SHARE
COPY LINK

SOCIAL DEMOCRATS

EU elections in Denmark: ‘Free movement should also be fair movement’

The Local asked Jeppe Kofod, the Social Democratic lead candidate in the elections for the European Parliament, about his party's role in the EU, free movement, residency and Brexit.

EU elections in Denmark: 'Free movement should also be fair movement'
Jeppe Kofod, Social Democrat lead candidate for the European Parliament elections. Photo: Liselotte Sabroe / Ritzau Scanpix

TL: Many of The Local’s readers may be voting for a Danish party or candidate for the first time as EU nationals in Denmark. Can you present the Social Democrats’ work in the parliament and its core issues in this election?

JK: The Social Democrats seek a strong European community, because problems are best solved by working together. Some problems are so great that they can only be solved by working together.

I am campaigning for an EU commitment in which we work together to address issues such as international tax avoidance, money laundering, climate challenges and the refugee and migrant crisis.

Why should EU citizens who live in Denmark vote for you and the Social Democrats? What can the Social Democrats do for Denmark-based Europeans?

You should vote for me if you want a different type of collaborative work within the EU which solves major, cross-border challenges like the climate crisis, international tax avoidance and money laundering.

The issues that concern me, and which I will fight for us to solve together, are European. It’s not just Danes, but all Europeans who lose out when Google, Apple and Facebook pay under 1 percent in tax on their European profits. That means less money for welfare for all of us.

We can also feel the effects of the climate crisis everywhere – whether we live in Copenhagen or Cologne.

And when I talk about securing good working and employment conditions, that is just as much about fair competition in the Single Market so we all get a fair wage and working conditions, regardless of the passport we have.

What is your view on the right to free movement in the EU?

The Social Democrats believe that free movement should also be fair movement. When wage earners contribute to society through hard work, we want to ensure that their rights to fair wages and working conditions are protected.

That’s why we are working for a standardized ID card for floating and remote workers within the EU. That will make it easier to carry out checks and ensure adequate conditions at places of work.

There should also be extra security for EU citizens who come to Denmark, to make it easier to check they are given the pay they are legally entitled to under Danish collective bargaining agreements.

EU rules state that, after five years’ legal residence in Denmark, EU citizens are entitled to permanent residency here. Where do you stand on that?

In principal, we think that EU member states should regulate their own rules on citizenship and residency. However, we see no acute problems with the EU rules currently in place.

What approach should Denmark take to British citizens who want to live in Denmark after Brexit? Should there be a difference between those already here, and those who want to come later?

I think the Danish state should do everything it can to make Brexit as pain-free as possible for the British residents who want to move to Denmark or continue living here.

It’s important to me that we ensure a good, constructive relationship with the United Kingdom in a purely political sense – and naturally retain the sense of shared belonging which a spell studying or living on the other side of the North Sea can give. That also applies to EU citizens who live in the UK.

But this requires the British parliament to show a little more willingness to cooperate than it has up to now. The British House of Commons has now voted down (Prime Minister Theresa) May’s deal three times, and no to other solutions eight times [in so-called ‘indicative votes’ in parliament, ed.]. British politicians cannot agree on what they are against, or what they are in favour of. You can’t lead a country that way. It is a political betrayal right across the political spectrum.

READ ALSO: Five reasons why the European elections really do matter

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

POLITICS

Social Democrat leader backs Sweden’s harsh new immigration policies

The leader of Sweden's Social Democrat opposition has backed the harsh new policies on crime and immigration included in the new government's programme, and even signalled openness to the much-criticised begging ban.

Social Democrat leader backs Sweden's harsh new immigration policies

In an interview with the Expressen newspaper, Magdalena Andersson said her party was absolutely agreed on the need for a stricter immigration policy for Sweden, going so far as to take credit for the Social Democrats for the illiberal shift. 

“There is absolutely no question that need a strict set of migration laws,” she told the Expressen newspaper, rejecting the claims of Sweden Democrat Jimmie Åkesson that the government’s new program represented a “paradigm shift in migration policy”. 

“The paradigm shift happened in 2015, and it was us who carried it out,” she said. “The big rearrangement of migration policy was carried out by us Social Democrats after the refugee crisis of 2015, with a thoroughgoing tightening up of the policy.” 

READ ALSO:

She said that her party would wait and see what “concrete proposals” the new government ended up making, but she said the Social Democrats were not in principle against even the new government’s most criticised proposal: to slash the number of UN quota refugees from around 5,000 to 900. 

“That’s something we are going to look at,” she said. “It’s been at different levels at different points of time in Sweden.” 

Rather than criticise the new government for being too extreme on migration, Andersson even attacked it for not being willing to go far enough. 

The Social Democrats’ plan to tighten up labour market migration by bringing back the system of labour market testing, she said, was stricter than the plan to increase the salary threshold proposed by Ulf Kristersson’s new government.  

When it comes to the new government’s plans to bring in much tougher punishments for a string of crimes, Andersson criticised the new government for not moving fast enough. 

“What I think is important here is that there are a completed proposals for new laws already on the table which need to be put into effect,” she said. 

She also said she was not opposed to plans for a national ban on begging. 

“We Social Democrats believe that people should have the possibility to get educated, and work so they can support themselves,” she said. “That’s something we’ve believed in all along. You shouldn’t need to stand there holding your cap in your hand.” 

“It’s already possible to bring in a ban in certain municipalities today,” she continued. “So the question is really whether this should be regulated at a national or a local level. We did not decide at out national congress that it should be regulated at a national level, but when the inquiry publishes its conclusions, we will assess the advantages and disadvantages and decide on whether we will keep our position or change.” 

Where she was critical of the new government was in its failure to discuss how it would increase the budgets for municipalities and regional governments, who she said face being forced to drive through savage cuts in real spending to schools, healthcare and elderly care if they were not prioritised in the coming budget. 

“But that’s such a tiny part of this slottsavtal (“Mansion agreement”), and the government’s policy programme suggests they’ve missed something that should really be in focus for the government,” she said, warning that citizens should be braced for dramatic fall in the quality of welfare in the coming years. 

She said her party would also campaign against the new government’s plans to scrap Sweden’s goal of spending one percent of GDP on aid, and also against the new government’s plans to make it harder to build wind energy projects. 

SHOW COMMENTS