SHARE
COPY LINK

WORLD CUP

‘Africa won the World Cup?’: French players (and Obama) have final word

French players and former US President Barack Obama have hit back at suggestions made around the world that it was Africa rather than France that won the World Cup because of the ethnic origin of many of the players.

'Africa won the World Cup?': French players (and Obama) have final word
Photo: AFP

Ever since France won the World Cup on Sunday evening a row, with racist undertones, has been bubbling over.

It has mainly been occurring outside France with the Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro having his say as well as Croatian footballers and Italian journalists.

Even former US President Barack Obama has waded into the row.

Maduro's comments sum up the views of a minority, perhaps bitter about Les Bleus' victory, who pointed to the ethnic origins of the players in a bid to suggest that the World Cup triumph had nothing to do with France.

“The French team looked like an African team, in fact it was Africa who won,” said Maduro. “France won thanks to African players or the sons of Africans.”

Maduro did congratulate France and called for an end to racism in Europe against African people, but his words about the French team stuck.

It was a theme expressed far and wide and not just in the caves of social media where trolls hang out.

French newspaper Les Echos noted how France's victory had been greeted with a tide of racist comments in Italy that some journalists and newspapers had only helped to fuel.

“A team full of Africans blended with some very good white players played against a team from a country at the centre of three great football schools of thought: Slavic, German and Italian,” wrote Italian Corriere della Sera giving its perception on the differences between France and Croatia.

CLICK HERE to sign up for full access to The Local France (Just €2.49/month).

Even on the eve of the final former Croatian player Igor Stimac said the country's team were up against “the republic of France and the African continent.”

And even the host of The Daily Show in America Trevor Noah tried to joke about the origins of the French team by claiming “Africa won the World Cup” and ended up being accused of racism and poor humour.

Former US president Barack Obama even got involved to rubbish all those suggesting the players were not French.

“Just ask the French football team that just won the World Cup… Not all of those folks looked like Gauls to me. But they're French! They're French,” said Obama during a speech in South Africa to commemorate 100 years since the birth of Nelson Mandela.

US-based French basketball player Evan Fournier also fired off on Twitter.

“Stop it with this “Africa won the world cup for France” nonsense. Is it Africa winning when the USA win Gold medals in the Olympics? he said.

What was perculiar and perhaps positive was that up until that point there was a distinct lack of talk about the origins of the French players in France itself.

While the 1998 World Cup win with a multi-racial team was heralded as a victory for the “Black-Blanc-Beur” (Black, white and Arab) generation and sparked much pondering over the benefits of France being a multi-cultural society, the 2018 win was heralded as a victory for just one colour – les bleus.

“Proud to be blue” were the words emblazoned across the Arc de Triomphe following Sunday's final win.

But eventually the French players – who had remained silent, perhaps bemused by the row, felt compelled to speak out.

The team's players have regularly talked of their pride for playing in multi-racial team that represents a multi-cultural country.

“That's France. There are many origins here. That's what makes France beautiful,” said the team's talisman Paul Pogba, before Sunday's final.

Perhaps the best response to the row was by the French defender Benjamin Mendy, who replied to a tweet by the Sporf website which in a positive attempt to highlight the origins of the players put a flag next to each name in the French squad.

Mendy replied to the Tweet by simply putting a French flag next to the names of each player along with the word “fixed”.

That really should be the last word.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

SPORT

Norway’s football clubs to vote on Qatar World Cup boycott

Will Norwegian football star Erling Braut Haaland stay home or play on what fans have dubbed a "cemetery?" This Sunday, a meeting of Norway's football community will decide whether to boycott next year's World Cup in Qatar.

Norway's football clubs to vote on Qatar World Cup boycott
Norway's forward Erling Haaland (L) and teammates wear jerseys reading "Fair play for migrant workers" before the international friendly football match between Norway and Greece at La Rosaleda stadium in Malaga in preperation for the UEFA European Championships, on June 6, 2021. JORGE GUERRERO / AFP

Under pressure from grassroots activists the Norwegian Football Federation(NFF) has decided to hold an extraordinary congress to decide on whether to pass up football’s showpiece event all together.

The games on the pitches in the Middle Eastern emirate will “unfortunately be like playing on a cemetery,” according to Ole Kristian Sandvik, spokesman of the Norwegian Supporters Alliance (NSA), invoking a commonly used metaphor among opponents of Norway’s participation.

Norway, which has not qualified for a major international competition since Euro 2000, is currently fourth in its World Cup qualifying group behind Turkey, the Netherlands and Montenegro. 

So while qualification seems an uphill task, the result of the vote could have an impact on whether Norway and its young star Haaland — one of the rising stars of world football — continue to play qualifying matches. 

The movement calling for a boycott began north of the Arctic Circle when football club Tromso IL spoke out against turning a blind eye to alleged human rights abuses at the end of February.

“We can no longer sit and watch people die in the name of football,” the first division club proclaimed.

Qatar has faced criticism for its treatment of migrant workers, many of whom are involved in the construction of stadiums and infrastructure for the 2022 World Cup, with campaigners accusing employers of exploitation and forcing labourers to work in dangerous conditions.

Qatari authorities meanwhile insist they have done more than any country in the region to improve worker welfare.

“There is no doubt that this World Cup should never have been awarded to Qatar,” Tom Hogli, a former professional footballer turned public relations officer for Tromso IL, told AFP.

“The conditions there are abominable and many have lost their lives,” he added.

In March, a spokesman for the Qatari organisers put the number of deaths on the construction sites at “three” since 2014, with another 35 having died away from their workplaces, challenging the heavy toll reported by some rights groups.

Push from fans
The Tromso call began gathering pace in Norway, where clubs operate under a democratic structure, and under pressure from fans, many teams now say “nei” (no).

According to Sandvik, the fans feel that the deaths on the World Cup sites would have been avoided “if they had not had to build hotels, railways and stadiums”.

Nearly half of Norwegians, 49 percent, now say they are in favour of a boycott, while only 29 percent are against it, according to a poll published by newspaper VG on Wednesday.

The Nordic country’s national squad has already protested conditions in Qatar, but stopped short of calling for a boycott.

Before recent Norway games, Borussia Dortmund superstar Haaland, captain Martin Odegaard and the rest of the team have worn t-shirts with slogans like “Human rights on and off the pitch.”

Other countries, like Germany, the Netherlands and Denmark have also followed suit.

FIFA, on the other hand, argue that awarding the hosting of the World Cup in Qatar has opened the door to social progress.

“We know there is still work to be done, but we need to recognise the significant progress achieved in a very short time,” FIFA president Gianni Infantino said in May.

‘Few successes’ 
While the executive committee of the NFF have said they regret Qatar being awarded the World Cup, they oppose a boycott.

President Terje Svendsen said he thought it was “not the right tool to improve the human rights situation or the working conditions in Qatar,” when speaking at the federation’s ordinary annual congress in March.

According to the NFF, a boycott could end up costing Norway 205 million Norwegian kroner ($24 million, 20 million euros) in fines and compensation as well as lost revenue.

Feeling the pressure from grassroots campaigns, the NFF referred the matter to an extraordinary congress which on Sunday will bring together the eight members of its executive committee, representatives of 18 districts and of hundreds of professional and amateur clubs.

The discussions will be revolve around the findings of an expert committee which, with the exception of two members representing fans, has also come out against a boycott.

“For a boycott to succeed, you need a critical mass behind it, an opposition that calls for it in the country, the UN to put pressure on the
authorities, the business world, the trade unions and civil society to put pressure on it in the long term,” committee chairman Sven Mollekleiv said in a debate hosted by broadcaster TV2.

“Historically, there are few successes,” he said.

Rather than a boycott, the committee recommended 26 measures to consolidate and further the gains made in Qatar but also to ensure that FIFA doesn’t become complicit in so called “sportswashing” — the polishing of a country’s public image through a major sporting event.

Some initial supporters of a boycott, like Tromso’s Hogli, have since sided with these conclusions, although calls for a complete boycott remain.

SHOW COMMENTS