SHARE
COPY LINK
OPINION - BREXIT

EUROPEAN UNION

‘The EU must not become Britain’s hostage’

Britain should not be allowed to delay the initiation of its withdrawal from the European Union, argues Swedish newspaper Sydsvenskan.

'The EU must not become Britain's hostage'
David Cameron also comes under fire in the Sydsvenskan editorial. Photo: Matt Dunham/AP/TT

The British Prime Minister David Cameron took a gamble when for party political reasons he announced a referendum, and he lost. Fifty-two percent voted for Britain to leave the EU.

That does not however hinder him from devoting all of his remaining time in office to getting the lengthy process of leaving the union off the ground as soon as possible.

That he announced his resignation – which will come into effect after the Conservative Party congress in October – feels far from satisfactory. Cameron also thinks that it is his successor who should trigger the Lisbon treaty's article 50 – the article which formally, and for the first time ever, initiates a country’s exit from the EU. Much can happen between now and October however, and Cameron would leave a far better political epitaph if he took hold of the Brexit he has triggered.

Personally, and promptly.

Britons’ yes to secession has shocked Europe and the world. With a four percentage point margin (52 to 48) the victory of the Leave campaign can be called short, but not unclear. The initiative of launching a petition to try and urge a second referendum therefore does not convince. The petition starter’s reference to a low voter turnout also doesn’t sound very convincing. The turnout – 72.2 percent – was larger than for the most recent general election.

The situation in British politics is chaotic.

The Leave side’s victory has led to changes at the top of the ruling Conservative Party. The opposition has also been shaken. On Sunday, Jeremy Corbyn attempted to quell a revolt at the top of his Labour Party. Early on Sunday morning he forced Hilary Benn, Labour’s shadow foreign secretary, out the door. Benn has taken a number of shadow ministers with him.

In Scotland, where Remain took a convincing win with 62 percent, there is open discussion about leaving the UK and attempting to stay in the EU. In a BBC interview, the country’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon of the Scottish National Party said that the Edinburgh parliament could veto withdrawal from the European Union.

Ironically, in 2014 the Scots voted to remain in the UK because that was seen as a prerequisite for being able to remain in the EU.

The referendum also had quick repercussions in Brussels. As soon as the result became clear, Britain’s European Commissioner Jonathan Hill announced that he was leaving his post with immediate effect. If a successor is appointed it is unclear whether he or she can – or should – participate in the Commission’s work.

When EU member state leaders meet in Brussels on Tuesday to discuss the implications of Brexit, David Cameron, the real protagonist of the drama, is not welcome. That does not mean that he does not have a responsibility to facilitate the process he has put in motion. Britain has voted for secession, that is a fact and must be respected. To ignore the advisory referendum would further fuel the feeling of mistrust of the elite that has taken hold in Eurosceptic circles around Europe.

That the Brits now seem to want to delay the effects however, that Cameron himself does not want to trigger the withdrawal clause, creates a risk of them taking the EU hostage. Great Britain continues to formally be a member, but acts as if the handbrake has been taken off. The European Union cannot tolerate that. It has important things on its plate, and must now deal with them, not waste energy on recalcitrant Brits on their way out.

Much can and will happen politically between now and the Conservative Party conference in October. That Cameron has chosen to remain until then – without taking hold of the issue that has caused his resignation – makes the bad even worse. The result of the referendum has shaken the EU at its core, and also threatens to rupture the United Kingdom.

That is no impressive legacy. It would have looked better if Cameron had dealt with his party without dragging the EU into it. The least he can do now is to take care of his worries at home and not turn them into the EU’s problem.

This is a translation of an editorial written by Swedish newspaper Sydsvenskan

TRAVEL NEWS

EES: Could the launch of Europe’s new border system be delayed again?

After being postponed several times already Europe's new biometric Entry/Exit border system (EES) is set to be rolled out in October, but with fears of lengthy queues, problems with a new app and demands for more time, could it be postponed again?

EES: Could the launch of Europe's new border system be delayed again?

Could the entry into operation of the EU entry/exit system (EES), the new biometric passport checks for non-EU citizens at the Schengen area’s external borders, be delayed yet again?

Originally planned for May 2022, EES has already been postponed many times.

The current launch date, set for October 2024, was chosen to avoid periods of peak traffic and France in particular had requested to avoid it being launched until after the Paris Olympics this summer.

When asked to confirm the October start date this week a spokesperson for the EU’s Commission told The Local that the “roadmap” for the EES IT system foresees it will be ready for Autumn 2024. But the actual start date, in other words, the day when passengers will have to register, would be confirmed nearer the time.

The spokesperson said: “The exact date will be determined by the European Commission and announced on the EES official website well in time for the start of operations.”

READ ALSO: Your key questions answered about Europe’s new EES passport checks

But the reasons are adding up to suggest an October start date is optimistic, perhaps even unlikely.

In the annual report on the ‘State of Schengen’ published last week, the European Commission spelt out that severe challenges remain if member states are to be ready on time.

“In 2023, efforts to ensure the entry into operation of the Entry-Exit System in the autumn of 2024 were accelerated… While important progress has been made across the Schengen area, some Member States are still falling behind, notably regarding the effective equipment of border crossing points. The Commission calls on all Member States to urgently accelerate preparations to ensure the timely implementation of the system…”

A map in the report shows that preparation is still “in progress” in 13 Schengen area countries, including Germany, Norway and Switzerland. “Outstanding issues” still impact Portugal, Malta and Bulgaria.

The state of play for the preparations for EES across EU and Schengen states. Image: European Commission.

There are also reports that EU heavyweight Germany is trying to persuade Brussels to delay.

Matthias Monroy, editor of the German civil rights journal Bürgerrechte & Polizei/CILIP claimed on his website that “the German government is lobbying in Brussels to postpone the date once again, as otherwise the German tests of the EES cannot be completed in full. Other EU countries are also behind schedule, with only eight of them having reported successful integration.”

Even on a French government website it talks of EES being rolled out some time “between the end of 2024 and 2025” rather than stating October 2024.

And according to recent media reports, French airports have been advised to be ready for November 6th, rather than October. 

READ ALSO: EES and Etias – what are the big upcoming travel changes in Europe?

A planned EU app, believed to be essential to the smooth operation of EES because it would allow non-EU visitors to register in advance of travel will not be ready, Gwendoline Cazenave, Managing Director of Eurostar International, the company operating train services via the Channel Tunnel, has told the BBC. The EU however insists the app does not need to be up and running before EES is introduced.

In the UK, which will be heavily impacted by EES due to the fact it is no longer in the EU and so British travellers are no longer EU citizens, the House of Commons European scrutiny committee is conducting an inquiry on the potential disruption the introduction of the EES will cause at the border.

Several respondents have recently raised the alarm about the possible delays the system could cause, especially at the UK-France border, which is used by millions of passengers each year who head to France and other countries across Europe.

Ashford Borough Council in Kent has warned of the possibility of more than 14 hours queues to reach the Port of Dover, which has already been struggling increased checked after Brexit.

The BBC reported that back in March, a P&O Ferries director said the IT system should be delayed again.

Airlines have also complained about the fact pre-travel EES requirements would make last minute bookings impossible.

The Union des Aéroports Français (UAF), which represents airports in France, has simply said more time is needed.

In other words, it would be little surprise if the roll out was delayed again beyond October 2024.

But the Commission spokesperson told The Local that “the timeline for the entry into operation of the EES took into account all the necessary activities to be performed by all relevant stakeholders to ensure a timely entry into operation. 

“The Commission is working very closely with eu-Lisa [the EU agency in charge of the IT system], the Member States and carriers to ensure that everything is ready for the timely and successful launch of the Entry Exit System.

“The roadmap for the delivery of the new IT architecture foresees that the Entry/Exit system will be ready to enter into operation in Autumn 2024.”

New digital border

The EES is a digital system to register travellers from non-EU countries when they cross a border in or out of the Schengen area, the travel-free area. It will be deployed in 29 countries across Europe including 25 EU states plus Norway, Switzerland, Iceland and Liechtenstein. Ireland and Cyprus are the only EU members who won’t apply the EES system.

It doesn’t apply to non-EU nationals who are legally resident in an EU/Schengen area country or those with dual nationality of an EU /Schengen county. The system was designed to increase security and to ensure that non-EU nationals visiting the Schengen area short-term do not stay more than 90 days in any 180-day period.

Instead of having the passport stamped, travellers will have to scan it at self-service kiosks before crossing the border. However, fingerprints and a photo will have to be registered in front of a guard at the first crossing and there are huge concerns the extra time needed could generate long queues in the UK, where there are juxtaposed border checks with the EU.

Preparations are ongoing throughout Europe and some countries have made good progress.

In France, Getlink, the operator of the Channel Tunnel, has recently reported that new EES infrastructure is finished at its French terminal of Coquelles, which will allow travellers to register their biometric data while travelling.

Eurostar is also installing 49 kiosks in stations for the registration of passengers. But the Union des Aéroports Français (UAF), which represents airports in France, said more time is needed.

Exempted

Meanwhile, the Polish government has urged UK citizens who are beneficiaries of the EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement to get a residence permit “in the context of EES/ETIAS”, even though there was not such an obligation to stay legally in Poland post-Brexit.

“Having such a document is beneficial as it will exempt from future Entry/Exit System (EES) registration when crossing external borders and from the need to obtain an ETIAS travel permit in relation to short-term travel to EU/Schengen countries,” the government page says.

This article as published in collaboration with Europe Street news.

SHOW COMMENTS