SHARE
COPY LINK

HEALTH

Italy’s biggest cities ‘out of control’, warns health expert as new cases top 15,000

As Italy's new cases hit a record high, one of the government's top health advisors has warned that the biggest Italian cities are already beyond the point where tracing and testing can contain the surge.

Italy's biggest cities 'out of control', warns health expert as new cases top 15,000
Passengers non a crowded metro in Milan this week. Photo: Miguel Medina/AFP

“Certain metropolitan areas like Milan, Naples and probably Rome are already out of control in terms of containing the pandemic,” said infectious disease expert Walter Ricciardi, who advises Italy's health ministry on Covid-19.

“Their numbers are too high to be contained by the traditional method of tracing and testing. And as previous epidemics teach us, when you can't contain you have to mitigate, namely you have to block movement.”

Italy reported another record increase in coronavirus infections on Wednesday, registering 15,199 new cases in 24 hours. 

Another 127 people died, up from 89 the previous day.

Two of the regions currently reporting the highest numbers of new cases, Lombardy and Campania, have imposed the strictest limits on movement since Italy ended its nationwide lockdown.

In Campania, residents are now restricted from leaving their own province unless it's essential, while in Lombardy from Thursday people must stay indoors nightly between 11pm and 5am. 

READ ALSO: Curfews, closures and distance learning: How Italy's regions are tightening Covid-19 restrictions

The northern region on Wednesday reported its highest number of new cases in one day since the pandemic began, detecting more than 4,000 positives out of some 36,000 tests in the past 24 hours.

In Lombardy's biggest city, Milan, a field hospital in a conference centre has been reopened as local authorities brace for a surge in more serious cases.

As regions tighten the rules locally, some experts are calling for new national restrictions – something that the government has so far resisted since phasing out its long and costly lockdown in May.

Having acted swiftly at the beginning of the emergency, Italy “has followed the decision-making model of other countries, whose leaders had neither the courage, the capacity nor the timing to take the right decisions at the right moment,” said Ricciardi on Wednesday, in comments to a webinar quoted by Rai News.

He urged politicians “to be brave and understand that you can't rebuild the economic fabric unless you secure your people's safety”. 

READ ALSO: 

But Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte insisted that Italy could avoid another general lockdown.

“We can't use the same strategy to fight the second wave as we did in spring,” he told the senate on Wednesday. “Now we're in a different situation that we were in in March: back then we didn't have the means to diagnose, now we're readier thanks to the hard work and sacrifices of all.”

Schools would remain open, Conte said, albeit with partial distance learning for older pupils, and the government would avoid general, nationwide closures of businesses.

Yet the prime minister encouraged people to stay at home voluntarily: “We must all strive to limit infections, to limit unnecessary travel. If we make these sacrifices, we will avoid harder measures.” 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

BREXIT

‘In the dark’: Why Brits in Italy are still unable to prove rights to free healthcare

Despite UK and Italian authorities confirming that British residents covered by post-Brexit rules are entitled to healthcare in Italy, many still face "significant problems" in accessing it, the British government has said.

'In the dark': Why Brits in Italy are still unable to prove rights to free healthcare

Cancer patients are among those in need of treatment but unable to access the Italian national health service amid confusion over post-Brexit rules, campaigners say, after clarifications from the UK and Italian governments have so far failed to resolve bureaucratic deadlocks at local authority level.

Since the end of the Brexit transition period in 2021, many British nationals resident in Italy covered by the Withdrawal Agreement (WA) have reported difficulties in proving their right to free healthcare under the Italian public system.

The problem was exacerbated this year after the Italian government in January hiked the minimum annual fee for ‘voluntary’ healthcare registration from €387 to €2,000, which many said they were unable to pay.

The British government in February stepped in to clarify that UK nationals covered by the WA should not be subject to charges for healthcare, and on its Living in Italy website it advised those affected to show their local health authority office (Azienda Sanitaria Locale, or ASL) an official note published by the Italian health ministry on February 15th which sets out their rights (find it here, in Italian.)

WA beneficiaries “can compulsorily enrol (iscrizione obbligatoria) with the Italian National Health System,” states the final section, pointing out that the deal, “in Article 23, provides for equal treatment with domestic nationals.”

But for some local health officials, even this written confirmation does not appear to be enough to clear up the confusion.

READ ALSO: ‘Life or death situation’: Brits facing high Italian healthcare costs amid rule change uncertainty

The UK government on Friday, May 17th, updated its guidance to say it had become aware that “some beneficiaries of the Withdrawal Agreement are facing significant problems accessing health services and renewing their healthcare cards,” despite its advice to show local health authorities the official note.

British nationals continue to report that local health authorities around Italy remain unwilling to issue them with a health card, while campaigners say the situation is further complicated for some by the fact that Italian authorities have also refused to issue proof of their permanent residency status, which entitles them to free healthcare.

This was the case for Graham Beresford, a British citizen living in Abruzzo who has been diagnosed with a rare cancer and remains unable to access the free healthcare he is entitled to, as he says local authorities don’t understand the post-Brexit rules.

Graham told The Local in April that the government’s clarifications on the issue had made little difference – his ASL continues to demand he pay the 2,000-euro charge.

READ ALSO: Can I get a refund after wrongly paying Italy’s €2,000 healthcare fee?

“Every time I go to my ASL office, I always feel like I’m dismissed,” Graham said. “I told the ASL worker I need medication for my cancer and she replied lots of people come in here with sob stories.

“There genuinely seems to be no compassion whatsoever.”

Graham’s story was reported in The Guardian on May 12th ahead of UK foreign secretary David Cameron’s first major meeting with European commission vice-president Maroš Šefčovič to discuss post-Brexit relations.

Campaigners also wrote to Cameron in April to appeal for help with the “desperate” situation faced by those unable to access care in Italy.

In its update to the Living in Italy website on Friday, the British government stated: “Since [the health ministry’s note] was published, and particularly in recent days and weeks, it has become clear to us that not all Italian authorities are consistently following this guidance.”

“We are urgently speaking to all relevant parts of the Italian government to clarify the situation so that we can give clear advice to those affected as soon as possible. 

“We also know that this problem is linked to the many difficulties some are experiencing with obtaining an attestazione di soggiorno permanente and/or the Carta di Soggiorno permanente. We are working to help with these issues too.

“We will update this page as soon as we have further news.”

READ ALSO: ‘We are desperate’: Why the UK must help Britons with Italian healthcare charges

Clarissa Killwick from Beyond Brexit, a group for UK citizens in Italy, said the situation “should never have been allowed to happen” and that there had been “a series of communication failures and inconsistencies.”

“We’re not far short of five months after the introduction of the €2,000 new minimum for voluntary contributions and there is still no clarity,” she added.

“There are fraught exchanges in public offices because people on both sides of the counter are in the dark or with conflicting information.

“People need information they can rely on, unequivocally. What do you say to someone who is waiting for an operation but has no idea what is going on?”

SHOW COMMENTS