prohibited aids during an exam, they must immediately tell the student that they are under suspicion. If the student has notes with them, or a device for contacting people outside the examination hall, these can be confiscated. 

The student can then, if they wish, finish the exam. 

Once the exam is over, the invigilator must contact the teacher responsible for the student, and then write a report detailing their suspicions. 

If you are caught plagiarising in an essay, thesis or dissertation

This is a lot more complex. 

Uppsala University distinguishes between two types of plagiarism, forbidden plagiarism, which is a legal matter, and plagiarism that is the result of carelessness or a misunderstanding, which it sees as an educational matter. 

A lecturer who suspects a work has been plagiarised, must together with the course examiner try to understand if the student has consciously tried to deceive the teacher, or has simply been guilty of bad academic writing that sticks too closely to its sources. 

What happens after the suspected cheating has been reported? 

Conference

The first thing that happens is that a conference is held between the student, their supervisors or lecturers, and the members of staff who have made the accusation. 

At the conference, the student is allowed to give as good an explanation of what happened as they can, and to present their view of what happened. The student is also informed of what the process is that might now be started. At this stage, the accusations and the student’s claims should be kept confidential. 

There may need to be further investigation to confirm or disprove any claims made by the student or their accusers. 

At Uppsala University, if there is “well-founded suspicion of attempted deceptive conduct”, then any decisions on examining the students work are deferred until after a decision. 

At Stockholm, though, the student can continue to participate in “instruction, examinations, and other activities related to his or her studies”, until a decision has been made. 

Stockholm, unlike Uppsala, details what happens when multiple students are involved. Each should be able to to give their own account. 

Matter dismissed

If the academic staff investigating the cheating decide that the plagiarism is either the result of carelessness or lack of knowledge, or that there has been some misunderstanding, then they need to submit an official memorandum detailing how they dealt with the claims.

Even if the cheating accusations are dismissed, the student may still be failed for the exam or assignment if the person marking it deems that it does “not measure up to the course goals”.

The formal report 

If the academic staff investigating the cheating decide that the plagiarism is not the result of carelessness or lack of knowledge, and that there was an intention to deceive, then the examiner and the head of department, or director of studies, have to submit a report. 

The report is addressed to the Vice Chancellor of the university, signed by the responsible head of department or director of studies, and submitted to the Registrar at the University Administration.

The department also needs to brief the student about what is in the report, and also give them information in writing. 

The student should also be put in contact with the right person at the student union to help them in their case. 

At Stockholm University, but it seems not Uppsala, the student can comment on the report. 

The Disciplinary Board

Both Uppsala and Stockholm University have a Disciplinary Board, which assign an officer to further investigate the case, and present their findings to the Vice-Chancellor. 

The Vice-Chancellor then, in consultation with the officer, decides whether to dismiss the matter without action, issue a formal warning to the student, or refer the matter to the Disciplinary Board. 

The board includes the Vice-Chancellor, a legally qualified member, a teacher representative and two representatives from the student unions.

At Stockholm, the student might be temporarily suspended once their conduct is submitted to the board. 

At the hearing a representative from the department concerned and the accused student can each make their case about what happened, after which they leave the room. 

The board then informs the student and his department on its decision, which can be to dismiss the student, give a warning, or to suspend the student from their studies, a decision which comes into force immediately. 

Stockholm says that suspension means the student is prohibited from “instruction, examinations, or any other activities related to courses and study programmes at Stockholm University” during the period of suspension.

They may also be forced to repay student grants and study loans covering the period of the suspension. 

The appeals process

Students have the right to appeal the decision to suspend them to Sweden’s Administrative Court (förvaltningsrätten), and can also apply for a “stay” of the decision while their case is held. 

SHOW COMMENTS