SHARE
COPY LINK

OIL

Italy’s Eni inks $6 billion oil deal with Ghana

Ghana on Monday accepted a bid from Italian oil major Eni to develop its offshore oil and gas resources, part of an effort to boost the west African nation's nascent energy sector, officials said.

Italy's Eni inks $6 billion oil deal with Ghana
Eni has signed a $6 billion oil deal in Ghana. Luca Mascaro

"The $6 billion…(deal) is expected to start commercial production of oil and gas by mid-2017 to augment the country's current production capacity," a statement from the Ministry of Energy and Petroleum resources said.

The accord pertains specifically to the offshore field known as Cape Three Points and key portions of the deal must still be approved by parliament.

Ghana, which began commercial oil production in late 2010 in its Jubilee field, has so far struggled to hit its production targets and has faced challenges in attracting foreign investment to fully develop its oil and gas resources.

Energy and Petroleum Minister Emmanuel Armah Kofi Buah conceded that "investment risk (was) a major hurdle in the negotiation".

The country currently produces around 100,000 barrels per day (bpd) and had hoped to be at a far higher production level by the end of 2014.

Ghanaians still face regular power cuts, especially outside the capital Accra, and the country's much-vaunted economic success story has been slightly tarnished by difficulties in containing inflation and a failure to control deficits.

The energy ministry described gas production as a key component of the Eni deal, promising that it would boost power supply.

"This project promises to deliver up to 170 million cubic feet of gas per day for the next two years and put Ghana on its way to a future where one of the critical constraints to power generation (cheaper fuel) will be addressed," the statement said.

Ghana's oil and gas reserves are tiny compared with nearby Nigeria, Africa's largest producer, which churns out roughly two million barrels of crude per day.

The country had attracted significant international interest in the early years following the discovery of oil, as many saw it as a rare example of stability in an often turbulent region.

Ghana, a major exporter of gold and cocoa, has conducted six democratic elections since the end of military rule in 1992, with power changing hands between the two main parties.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

OIL

NGOs take Norway to European Court over Arctic oil exploration

Two NGOs and six young climate activists have decided to take Norway to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) to demand the cancellation of oil permits in the Arctic, Greenpeace announced on Tuesday.

NGOs take Norway to European Court over Arctic oil exploration
Northern Norway. Photo by Vidar Nordli-Mathisen on Unsplash.

It’s the latest turn in a legal tussle between environmental organisations Greenpeace and Young Friends of the Earth Norway on one side and the Norwegian state on the other.

The organisations are demanding the government cancel 10 oil exploration licenses in the Barents Sea awarded in 2016, arguing it was unconstitutional.

Referring to the Paris Agreement, which seeks to limit global warming to less than two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, the organisations claim that the oil licenses violated article 112 of Norway’s constitution, guaranteeing everyone the right to a healthy environment.”

The six activists, alongside Greenpeace Nordic and Young Friends of the Earth Norway, hope that the European Court of Human Rights will hear their case and find that Norway’s oil expansion is in breach of human rights,” Greenpeace said in a statement.

In December, Norway’s Supreme Court rejected the claim brought by the organisations, their third successive legal defeat.

READ MORE: Norway sees oil in its future despite IEA’s warnings 

While most of the judges on the court agreed that article 112 could be invoked if the state failed to meet its climate and environmental obligations– they did not think it was applicable in this case.

The court also held that the granting of oil permits was not contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights, in part because they did not represent “a real and immediate risk” to life and physical integrity.

“The young activists and the environmental organisations argue that this judgment was flawed, as it discounted the significance of their environmental constitutional rights and did not take into account an accurate assessment of the consequences of climate change for the coming generations,” Greenpeace said.

On Friday, the Norwegian government unveiled a white paper on the country’s energy future, which still includes oil exploration despite a warning from the International Energy Agency (IEA).

The IEA recently warned that all future fossil fuel projects must be scrapped if the world is to reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.

The Norwegian case is an example of a global trend in which climate activists are increasingly turning to courts to pursue their agenda.

SHOW COMMENTS