SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

LAW

Why do laws in Spain take so long to come into force?

Laws in Spain can take a long time to pass, often having to be approved by various different government bodies, but why is that? What's the process and how does it work?

Why do laws in Spain take so long to come into force?
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez debating a law in Congress. Photo: PIERRE-PHILIPPE MARCOU/AFP.

In Spain, draft legislation becoming law and then finally coming into force can be a long and complex process that bounces drafts and amendments around between the government and both houses of Congress.

Often there are amendments made at various stages and slowing progress, such as with the housing law which saw hundreds of amendments proposed and made throughout 2022.

READ ALSO: Spain’s new housing law enters into force: Five key points you should know

As a result, draft bills can take often months and months to actually become law, and you’ll often hear of a law being ‘approved’ by one chamber only to be rejected by the other.

This means that there can be a significant amount of time between when you first hear about policy being floated by the government, to a bill being debated in the Spanish Congress, to when it is approved, and then, finally, coming into force. 

Spain’s Asociación de Periodistas Parlamentarios estimates that the average bill takes around five months to be approved from start to finish, and they can take much longer when the proposed law is particularly controversial.

What’s the reason for the long delays?

Different laws

First of all, it’s important to understand the different types of laws in Spain. Government, opposition parties, and regional governments can all propose new legislation, but in reality, it is the elected government of the day driving the legislative agenda.

  • Organic laws: these deal with fundamental rights and public freedoms; as well dealing with other issues specified by the Spanish Constitution including the Council of State, Royal Family, as well as states of alarm.
  • Ordinary laws: rules that deal with the rest of the issues.
  • Royal decree-laws: special laws used in cases of “extraordinary and urgent need” but cannot deal with issues such as fundamental rights or the basic institutions of the State, among others. The government approves them in the Council of Ministers and the Congress votes on their validation or repeal within a maximum period of one month, so they are pushed through a little faster.
  • Legislative decree: new rules or changes approved by the government because the Spanish Courts delegate this power to create an articulated text (create new regulations on a matter) or recast already existing provisions in other rules.

How does this draft proposal actually become law?

The process

Government draft

We usually first hear about laws when the Spanish Cabinet presents a draft law and proposes it to Congress.

Technically speaking, before sending it to the Congress for approval, the government must first publish a public consultation online, explaining what the changes will be and how they will affect people. It must also write impact reports after consulting with the relevant ministries from the Council of State, the Fiscal Council or the Ministry of Finance and Public Administrations on the anticipated consequences of the legislation.

Presentation 

Laws are debated in the Congress of Deputies. Photo: FERNANDO ALVARADO / POOL / AFP

After getting feedback on the proposed changes, the government must then formally present the proposed law to the Congress.

In Spain, like in many parliamentary democracies, there are two houses or chambers. Laws first go to the lower house, the Congress of Deputies of Spain (Congreso de los Diputados).

When sending the bill, the government must also supply a statement justifying why it is necessary and explaining its background with the reports supplied by the different government departments at the initial draft stage.

Then there is a period of 15 working days during which the parties in the Congress of Deputies can study the law and propose amendments.

Typically there are two types of amendments proposed: a total amendment that fundamentally disagrees with the bill and demands it be rewritten, or an amendment to a specific article within the bill.

Debate (Deputies)

Then the bill is debated in the Congress of Deputies. Often the government comes under serious attack from opposition parties at this stage, and all viewpoints are heard.

First, a member of the government explains the bill. Then the parliamentary groups proposing slight rewrites make their case, then those rejecting the bill and demanding a total rewrite, followed by a vote on the proposed changes, which must gain the support of a simple majority.

Amendments (Deputies)

Once amendments are formally lodged, a commission is set up to study the draft report and go through the text article by article, and a vote is held on the amendments.

Back to Government

Any proposed amendments that pass the committee stage and government budgetary costs, in other words, increase the cost of the policy or decrease the income it will generate, are sent back to the government and must be approved by La Moncloa – the home of the Spanish executive.

If the Prime Minister does not give a response within the next 15 days, the amendments are accepted.

The vote (Deputies)

After all that, the lower house must then vote on the amended bill before sending it on.

The session begins, again, with a presentation of the updated bill by a member of the government and testimony of a commission member who reviews the changes.

Then the Deputies vote, and in order to pass the bill, must be supported by a simple majority before being sent ‘upstairs’.

The Senate

The bill then goes up to the Senate, where there’s the possibility of a veto and new amendments can be proposed.

The Senate doesn’t go through entirely the same process however, as it receives the bill already pre-approved by the Deputies and it is thought (hoped) that a lot of the legal minutia has been ironed out in the lower house.

The bill is first passed onto the relevant Senate committees to be studied. 

Senators can then propose their own amendments, and if so, they are sent back down to the Deputies where they must be approved (or rejected) by a simple majority. If you’ve ever watched the Spanish Congress live on TV, this is often when there can be some political fireworks and entertaining back and forth as the various parties debate the pros and cons of the bill.

But if they don’t have any changes, the bill is voted on and it can either be ratified by a simple majority, which would mean the bill is (finally) approved), or vetoed with an absolute majority.

If it does not pass, it goes back downstairs and the vote is repeated again two months later, by which time a simple majority becomes sufficient.

The King and BOE

Once approved, the law is formally sanctioned by the King (similar to getting Royal Ascent in the United Kingdom) and then published as official government policy in the Official State Bulletin or BOE. 

Only then, months after the initial draft and tens if not hundreds of amendments later, once the bill has bounced around the Congress, does it become law and be enforced. 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

BREAKING

Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez will not resign

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez on Monday announced that he has decided to continue as PM after taking a five-day hiatus from office following a dubious corruption investigation into his wife's business dealings.

Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez will not resign

“I’ve decided to continue, with more strength if possible, in charge of the premiership of Spain’s government” Pedro Sánchez said from the Moncloa palace in Madrid, his official residence.

Sánchez announced last Wednesday that he was mulling resignation after a Madrid court opened a preliminary probe into suspected influence peddling and corruption targeting his wife Begoña Gómez.

READ ALSO: Who is Begoña Gómez? Spanish PM’s partner thrust into spotlight

“I need to stop and think whether I should continue to head the government or whether I should give up this honour,” he wrote in a four-page letter posted on X, formerly Twitter.

Upon announcing his decision to stay, Sánchez said that “my wife and I know that the smear campaign will not stop, but it is not the most relevant thing, we can handle it.”

Denying the move was a “political calculation”, Sánchez said he needed “to stop and reflect” on the growing polarisation within politics which he said was increasingly being driven by “deliberate disinformation”.

“For too long we’ve let this filth corrupt our political and public life with toxic methods that were unimaginable just a few years ago… Do we really want this for Spain?” he asked.

“I have acted out of a clear conviction: either we say ‘enough is enough’ or this degradation of public life will define our future and condemn us as a country.

“Let us show the world how democracy is defended, let us put an end to this smearing in the only possible way, through collective, serene, democratic rejection, beyond acronyms and ideologies, which I am committed to do firmly as Prime Minister of the Government of Spain”, Sánchez argued.

Spain’s public prosecutor’s office on Thursday requested the dismissal of the investigation into Begoña Gómez’s business dealings.

“I ask Spanish society to once again be an example and inspiration for a wounded world,” the 52-year-old said, calling for a popular mobilisation to “decide what we want to be”, which makes way “for fair play”.

Thousands of supporters massed outside the headquarters of Sánchez’s Socialist party in Madrid on Saturday chanting “Pedro, stay!”.

“We want to thank you for all the support we’ve received,” Sánchez said on Monday. “Thanks to this mobilisation, I have decided to continue as Prime Minister”.

In response to the news, Minister of Foreign Affairs José Manuel Albares said “I am very happy about the decision that the PM has just announced, it is good for Spain, for progressive policies and for Spain’s leadership position in Europe and in the world.”

“What great news. Today democracy wins,” tweeted Patxi López, spokesperson for the PSOE in Congress.

For his part, former Consumer Affairs Minister Alberto Garzón argued that “Pedro Sánchez has made the right decision. Now it is time to make many in-depth reforms to neutralise the entire strategy and dynamics of the reactionary bloc”, in reference to right-wing parties PP and Vox.

Not everyone has been so positive with Sánchez’s announcement, however. Gabriel Rufián, head of Catalan separatist party ERC which supported the Socialist leader’s in his 2023 investiture vote, described Sánchez’s yo-yoing as a “frivolous act”.

Catalan regional president Pere Aragonès called it “five days of comedy” and a “smokescreen”. 

Right-wing PP leader Alberto Núñez Feijóo told a press conference that Sánchez had “made a fool of himself” and “used his Majesty (King Felipe VI) as a supporting actor in his film”, in reference to the PM’s meeting with the monarch earlier on Monday.

Madrid’s populist right-wing regional leader Isabel Díaz Ayuso slammed Sánchez’s behaviour as “absolute shamelessness”.

And the leader of far-right party Vox, Santiago Abascal, warned that “the worst of Sánchez is yet to come” and that Spain needs “an urgent and viable alternative” to him.

Had Sánchez decided to resign, his first Deputy Prime Minister María Jesús Montero would have temporarily taken over as Prime Minister until King Felipe VI designated a new candidate and the Spanish Parliament voted on whether they should be elected as Spain’s new PM.

‘Harassment’ campaign

The court opened its investigation into Sánchez’s wife in response to a complaint by anti-corruption pressure group Manos Limpias (Clean Hands), whose leader is linked to the far right.

Shortly after Sánchez’s bombshell letter went out on X, the group, which has presented a litany of unsuccessful lawsuits against politicians in the past, said it had based its complaint on media reports and could not vouch for their veracity.

While the court did not give details of the case, online news site El Confidencial said it was related to her ties to several private companies that received government funding or won public contracts.

Sánchez has been vilified by right-wing opponents and media because his minority government relies on the support of the hard left and Catalan and Basque separatist parties to pass laws.

They have been especially angered by his decision to grant an amnesty to hundreds of Catalan separatists facing legal action over their roles in the northeastern region’s failed push for independence in 2017.

That amnesty, in exchange for the support of Catalan separatist parties, still needs final approval in parliament.

The opposition has since Wednesday mocked Sánchez’s decision to withdraw from his public duties as an attempt to rally his supporters.

“A head of government can’t make a show of himself like a teenager and have everyone running after him, begging him not to leave and not to get angry,” said right-wing opposition leader and Popular Party head Alberto Núñez Feijóo on Thursday.

SHOW COMMENTS