SHARE
COPY LINK

EUROPEAN UNION

Germany set to turn back clocks: Will this be the last time?

It’s that time of year again: on Sunday, clocks across Europe will go back an hour to mark the start of winter time on the continent. But could next year mark the end of twice-yearly ritual?

Germany set to turn back clocks: Will this be the last time?
This Sunday will see clocks across Europe go back one hour. Photo: DPA

Spring forward, fall back – a handy mnemonic to remember which way to turn your clock this weekend. 

At 3am on Sunday October 25th, the clock will go back one hour to Central European Time, meaning it will get darker earlier (but offering us all an extra hour’s sleep).

If the EU Parliament had its way, this practice would come to an end next year. But it remains to be seen if the time change, which is very unpopular amongst Germans, will actually be scrapped. 

READ ALSO: Everything that changes in Germany in October 2020

“The time change should be abolished”, declared former European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker in 2018, after 84 percent of those asked in an EU-wide survey voted to scrap it. 

In March 2019, the European Parliament voted with a significant majority to scrap seasonal clock changes as of 2021.

But the ball now lies in the court of individual member states, who each have to decide whether they want to remain permanently on Summer or Winter Time. 

A unified approach?

But making that decision is easier said than done. EU diplomats announced this week that the topic would get no real discussion time for the remainder of Germany’s stint as President of the EU Council this year.

They explained that there are many other topics more pressing than clock changes. The Council itself also shared that it has not yet reached a conclusion on the issue, for that would require “a qualified majority of member states”.

According to the Federal Ministry of Economy, the German government is also yet to make a decision. 

“We believe it is important to ensure that there aren’t certain countries running on a different time to others nearby so that we still have a harmonized internal market” said the Ministry. 

A Europe-wide impact assessment is also needed for “an appropriate and harmonized approach”, it said. 

“The EU Commission has not yet submitted such an impact assessment,” says Minister Peter Altmaier of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU).

New daylight hours

The consequences of a change to the status quo would be considerable. In the EU there are currently three time zones, the largest of which being Central European Time, which spans from Spain to Poland.

If the clocks switched to permanent Summer Time, it would only get light at mid-morning in the North and North West.

On December 21st in Vigo, on the west coast of Spain, the sun would not rise until 10:01am, while in Brest in the French Province of Brittany it wouldn’t get light until 10:07am.

A permanent Winter Time wouldn’t just mean that bar goers and beach revellers would have to get used to it getting dark earlier.

READ ALSO: More Germans 'suffer health problems after clock changes'

In parts of Eastern Europe, the sun would also rise extremely early: on June 21st, it would start getting light at 03:01am in the Polish town of Bialystok, 03:15am in Warsaw and 03.44am in Berlin. 

Nonetheless, the current clock changes cause problems for many people. According to a survey carried out by health insurance company DAK-Gesundheit, 29 percent of people in Germany suffer from physical or psychological problems after a time change.

They reported feeling limp or tired, as well as having difficulty falling or staying asleep. Another 76 percent of those surveyed found that the changeover was pointless and should be abolished.

The survey carried out by Juncker suggests that Germans are more passionate about the issue than citizens of other EU-countries.

Of the 4.6 million people who took part in the survey, three million came from Germany – although the survey only represented one percent of the total EU population. 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

BREXIT

OPINION: Pre-Brexit Brits in Europe should be given EU long-term residency

The EU has drawn up plans to make it easier for non-EU citizens to gain longterm EU residency so they can move more easily around the bloc, but Italy-based citizens' rights campaigner Clarissa Killwick says Brits who moved to the EU before Brexit are already losing out.

OPINION: Pre-Brexit Brits in Europe should be given EU long-term residency

With all the talk about the EU long-term residency permit and the proposed improvements there is no mention that UK citizens who are Withdrawal Agreement “beneficiaries” are currently being left out in the cold.

The European Commission has stated that we can hold multiple statuses including the EU long-term permit (Under a little-known EU law, third-country nationals can in theory acquire EU-wide long-term resident status if they have lived ‘legally’ in an EU country for at least five years) but in reality it is just not happening.

This effectively leaves Brits locked into their host countries while other third country nationals can enjoy some mobility rights. As yet, in Italy, it is literally a question of the computer saying no if someone tries to apply.

The lack of access to the EU long-term permit to pre-Brexit Brits is an EU-wide issue and has been flagged up to the European Commission but progress is very slow.

READ ALSO: EU government settle on rules for how non-EU citizens could move around Europe

My guess is that few UK nationals who already have permanent residency status under the Withdrawal Agreement are even aware of the extra mobility rights they could have with the EU long-term residency permit – or do not even realise they are two different things.

Perhaps there won’t be very large numbers clamouring for it but it is nothing short of discrimination not to make it accessible to British people who’ve built their lives in the EU.

They may have lost their status as EU citizens but nothing has changed concerning the contributions they make, both economically and socially.

An example of how Withdrawal Agreement Brits in Italy are losing out

My son, who has lived almost his whole life here, wanted to study in the Netherlands to improve his employment prospects.

Dutch universities grant home fees rather than international fees to holders of an EU long-term permit. The difference in fees for a Master’s, for example, is an eye-watering €18,000. He went through the application process, collecting the requisite documents, making the payments and waited many months for an appointment at the “questura”, (local immigration office).

On the day, it took some persuading before they agreed he should be able to apply but then the whole thing was stymied because the national computer system would not accept a UK national. I am in no doubt, incidentally, that had he been successful he would have had to hand in his WA  “carta di soggiorno”.

This was back in February 2022 and nothing has budged since then. In the meantime, it is a question of pay up or give up for any students in the same boat as my son. There is, in fact, a very high take up of the EU long-term permit in Italy so my son’s non-EU contemporaries do not face this barrier.

Long-term permit: The EU’s plan to make freedom of movement easier for non- EU nationals 

Completing his studies was stalled by a year until finally his Italian citizenship came through after waiting over 5 years.  I also meet working adults in Italy with the EU long-term permit who use it for work purposes, such as in Belgium and Germany, and for family reunification.  

Withdrawal agreement card should double up as EU long-term residency permit

A statement that Withdrawal Agreement beneficiaries should be able to hold multiple statuses is not that easy to find. You have to scroll quite far down the page on the European Commission’s website to find a link to an explanatory document. It has been languishing there since March 2022 but so far not proved very useful.

It has been pointed out to the Commission that the document needs to be multilingual not just in English and “branded” as an official communication from the Commission so it can be used as a stand-alone. But having an official document you can wave at the immigration authorities is going to get you nowhere if Member State governments haven’t acknowledged that WA beneficiaries can hold multiple statuses and issue clear guidance and make sure systems are modified accordingly.

I can appreciate this is no mean feat in countries where they do not usually allow multiple statuses or, even if they do, issue more than one residency card. Of course, other statuses we should be able to hold are not confined to EU long-term residency, they should include the EU Blue Card, dual nationality, family member of an EU citizen…

Personally, I do think people should be up in arms about this. The UK and EU negotiated an agreement which not only removed our freedom of movement as EU citizens, it also failed to automatically give us equal mobility rights to other third country nationals. We are now neither one thing nor the other.

It would seem the only favour the Withdrawal Agreement did us was we didn’t have to go out and come back in again! Brits who follow us, fortunate enough to get a visa, may well pip us at the post being able to apply for EU long-term residency as clearly defined non-EU citizens.

I have been bringing this issue to the attention of the embassy in Rome, FCDO and the European Commission for three years now. I hope we will see some movement soon.

Finally, there should be no dragging of heels assuming we will all take citizenship of our host countries. Actually, we shouldn’t have to, my son was fortunate, even though it took a long time. Others may not meet the requirements or wish to give up their UK citizenship in countries which do not permit dual nationality.  

Bureaucratic challenges may seem almost insurmountable but why not simply allow our Withdrawal Agreement permanent card to double up as the EU long-term residency permit.

Clarissa Killwick,

Since 2016, Clarissa has been a citizens’ rights campaigner and advocate with the pan-European group, Brexpats – Hear Our Voice.
She is co-founder and co-admin of the FB group in Italy, Beyond Brexit – UK citizens in Italy.

SHOW COMMENTS