SHARE
COPY LINK

NATIONALITY

Terrorism: France ‘to scrap plan to strip citizenships’

The French president appears to have backtracked on a flagship plan to strip dual nationals convicted of terrorism of their French citizenship even if they are born in France- a move announced in the aftermath of the November terror attacks.

Terrorism: France 'to scrap plan to strip citizenships'
Photo: AFP

It appears French president François Hollande’s declaration made just three days after terrorists killed 130 people in Paris was a spur of the moment announcement made to appeal to an angry public.

The move to strip dual nationals of their French citizenship was set to be part of a series of measures announced to parliament that would have resulted in a change of the constitution.

But on Tuesday it emerged that the government has decided to drop the move because it was proving a divisive measure, according to reports.

Any constitutional change requires a two-thirds majority in parliament.

But the idea of removing citizenship in cases where an individual, even when born in France, is found guilty of acts that “constitute an attack on the fundamental interests of the nation or… an act of terrorism” is not guaranteed to win enough support.

Several politicians on the left have spoken out against the idea in recent days and even French PM Manuel Valls said “stripping someone’s nationality is not a weapon against terrorism”.

Many on the left criticised the move for being purely symbolic.

Former minister Cecile Duflot saying the measure was “an ideological gift to the National Front”, who along with the right had been demanding France change the law to allow passports to be taken from those who “break from the values of the Republic.”

Now it appears the policy will not make the final cut.

“The Elysée has realised that it will create a schism not just in the Socialist Party but throughout the whole of the left,” said MP Benoit Hamon of the decision to drop the plan.

France already has laws that allow authorities to strip citizenship from those convicted of terrorism offences if they have become naturalized French in the preceding 15 years, but not for those born here..

The government has not been afraid to use them.

In October, Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve requested that five “terrorists” be stripped of their
nationality.

And in September a Moroccan-born jihadist was stripped of his French nationality and sent back to his country of birth because he posed a serious threat to national security according to the government.

So without the plan to strip citizenship from those born in France the controversial reform of France’s constitution will only feature the inclusion of new rules on states of emergency.

Hollande announced a state of emergency immediately after the terror attacks.

It was due to last for 12 days but MPs voted unanimously to extend it.

To date, the measure — which gives police the power to carry out raid sand arrests without judicial oversight — has not not featured in the constitution – only in a separate law that has rarely been used.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

RACISM

Why a row has broken out over ‘race’ in Germany’s constitution

A row has broken out in Germany over the term "race" in the country's constitution as the George Floyd killing in US police custody spills over into national politics.

Why a row has broken out over 'race' in Germany's constitution
Photo: DPA

Paragraph three in Germany's Basic Law (Grundgesetz) states that “no person shall be favoured or disfavoured because of sex, parentage, race, language, homeland and origin, faith or religious or political opinions.”

But the Green party this week took aim at the word “race” pushing for a change to the constitution in place since 1949 as a bulwark against dictatorships like the Nazi regime which championed racist politics more than seven decades ago.

“There are no 'races'. There are human beings,” said Green party co-leader Robert Habeck, noting that a “strong sign” against racism would be to remove the term from the document.

Backing the call, Germany's commissioner for combatting anti-Semitism Felix Klein said: “The term race is a social construct that is designed to devalue and to discriminate against people.”

The far-left Linke party and the business-friendly FDP have all lined up behind the push, with some critics of the term calling for it to be replaced with words like “ethnic origin”.

Even Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservatives have broken a silence on the subject to voice openness to look at the issue.

READ ALSO: Grundgesetz: What does Germany's Basic Law really mean?

'Racial mania'

Drawn up after World War II, Germany's Basic Law has been amended 62 times, including to take into account European integration and German reunification.

But unchanging among its key tenets are the guarantees of equality before the law.

Green co-leader Robert Habeck said the term 'race' should be removed from Germany's Grundgesetz. Photo: DPA

With the debate heating up, the justice ministry has defended the place for the term in the constitution, noting that it “clearly makes no references to the existence of different human races nor of the acceptance of this sense”.

The authors of the constitution had in fact sought to “set a clear sign against racial mania” championed by the Nazis, according to the ministry.

Adolf Hitler's regime championed his claims on racial “purity” and purported the superiority of the “Germanic race” — which he called the Aryan “master race”.

In the extreme push for this, the regime branded the Jews a dangerous “race”, putting in place an extermination programme that murdered six million Jews.

The far-right AfD has also spoken out against an amendment of the constitution.

READ ALSO: Germany 'not doing enough to fight racism' as country sees rise in reported discrimination cases

“If there are races, then there should not be objections to the current version of the Basic Law, because then it rightly fits in it. If, on the other hand, there are no races, then there would be no racism,” argued deputy spokesman for the party Stephan Brandner in an interview with the RND newspaper group.

With the row heating up, Interior Minister Horst Seehofer said he “won't stand in the way” of opening a discussion on amending the wording.

It is “much more important for us to wipe out racism”, he added.

Conservative daily Die Welt warned against hypocrisy in the debate.

“Some Germans are now so evolved that they find the word 'race' unbearable… but they won't send their children to schools with many Arabs and Turks, but to places where they find their same ethnic groups.

“And that is exactly what needs to change if one takes the Basic Law seriously, rather than abusing this noble document … for linguistic self-righteousness.”

By Hui Min Neo

SHOW COMMENTS