SHARE
COPY LINK

JULY 22ND

Norway court rejects Breivik bid for prison release

A Norwegian court on Tuesday rejected a request for parole from neo-Nazi Anders Behring Breivik 10 years after he was convicted of killing 77 people in the country's deadliest peacetime terror attack.

A 2016 file photo taken during an earlier court proceeding involving Norwegian far-right terrorist Anders Breivik.
A 2016 file photo taken during an earlier court proceeding involving Norwegian far-right terrorist Anders Breivik. Photo: JONATHAN NACKSTRAND / AFP

“There is a clear risk that (Breivik) will resume the behaviour that led to the July 22nd terrorist attacks,” said the court in Norway’s south-eastern region of Telemark, dismissing his request for conditional early release.

Breivik has never expressed any remorse for the attacks that left 77 people dead, and Tuesday’s ruling was widely expected.

On July 22nd, 2011, the right-wing extremist set off a truck bomb near government offices in Oslo, killing eight people, before heading to the island of Utøya where, disguised as a police officer, he shot dead 69 others, mostly teens, attending a Labour Party youth-wing summer camp.

He said he killed his victims because they embraced multiculturalism.

Now aged 42, Breivik was in 2012 sentenced to 21 years in prison, Norway’s harshest sentence which can be extended as long as he is considered a threat to society.

He was at the time ordered to serve a minimum of 10 years before he could request parole, which he did during a three-day hearing held last month.

While his chance of parole was minimal from the start, Breivik took advantage of his court appearances and the media attention they garnered to spread his ideological propaganda.

READ ALSO: Norwegian court told Breivik as dangerous now as a decade ago

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

CRIME

Norway says terrorist Breivik still poses risk of ‘unbridled violence’

Anders Behring Breivik, the far-right terrorist who killed 77 people in 2011, still poses a risk of "totally unbridled violence", the Norwegian state argued Tuesday in a lawsuit over his prison conditions.

Norway says terrorist Breivik still poses risk of 'unbridled violence'

Breivik has sued the state, claiming his extended isolation is a violation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which prohibits “inhumane” and “degrading” treatment.

Now 44, he has been held apart from other inmates in high-security facilities for over 11 years.

The trial, which opened on Monday, is being held for security reasons in the gymnasium of Ringerike prison where Breivik is serving his sentence.

More than 12 years after committing the bloodiest attack on Norwegian soil since World War II, Breivik still poses “an absolutely extreme risk of totally unbridled violence”, the state’s lawyer Andreas Hjetland told the court.

On July 22nd, 2011, Breivik set off a bomb near government offices in Oslo, killing eight people, before gunning down 69 others, mostly teens, at a Labour
Party youth wing summer camp on the island of Utoya.

He was sentenced in 2012 to 21 years in prison, which can be extended as long as he is considered a threat, which was Norway’s harshest sentence at the time.

“Breivik represents the same danger today as on July 21st, 2011,” the eve of the twin attacks he prepared meticulously for years, Hjetland said, citing
assessments written by psychiatrists and prison wardens.

“His ideology remains the same, his aptitude for unlimited violence is evident and his personality… further reinforces all these factors,” he said.

On Monday, Breivik’s lawyer Oystein Storrvik had asked for an easing of his client’s prison conditions, claiming that they had made Breivik “suicidal” and depressed.

Citing another article of the Convention on Human Rights that guarantees the right to correspondence, Breivik has also asked for an easing of restrictions on his incoming and outgoing letters.

In 2016, Breivik sued the Norwegian state on the same grounds, with a lower court ruling in his favour before higher courts found in the state’s favour. In 2018, the European Court of Human Rights dismissed his case as “inadmissible”.

SHOW COMMENTS