SHARE
COPY LINK

DEBT

Why do nearly half of Swiss households have debts?

New data shows that over 40 percent of the population lives in a household with at least one debt. Large families, the unemployed, and foreigners are the most affected.

Why do nearly half of Swiss households have debts?
Nearly half of Swiss households are in debt. Photo by Fabrice Coffrini / AFP

Given that Switzerland is officially the most expensive country in the world it's perhaps no surprise so many households are in debt.

Payment arrears are the most common type of debt. Nearly one in five people falls into this category, according to a survey on income and living conditions published by the Federal Statistical Office this week. 

The figures cover the year 2017, but they are the most recent available.

Almost 10 percent of the population (9.9 percent) are in debt due to unpaid or late payments of taxes and 7.3 percent of the population are in arrears due to unpaid insurance premiums. These are the two most common forms of household debt in Switzerland.

These debts are the reason 9.9 percent and 7.3 percent of the population, respectively.

But arrears can also relate to rent, mortgage interest, loan payments, alimony, water, electricity, gas, heating, telecommunications, or other bills.

READ MORE: What does Switzerland spend all its money on?

A quarter of families are more indebted than households without children, which make up only 11 percent of the population.
 
And more than a third of people living in single-parent families had faced at least one late payment in the past 12 months.

After the arrears, vehicle leases constitute the most frequent debts — 14.6 percent of Switzerland’s residents have skipped on these car payments.

Next comes money owed to family or friends (10.3 percent) and consumer loans (9 percent).

In total, 42.5 percent of the population lives in a household with at least one type of debt, 18.4 percent with at least two, and 8 percent with at least three.

The latter category is more prevalent in the French-speaking cantons and in Ticino than in German-speaking Switzerland. Families with at least three children (17 percent), the unemployed (15 percent), and immigrants (13 percent) are the most affected.

It is also these three categories which are most often the subject of legal proceedings.

Overall, 7.6 percent of households have at least one person affected by a lawsuit or an act of default of property. More than one in four unemployed people are in this situation, as are 23.8 percent of foreigners and 18.3 percent of large families.

The study also shows that young people tend to be more likely than their elders to buy things they cannot afford. Again, that statistic pertains more to the French than German speakers.
 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

COVID-19

Court turns down AfD-led challenge to Germany’s spending in pandemic

The German Constitutional Court rejected challenges Tuesday to Berlin's participation in the European Union's coronavirus recovery fund, but expressed some reservations about the massive package.

Court turns down AfD-led challenge to Germany's spending in pandemic

Germany last year ratified the €750-billion ($790-billion) fund, which offers loans and grants to EU countries hit hardest by the pandemic.

The court in Karlsruhe ruled on two challenges, one submitted by a former founder of the far-right AfD party, and the other by a businessman.

They argued the fund could ultimately lead to Germany, Europe’s biggest economy, having to take on the debts of other EU member states on a permanent basis.

But the Constitutional Court judges ruled the EU measure does not violate Germany’s Basic Law, which forbids the government from sharing other countries’ debts.

READ ALSO: Germany plans return to debt-limit rules in 2023

The judgement noted the government had stressed that the plan was “intended to be a one-time instrument in reaction to an unprecedented crisis”.

It also noted that the German parliament retains “sufficient influence in the decision-making process as to how the funds provided will be used”.

The judges, who ruled six to one against the challenges, did however express some reservations.

They questioned whether paying out such a large amount over the planned period – until 2026 – could really be considered “an exceptional measure” to fight the pandemic.

At least 37 percent of the funds are aimed at achieving climate targets, the judges said, noting it was hard to see a link between combating global warming and the pandemic.

READ ALSO: Germany to fast-track disputed €200 billion energy fund

They also warned against any permanent mechanism that could lead to EU members taking on joint liability over the long term.

Berenberg Bank economist Holger Schmieding said the ruling had “raised serious doubts whether the joint issuance to finance the fund is in line with” EU treaties.

“The German court — once again — emphasised German limits for EU fiscal integration,” he said.

The court had already thrown out a legal challenge, in April 2021, that had initially stopped Berlin from ratifying the financial package.

Along with French President Emmanuel Macron, then chancellor Angela Merkel sketched out the fund in 2020, which eventually was agreed by the EU’s 27 members in December.

The first funds were disbursed in summer 2021, with the most given to Italy and Spain, both hit hard by the pandemic.

SHOW COMMENTS