SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

POLITICS

Why do many foreigners in Switzerland support an anti-immigration political party?

Among the findings of a recent survey into how people in Switzerland view their country, a surprising phenomenon emerged: many foreigners support a right-wing party that would like to limit their rights.

Why do many foreigners in Switzerland support an anti-immigration political party?
A picture taken on September 13, 2020 Geneva shows an electoral poster by right-wing SwissPeople’Party (SVP) showing a cartoon foreign worker crushing the map of Switzerlan. The message in French says "Too much is too much!" Photo by Fabrice COFFRINI / AFP

The study of 50,000 residents from all linguistic regions carried out by Tamedia, Switzerland’s largest media organisation, revealed some interesting facts about how people living in Switzerland, including foreign nationals, feel about the country, and about each other.

READ ALSO: What the Swiss like and dislike about their country… and each other

Feedback that foreign study participants provided indicated that 77 percent of them are happy in Switzerland, even though 68 percent find Swiss people to be aloof, and 60 percent have had problems making friends.

Additionally, 60 percent of foreign respondents say the Swiss are racist.

READ ALSO: Switzerland acknowledges ‘systemic racism’ in the country

Left versus right

With the exception of several cantons and municipalities where foreigners can vote on local issues, they have no right to participate in this political process at the federal level — either in referendums or elections. 

However, the survey revealed interesting facts about what party affiliation foreigners would most likely choose if they did have the right to vote.

A large support for two diametrically opposed parties emerged: while 21.7 percent said they would favour the left-leaning Social Democrats, exactly the same proportion would support the right-wing Swiss People’s Party (SVP). (A smaller group of foreigners, ranging from 5.8 to 14.5 percent, would back other, less conflictual parties).

The support for Social Democrats (known as ‘socialists’ in Switzerland), could be understood in the context of their foreigner-friendly policies.

For example, the party has developed a platform especially for migrants, aiming to help them with their specific challenges, including the naturalisation process. 

Far more surprising, however, is the support for the populist SVP, whose main position has traditionally been that immigrants are bad for Switzerland.

The party has spearheaded a number of campaigns and referendums over the years aiming to curb immigration, and generally portraying foreigners as wanting to destroy Switzerland by taking jobs away from the Swiss, abusing the welfare system, and committing crimes.

Its infamous 2016 poster, for instance, showing a white sheep kicking a black one out of Switzerland made international news for its racial and xenophobic undertones.

So why would so many foreigners in Switzerland support the SVP?

The answer is provided by Lucas Leeman, the author of the above-mentioned study.

“I think it is important to recognise that foreigners in Switzerland are a very heterogenous group,” he said. “The most decisive factor for the vote decision is a person’s socio-economic position — and that holds true for both, Swiss citizens and foreigners. “

This means that many foreigners are conservative and their views on some issues align with like-minded parties.

“While it may be surprising that the Swiss People’s Party reaches that share [of support among foreigners], one should consider that they do take a clear conservative position and a kind of a ‘tough politics’ approach also on other issues,” he said.

This stance on social issues strikes a chord among many foreigners.

For instance, the SVP is the only opponent among Swiss parties to legalised abortion and same sex marriage, and that “can be very appealing for some foreigners,” Leeman said.

He added, however, that “the situation could potentially change if one day foreigners were granted the right to vote and parties would start to directly communicate with that segment of the population.”

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

POLITICS

Swiss earmark 10 million francs for UNRWA in Gaza

Switzerland is proposing to give $11 million to the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, specifically for tackling the humanitarian crisis in Gaza triggered by the war between Israel and Hamas.

Swiss earmark 10 million francs for UNRWA in Gaza

The government’s proposal, announced Wednesday after weeks of procrastination, represents half of the amount which was initially set to be paid to the UNRWA (The United Nations Relief and Works Agency) in 2024.

“Switzerland’s 10 million Swiss francs contribution to UNRWA will be restricted to Gaza and will cover the most pressing basic needs, such as food, water, shelter, basic healthcare and logistics,” a government statement said.

Switzerland “is fully aware of the critical nature of this situation and recognises the urgent need for action”.

UNRWA, which coordinates nearly all aid to Gaza, has been in crisis since January when Israel accused about a dozen of its 13,000 Gaza employees of being involved in the October 7th Hamas attack on Israel.

This led many donor nations, including the United States and Switzerland, to abruptly suspend funding to the agency, threatening its efforts to deliver desperately-needed aid in Gaza, where the UN has warned of an impending famine.

An independent review group of UNRWA, led by French former foreign minister Catherine Colonna, found some “neutrality-related issues” but said Israel had yet to provide evidence for its chief allegations.

In making its decision, the Swiss government said it “drew on the analysis of the Colonna report and coordination with other donors”.

The government’s decision must still be submitted to parliament’s foreign affairs committees for consultation.

On April 30th, the Swiss head of UNRWA, Philippe Lazzarini, said that of the $450 million in funding that had been frozen by donors, $267 million was still suspended, the bulk of it by Washington.

Gaza’s bloodiest-ever war began following Hamas’s unprecedented October 7th attack on Israel that resulted in the deaths of more than 1,170 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally of Israeli official figures.

Vowing to destroy Hamas, Israel has conducted a retaliatory offensive that has killed more than 34,800 people in Gaza, mostly women and children, according to the Hamas-run territory’s health ministry.

Switzerland “reiterates its call for a humanitarian ceasefire, unhindered access for emergency aid to Gaza, compliance with international humanitarian law, and the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages,” the government said.

SHOW COMMENTS