SHARE
COPY LINK

POLITICS

Merkel calls on Germans to avoid travel to coronavirus risk zones

Chancellor Angela Merkel has called on people in Germany to avoid journeys to areas deemed coronavirus high risk.

Merkel calls on Germans to avoid travel to coronavirus risk zones
Angela Merkel and Markus Söder on Thursday. Photo: DPA

Merkel spoke out after a meeting between the federal and state governments on Thursday.

The federal and state leaders spent more than five hours discussing how to tighten coronavirus measures in the face of rising infection rates.

The new regulations agreed on include a minimum fine of €50 for anyone caught without a face mask in places where wearing one is compulsory, such as in shops and on public transport.

Germany also plans to extend a ban on large events from the end of October until December 31st. It will apply to everything from festivals and concerts to large sporting events with spectators.

READ ALSO:

The corona pandemic is a “challenge”, Merkel said after the conference held online. So far, Germany has “come through the pandemic well”, she added.

However, the increase in infections over the summer months was being taken very seriously. “Additional loosening of restrictions cannot be justified,” said Merkel.

She cited private parties and increased holiday-related travel as the reasons for increased infection rates.

“Corona is fully back in Germany,” said Bavarian state premier Markus Söder at the press conference. 

“The numbers are going up too high too soon,” he said, adding that Germany had to prevent a “second lockdown”.

Merkel warns against travel to risk areas

Merkel explained that many of the cases were linked to people returning from risk areas. She warned against people in Germany taking non-essential trips to areas classed as high risk, such as the US and India.

“We have decided today, and this is new, to call for travel to designated risk areas to be avoided wherever possible,” Merkel said.

For months now, people returning from high-risk areas have had to quarantine after travel.

The federal and state governments appealed for people to comply with the quarantine obligations. Checks by local authorities will be stepped up and fines will be imposed if people are caught flouting rules.

“Those who violate the obligation will be subject to severe fines,” said Merkel.

Meanwhile, anyone who knowingly goes on an avoidable trip to a risk area and suffers a loss of earnings due to the quarantine obligation will not be paid compensation in lost wages in future.

READ MORE: Germany agrees nationwide €50 fines for flouting mask rules

Germany earlier this month introduced free mandatory tests for travellers returning from high-risk areas and free voluntary tests for those coming back from elsewhere.

But following concerns that German labs were becoming overburdened, the government will scrap the free tests for those returning from non-risk areas from September 15th. 

Returnees from risk areas will have to go into quarantine and will not be allowed to take a test before the fifth day after their return.

This is to stop an infection from remaining undetected during the last days of the stay abroad. The quarantine can be ended after a negative result of this test. Bavaria will continue to provide free tests, also for returnees from non-risk areas, until at least October 1st.

The government is also set to examine whether people returning from travel should pay for the test themselves.

Differing stances

Under Germany's federal system each state has the right to impose its own coronavirus regulations, leading to a patchwork of rules which many say leads to confusion.

The current penalties on flouting mask rules for instance vary wildly, from €40 in Hamburg and €250 in Bavaria to no fines at all in Brandenburg.

Federal and state governments – with the exception of Saxony-Anhalt – agreed on a minimum fine of €50 for people who violate the obligation to wear a mask.

Saxony-Anhalt's state premier Reiner Haseloff said his state was instead enforcing a ban on public transport for passengers without a face covering.

Private party numbers to be looked at again

Private social gatherings in Germany should be held outdoors when possible – and have as few participants as possible. Merkel and the state leaders were unable to agree on an upper limit on the number of people at gatherings in private homes.

Originally, the government had proposed 25 people as a limit.

“Depending on the regional occurrence of infection, restrictions are to be imposed on private celebrations, for example by lowering the maximum number of participants,” the resolution states.

“The states have very different ideas, which could not be brought together today,” Merkel said. But she wants to “continue discussing the topic”.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

CLIMATE CRISIS

INTERVIEW: ‘Failed climate policies are fuelling far-right politics in Germany’

Alt-right political parties tend to oppose environmental protections, but is there a connection between their political success and climate policy failures? Author and thought-leader Sandrine Dixson-Declève explains why Germany may be having a ‘1930s moment’, and why the next elections are gravely important.

INTERVIEW: 'Failed climate policies are fuelling far-right politics in Germany'

It’s understood that far-right and populist political parties tend to either downplay the realities of climate change, or block progressive policies that would try to mitigate its impacts. But the link between failed climate policies and the recent rise of populist parties is rarely addressed.

Speaking as a panellist at the Green Tech Festival in Berlin on Thursday, climate policy thought-leader Sandrine Dixson-Declève voiced concern that poor climate and economic policies are fuelling the popularity of far-right politics in Germany and across Europe. 

Co-president of the Club of Rome, Dixson-Declève works to promote policies that she believes would help secure a sustainable future for humanity. Such policies are laid out in the book Earth for All: A Survival Guide for Humanity, that she co-authored.

The Local spoke with Sandrine Dixson-Declève about Germany’s climate policy failures, and why she thinks the upcoming European elections are of the utmost importance.

The shortcomings of Germany’s ‘Energiewende’ had serious political consequences

Having been a contributor and advisor to Germany’s Energiewende (energy transition), Dixson-Declève has followed German politics and environmental policy for years.

“I believe that one of the biggest mistakes was that we politicised energy policy in Germany from the outset,” she told The Local, adding, “Merkel actually accepted the big green push to pull out of nuclear, which actually created a big mess.”

Germany’s anti-nuclear energy movement dates back to the 19070s, and led to the foundation of the Green party. Under Merkel’s leadership, a plan was adopted to phase out nuclear power with the last three nuclear power plants taken offline in 2023.

But losing nuclear power as an energy source came with some serious consequences.

“The first big mess was the continued burning of coal,” Dixson-Declève explained. “The second big mess was Nord Stream 2, and that led to the invasion of Ukraine…because it gave Putin power.”

Still, she wouldn’t suggest that Germany try to revive its nuclear power now: “I believe that Germany needs to really think through the next steps.”

READ ALSO: ‘Nuclear power is a dead horse in Germany’: Scholz rejects reopening plants 

Protestors run past riot police

A wave of protestors break through police lines at Lützerath. Open pit coal mining in west Germany destroyed most of the Hambach Forest, as well as dozens of villages such as Lützerath. At both sites massive citizen protests were met with brutal police evictions. Photo by Paul Krantz.

Energy efficiency is the missing piece to Germany’s climate plans

How to build up renewable energy infrastructure is at the centre of most discourse around curbing fossil fuel use, but using the energy we have more efficiently arguably deserves more immediate attention.

“The other missing link, which no one talks about, is energy efficiency,” Dixson-Declève said. “Actually the best energy is the energy you don’t use. That is unsexy, and that is why energy efficiency hasn’t been taken up the way it should have been since 2010.”

While working on climate and energy plans in 2010, she says she came across a study that said Europe could wean itself off of Russian gas just by putting energy efficiency requirements in place for buildings.

In 2022 the European Commission finally began to take this idea seriously when Germany and Europe suddenly needed to replace Russian gas imports, following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Another massive energy saver that has been politicised for all the wrong reasons in Germany is heat pumps.

According to Eurostat data, about half of all energy consumed in the EU is used for heating and cooling, and most of that energy comes from fossil fuels. Heat pumps are significantly more efficient than boilers and allow for greater use of renewable energy sources.

But when Economy Minister Robert Habeck led an effort to promote heat pumps by banning new fossil-powered heating systems, conservative and far-right parties jumped on the issue as if it were an attack on personal freedoms. 

“As environmentalists, we need to get better at translating the environmental narrative into something that resonates with people,” said Dixson-Declève. 

READ ALSO: Reader question – How do I install a heat pump in my German property?

A unified coalition government that is serious about climate protections might have better communicated to people that heat pumps would ultimately save them money: “They should have been enabled in a way that truly assisted people in getting the heat that they needed in an affordable way at the right time.”

‘I am very scared we are in a 1930s moment’

Whereas the coalition government has largely failed to communicate to voters how environmental policies will improve their lives and save them money, conservative and far-right parties have done extremely well at hijacking the narrative. 

The European People’s Party (EPP – the EU’s largest conservative party), for example, is particularly adept at using citizens’ economic concerns to block environmental policies.

Having analysed the EPP’s manifestos, Dixson-Declève notes that they acknowledge the need to mitigate climate change, but say that protections cannot cost. 

“I think the EPP has done a very good job both of putting in fear of the greens, [as if] they’re only going to think about green climate policies and not about social policies [whereas] we’re here to think about you.”

Sandrine Dixson-Declève with Earth for All

Sandrine Dixson-Declève holds up a copy of the book ‘Earth for All’ alongside two of the book’s co-authors. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Wolfgang Kumm

Germany’s far-right parties tend to use similar messaging to try and convince voters that they will better improve the lives of citizens than the current coalition parties have. 

READ ALSO: Why are the far-right AfD doing so well in German polls?

Nearly 100 years ago, the National Socialist (Nazi) party succeeded in drumming up major support along similar lines.

Speaking as a panellist at Berlin’s Green Tech Festival, when asked how she thought European politicians were doing on climate issues, Dixson-Declève described them as deer in the headlights, adding, “I am very scared we are in a 1930s moment”.

“I think that in the 1930s we didn’t see Hitler coming, we didn’t read the tea leaves,” she told The Local, adding that in the present moment, “people are suffering. When people suffer, they look to anything, any message that’s going to make them feel like that next leader is going to help them.” 

She also suggests that we can’t count on the youth vote to save us, citing Argentina and Portugal as two places where young voters have actually pushed politics to the right recently.

READ ALSO: A fight for the youth vote: Are German politicians social media savvy enough?

“This is a tipping moment politically, and if we’re not careful, it could explode in our faces,” said Dixson-Declève. “We need to get as many people to vote this year [as possible]. It’s an absolutely fundamental vote, alongside the United States, in order to make sure that we don’t slide to the right across Europe.”

SHOW COMMENTS