SHARE
COPY LINK

MONARCHY

Swiss prosecutors close corruption case against Spain ex-king

Swiss prosecutors said Monday they have closed a case against former Spanish king Juan Carlos over suspicions he received €88 million in kickbacks for facilitating a high-speed rail contract in Saudi Arabia awarded to a Spanish consortium.

Spain´s former King Juan Carlos has been involved in a number of scandals over the past decade. (Photo by OSCAR DEL POZO / AFP)
Spain's former King Juan Carlos has been involved in a number of scandals over the past decade. (Photo by OSCAR DEL POZO / AFP)

After three years of investigation, the Geneva top prosecutor’s office said in a statement that the money transferred into a Swiss bank account had “not been sufficiently documented”.

But it said the probe had  “not permitted to establish in a sufficient manner a link between the amount received from Saudi Arabia and the contract to build the high-speed train.”

Geneva prosecutors opened their probe on August 6th, 2018 into suspicions of “aggravated money laundering” against the 83-year-old former monarch following media reports about possible illegal commissions he had pocketed in connection with the high-speed train deal.

A Spanish consortium was awarded the lucrative contract in 2011 to build the high-speed rail link between Medina and Mecca.

The suspicions centred on $100 million (€88.6 million) that Saudi Arabia’s late King Abdullah deposited in 2008 into a Swiss bank account to which Juan Carlos had access.

The Geneva prosecutors said their investigation had established that the money had indeed been deposited into an account with Geneva bank Mirabaud & Cie belonging to the Lucum foundation, for which Juan Carlos held the economic rights.

They also determined that there was evidence the ex-king transferred the bulk of this money in 2012 to an account in the Bahamas belonging to a company held by his former mistress, German businesswoman Corinna Zu Zein-Wittgenstein.

The prosecutors said that the complexity of the transactions, using a foundation and various companies, “showed a will to dissimulation”, but said there was not enough evidence to proceed.

The ex-king, a key figure in Spain’s transition to democracy following the death of dictator Francisco Franco in 1975, has meanwhile also been the target of several probes in Spain over his financial dealings there.

Spanish prosecutors decided earlier this month to push on with their investigation for another six months.

The probes have especially been focused on whether there was any illegal dealings after the former king abdicated in 2004 and lost his immunity.

While he has not been charged with any crime, the probes have tainted his reputation and that of the Spanish monarchy.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

MONARCHY

UK judge throws out harassment case against Spain’s former king

A UK judge on Friday ruled that the former lover of Spain's exiled ex-king Juan Carlos I cannot bring a claim of harassment against him in the courts in London.

UK judge throws out harassment case against Spain's former king

Danish businesswoman Corinna zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn, who is in her late 50s and lives in England, sued Juan Carlos, 85, who abdicated in 2014, for damages of more than £126 million ($154 million) for personal injury.

She alleged that he caused her “great mental pain” by spying on and harassing her.

“The High Court of England and Wales lacks jurisdiction to try this claim,” judge Rowena Collins Rice said in a written judgment on the civil case brought by zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn.

“I was shown no authority coming anywhere near supporting an assumption of English jurisdiction over a foreign-domiciled defendant in such circumstances,” Collins Rice added.

At the same time, “she has not sufficiently established that the ‘harmful event’ of which she complains — harassment by the defendant — happened in England”, the judge ruled.

Corinna Sayn-Wittgenstein in 2015. (Photo by JP Yim / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA / Getty Images via AFP)
 

The judge recognised zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn “has an account she wishes to give of her personal and financial history with the defendant, and about the harm he has caused her peace of mind and personal wellbeing, and her business, social and family life”.

However, she added: “The only question for me has been whether the claimant can compel the defendant to give his side of the story to the High Court. My conclusion, as things stand, is that she cannot.”

Responding to the ruling, Zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn said she was “deeply disappointed” and that it was “disheartening to see that victims of harassment often struggle to find justice in our legal system”.

She added: “Intimidation and harassment of me and my children continues and is aimed at fully collapsing me.

“Juan Carlos has deployed his full armoury to grind me down and the reach of his power is immense.

“I am considering all options,” she added.

Juan Carlos, who is married, was in an “intimate romantic relationship” with the divorcee from 2004 to 2009 and showered her with gifts, according to previous court submissions.

Zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn alleged that Juan Carlos began harassing her after their relationship broke down, using threats, break-ins at her properties and surveillance.

Gunshots damaged security cameras at the front gate of her property, she alleged, accusing the former king of being angry at her refusals.

The couple’s relationship became known in 2012, when the monarch broke a hip while on holiday in Botswana with Zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn and had to be flown home, sparking public anger during a period of record unemployment in Spain.

Two years later, dogged by scandals and health problems, Juan Carlos abdicated at the age of 76 in favour of his son, Felipe VI, who has now publicly distanced himself from his father.

He went into self-imposed exile in the United Arab Emirates in 2020.

Three appeal judges in London in December ruled his ex-lover could not sue him for harassment in the English courts for the period while he was on the throne as he had immunity as sovereign.

But they left open the possibility that she could pursue him for his alleged behaviour after his abdication.

SHOW COMMENTS