SHARE
COPY LINK

SYNGENTA

Monsanto drops bid to buy Swiss rival Syngenta

US seed giant Monsanto dropped its campaign to acquire Syngenta on Wednesday, ending hopes to add a Swiss pesticides giant it had seen as key to expanding its global reach.

Monsanto drops bid to buy Swiss rival Syngenta
Photo: AFP

Monsanto said it had no choice but to pull the plug on the proposed deal after Syngenta refused to entertain repeated and improved offers.
   
The most recent bid, proposed on August 18th, worth about $46 billion at the time, would have amounted to 470 francs per share overall, up from the original April bid of 449 francs per share, Monsanto said.
   
“Without a basis for constructive engagement from Syngenta, Monsanto will continue to focus on its growth opportunities built on its existing core business to deliver the next wave of transformational solutions for agriculture,” Monsanto said.
   
Syngenta confirmed that it had rejected Monsanto's latest offer, which “significantly undervalued the company and was fraught with execution risk.”
   
“Our board is confident that Syngenta's long-term prospects remain very attractive,” said Syngenta chairman Michel Demare.
   
Monsanto had argued that combining the two companies would have eliminated
inefficiencies in research, sped product introductions and generally boosted the ability of farmers to meet growing global food demand.
   
Monsanto had envisioned shifting the headquarters from the midwestern city of St Louis, Missouri, to Britain, a demonstration that “our merger will create a new global enterprise focused on future growth across all geographies,” Monsanto chief executive Hugh Grant said in an April 18th letter to Syngenta executives.
   
“The combination of our companies would redefine the future of agriculture,” Grant had said.
   
But Syngenta has repeatedly rejected the Monsanto bids as inadequate, in part because of worries the deal would be blocked on antitrust grounds.
   
Monsanto responded by raising the breakup fee to $3 billion in the August bid, from the previous offer of $2 billion. In the August bid, Monsanto also increased the cash share of the proposal to about 52 percent from the original proportion of 45 percent.
   
But Syngenta said Wednesday that “recent market volatility” had “highlighted the significant risk” for Syngenta from the deal.
   
The Monsanto offer priced Syngenta at 433 francs per share as of August 25th, Syngenta said.  Monsanto shares have dropped 13 percent between August 18th and 25th amid global market turmoil.
   
Syngenta said Monsanto had also failed to provide “sufficient clarity” on a number of concerns, including regulatory risk, the tax benefits of shifting from the US to Britain and Monsanto's estimates of the financial benefits of the deal.
   
“We engaged with Monsanto in good faith and highlighted those key issues which required more concrete information in order to continue a dialogue. We take note of Monsanto's decision,” Demare said.
   
Syngenta executives in an earlier correspondence also cited the “reputational risks” of combining with the US heavyweight, which is a leader in genetically modified seeds.
   
In midday trade, US-listed Syngenta shares plunged 11.3 percent to $66.26, while Monsanto jumped 7.5 percent to $96.13.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

SYNGENTA

Swiss NGO links Syngenta pesticide to Indian farmer deaths

The Swiss NGO Public Eye called on Tuesday for an export ban on the pesticide Polo, produced by agriculture giant Syngenta, implicating it in the death of 20 Indian farmers last year.

Swiss NGO links Syngenta pesticide to Indian farmer deaths
A man outside Sygenta HQ in Basel in 2017. File photo: AFP

Syngenta, bought by ChemChina for $43 billion in 2017 in China's largest ever foreign takeover, has rejected the allegations by Public Eye.

“There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that Syngenta's product Polo was at all responsible for the incidents that have occurred,” the company said in a statement. 

Last September, officials in the western Indian state of Maharashtra reported that 20 farmers had died and hundreds of others were in hospital after inhaling poisonous pesticides while spraying crops.

After visiting the affected Yavatmal region and interviewing farmers and their relatives, Public Eye said there was strong evidence that Polo — specifically its active agent diafenthiuron — was responsible for the 
poisoning. 

Public Eye noted that while the evidence was not conclusive, the spraying of Polo was a common link among those who died or fell sick. 

The NGO also said farmers in Yavatmal likely inhaled excessive amounts of the insecticide last year as cotton plants grew higher than normal, forcing them to spray closer to their mouths. 

Officials in Maharashtra reportedly opened a criminal investigation targeting Syngenta over the deaths, but the status of the probe is not known. 

The European Union banned diafenthiuron in 2002. 

The Swiss government pulled it from the market in 2009 “for reasons of health or environmental protection”, according to official documents. 

Syngenta branded Public Eye's allegations “salacious and incorrect”.

In response to the spate of deaths and illnesses, the company said it “conducted stewardship programs in the district and adjoining regions, conducted doctor training programs and established mobile health clinics to 
support treatment of farmers who may have been affected.”

Syngenta noted that Polo “has been successfully and safely used by Indian farmers across the country for the last 14 years,” and that diafenthiuron is registered in 25 countries worldwide. 

Export ban?

While diafenthiuron cannot be used in Switzerland, it is produced in Monthey, in the Valais canton. 

Under current Swiss law, Syngenta has to inform the federal government about its diafenthiuron exports, including quantities and destination countries. 

Bern is then responsible for informing the recipient countries, so they are aware of the risks. 

Public Eye says this does not go far enough and that companies based in Switzerland should be barred from exporting products deemed unsafe for Swiss people. 

“The Swiss authorities must put an end to this policy of double standards,” the NGO said. 

Swiss voters will this Sunday vote in two referendums aimed at ensuring foodstuffs produced in Switzerland are sustainable, healthy and fairly-produced.

It urged backing for a motion introduced by federal lawmaker Lisa Mazzone calling for the prohibition of “the export of pesticides whose use has been banned in Switzerland due to their effects on human health or the environment.”