SHARE
COPY LINK

ELECTION

Shouldn’t EU citizens have right to vote in French presidential election?

Shouldn't citizens from Britain (they haven't left yet) and other EU countries who live and pay taxes in France be given the right to vote in French presidential election? There are reasons why it would make sense.

Shouldn't EU citizens have right to vote in French presidential election?
Photo: AFP

“I pay my taxes in France, so I should have the right to vote here.” It’s a common thought among EU expats living and working all over France from Paris to Provence and from Brittany to Burgundy.

Surely EU citizens (let's include the UK for the sake of argument and for the fact they haven't actually left yet) who lived in France for years should be allowed their say on whether the anti-EU, “French First', Marine Le Pen becomes the next president of France or not?

Or indeed whether the “French Maggie Thatcher” (François Fillon) or the “French Tony Blair” (Emmanuel Macron) become the head of state for that matter.

The current laws allow citizens from EU countries to vote in European and local elections but not national ones.

So Brits, Irish, Germans or Spanish plying their trades in France get a say over who the local mayor is but will have no influence over who will be France’s president nor who will stand in parliament.

Effectively that means they can have a say on whether the local primary school gets some new equipment but not on how much tax they pay, how many hours a week they work or when they can retire.

Granted, EU nationals (who have been here over five years) could go through the arduous process of applying for French nationality if they really wanted the right to vote, but is that really necessary?

Do you really need to become French to have get your say in how the country you call home will work in future?

'Freedom of movement should come with voting rights'

Surely there’s a way it can happen without all the paperwork, if there's a will.

The issue has been the result of campaigns in the past, notably the European Citizens’ Initiative “Let Me Vote” which pushed for EU citizens to get voting rights in national elections.

Philippe Cayla, the head of TV station Euronews and who founded Let Me Vote, told The Local previously “We have talked about EU Citizenship, but what does it mean to be an EU citizen if you live in a different country and you don’t have the same rights as everyone else? EU citizens in each country should be equal.

“You can’t have an open market and encourage freedom of movement without ensuring voting rights,” he added.

But it’s not just about EU citizenship, having the right to vote in the French elections would be invaluable in helping to boost integration and a sense of belonging in their adopted country.

The idea has some political in France support including from Jean-Christophe Lagarde the head of the centre right UDI party who is in favour of EU citizens being able to vote in the national parliamentary elections, but not the presidential one.

He told The Local previously that the current situation “can’t go on”.

“EU nationals in France are considered citizens at a local level, because they have the right to vote but at a regional or national level they are no longer citizens.

'Part time citizens in France'

“So they have a say in how primary schools are run, because that comes under the remit of a local mayor, but once their child goes to a collège or a lycée, these EU nationals have no say in what happens.

“They are only citizens in France from time to time, but it shouldn't work like that.”

Of course it shouldn't just be EU citizens living in France? Why not Americans or Chinese or Brits when the UK does leave the EU? The fact it would need to be reciprocal makes it easier in the EU in theory. But bilateral agreements could be possible.

But it's unlikely to be a popular idea in France where the subject of giving votes to foreigners even in local elections has been a thorny issue for decades now.

Many French people don’t seem to be sympathetic to the idea of paying taxes in a country should mean the right to vote.

And they are right. We can’t just be expected to get off the ferry, get a job and then go straight to the polling booth.

(The French parliament. Shouldn't we have a say on who is elected here?)

They French, probably more than other nationalities in Europe, would like us to have a stronger bond and even affinity with their country rather than just with their tax man before we can vote for the head of state.

Flavien Neuvy a right-wing French mayor, put it like this: “Paying taxes = right to vote? Really?

“This is absurd. Our republic works on the simple principle of a sovereign people. It is the French people who elect their representatives. Granting voting rights to foreigners is to abandon a part of that sovereignty. It is ill advised.”

Abandon sovereignty? Really? Or would extending voting rights simply enhance it while at the same time give EU citizens a greater stake in their new home and help bridge the gap between them and the locals?

Of course it’s unlikely to happen, given that it would be complicated and the move would need to be reciprocal. The French living in London or Berlin also deserve to vote in national elections.

But this is probably an unpopular idea at a time when Europe appears to be becoming more fractured than united.

There are also many foreign citizens living in France who would still prefer to be able to vote in their home country rather than in France.

While some still have that right, many British citizens who have been out of the country for 15 years or more (although the law is set to change) and all Irish expats do not.

Perhaps the only option really is to take French nationality.

But there are other ways it could work. (See link below)

Giving EU citizens right to vote in the French election: Seven ways it could work

Giving EU citizens right to vote in the French election: Seven ways it could work

ELECTION

German Greens’ chancellor candidate Baerbock targeted by fake news

With Germany's Green party leading the polls ahead of September's general elections, the ecologists' would-be successor to Angela Merkel has become increasingly targeted by internet trolls and fake news in recent weeks.

German Greens' chancellor candidate Baerbock targeted by fake news
The Greens chancellor candidate Annalena Baerbock on April 26th. Photo: DPA

From wild claims about CO2-emitting cats and dogs to George Soros photo collages, 40-year-old Annalena Baerbock has been the subject of a dizzying array of fake news, conspiracy theories and online attacks since she was announced as the Greens’ chancellor candidate in mid-April.

The latest polls have the Greens either ahead of or level with Merkel’s ruling conservatives, as the once fringe party further establishes itself as a leading electoral force in Europe’s biggest economy.

Baerbock herself also consistently polls higher than her conservative and centre-left rivals in the race to succeed Merkel, who will leave office after 16 years this autumn.

Yet her popularity has also brought about unwanted attention and a glut of fake news stories aimed at discrediting Baerbock as she bids to become Germany’s first Green chancellor.

READ ALSO:

False claims

Among the false stories circulating about Baerbock is the bizarre claim that she wants to ban household pets in order to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.

Another fake story firmly denied by the party claimed that she defied rules on mask-wearing and social-distancing by embracing colleagues upon her nomination earlier this month.

Baerbock has also been presented as a “model student” of Hungarian billionaire George Soros – a hate figure for the European far-right and anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists – in a mocked-up social media graphic shared among others by a far-right MP.

More serious online attacks include a purported photo of Baerbock which in fact shows a similar-looking naked model.

The Greens’ campaign manager Michael Kellner said that the attempts to discredit Baerbock had “taken on a new dimension”, that “women are targeted more heavily by online attacks than men, and that is also true of our candidate”.

Greens co-leader Annalena Baerbock earlier this month. Photo: DPA

Other false claims about the party include reports of a proposed ban on barbecues, as well as plans to disarm the police and enforce the teaching of the Quran in schools.

While such reports are patently absurd, they are potentially damaging to Baerbock and her party as they bid to spring a surprise victory in September.

“She has a very real chance, but the coming weeks are going to be very important because Baerbock’s public image is still taking shape,” Thorsten Faas, a political scientist at Berlin’s Free University told AFP.

In a bid to fight back against the flood of false information, the party has launched a new “online fire service” to report fake news stories.

READ ALSO: Greens become ‘most popular political party’ in Germany

Russian disinformation

Yet stemming the tide is no easy job, with many of those who peddle disinformation now using private messaging services such as WhatsApp and Telegram rather than public platforms such as Facebook.

The pandemic and ongoing restrictions on public life will also make it harder for the campaign to push through their own narratives at public events.

Miro Dittrich of Germany’s Amadeu-Antonio anti-racism foundation claims that lockdown has “played a role” in the spread of fake news.

“People are isolated from their social environment and are spending a lot more time online,” he said.

Another factor is Russia, which has made Germany a primary target of its efforts to spread disinformation in Europe.

According to the European anti-disinformation platform EUvsDisinfo, Germany has been the target of 700 Russian disinformation cases since 2015, compared to 300 aimed at France and 170 at Italy.

As an outspoken critic of the controversial Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline between Germany and Russia, Baerbock may well become a target of such attacks during the election campaign.

By Mathieu FOULKES

SHOW COMMENTS