SHARE
COPY LINK

CONCHITA

Tabloid likens Conchita Wurst to circus freak

Norway's leading tabloid newspaper has been accused of "prehistoric prejudice" after an editorial in Monday's paper argued that now a "bearded lady" has won Eurovision, future contests may as well feature "a giant ape" or "a singing camel".

Tabloid likens Conchita Wurst to circus freak
Conchita Wurst at the winner's press conference. Photo: Albin Olsson
The two-line leader, entitled Circus Eurovision, was signed by the newspaper's editor Torry Pedersen. 
 
"The bearded lady won the Eurovision Song Contest," it read. "Challengers next year are a giant monkey from Borneo and a singing camel." 
 
Norway's Anti-Discrimination Ombudsman Sunniva Ørstavik  was quick to condemn VG's stance on Monday morning.
 
"Let VG go to the circus with their prehistoric prejudices," she wrote on Twitter. "The rest of us, along with Eurovision's winner, are saying: 'We are unstoppable'". 
 
Bård Nylund, from the National Association for lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgender people, attacked the editorial as  "incredibly shameful".
 
By the afternoon VG's political editor Hanne Skartveit came out to defend the text, arguing that rather than confirming old-fashioned prejudices, the editorial had been intended to lampoon them. 
 
"The editorial was meant to criticize prejudice by highlighting our not very proud past when you exhibited people who were different at the circus. When it creates so much fuss for a transgender person to take part in Eurovision, it shows that these prejudices are still alive," she said.
 
But she conceded that the editorial had been badly judged. 
 
"We realize that many people are interpreting this completely differently from the way it was intended. We have to criticize ourselves and admit that we were wide of the mark."

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

COURT

Bangers and cash: Sausage makers fight ‘cartel’ fine in Düsseldorf court

Sausage makers in Germany head to court on Tuesday to fight back against a record anti-trust fine for years of alleged price fixing in a sizzling scandal involving the nation's favourite food.

Bangers and cash: Sausage makers fight 'cartel' fine in Düsseldorf court
Meat products at a butcher in Bonn. Photo: DPA.

The Federal Cartel Office slapped a €338 million fine on a string of German sausage producers in 2014, accusing them of colluding for decades to squeeze higher prices out of meat lovers.

But the powerful industry hit back with many of the accused exploiting a legal loophole to escape the penalty, leaving just a small group of companies on the hook for a fraction of the bill.

Of the 22 firms and 33 individuals initially fined – including big name brands Herta and Böklunder – just four sausage producers will appear in the Düsseldorf regional court to contest their share of the punishment – some €22.6 million.

They are Heidemark Maesterkreis, Wiesenhof, Franz Wiltmann and Rügenwalder Mühle as well as five company officials.

They deny accusations of belonging to a so-called “sausage cartel” and refuse to pay up.

Eleven other firms have accepted penalties to the tune of some €70 million.

But the remaining companies made use of a legal sleight of hand and simply restructured to make nearly €240 million of the total bill disappear.

Under the loophole – dubbed the “sausage gap” – parent companies could not be held liable for the fines of a subsidiary if that subsidiary ceased to exist.

The legal trickery ended earlier this year with a change in German competition law.

Wolfgang Ingold, the chief executive of Franz Wiltmann, told industry publication Lebensmittel Zeitung he had been advised to employ the same tactic.

“But we have nothing to hide and we want to see that confirmed by a court,” he was quoted as saying.

Wurst-case scenario

The legal action is not without risks.

In a worst-case scenario, the court could impose an even heftier fine if it believes the accused have been telling porkies.

A verdict is not expected until May at the earliest.

The “sausage cartel” claims stunned Germans when they first came to light in a country known for its fondness of bratwurst.

Although consumption has fallen slightly in recent years, Germans still eat on average 60 kilos of meat annually, with sausages and processed meats making up around half that figure – equivalent to a hot dog a day.

The cartel was nicknamed the “Atlantic group” after the Hamburg hotel where the first meeting was held to discuss pricing in the early 1980s, according to the FCO anti-trust watchdog.

Acting on an anonymous tip-off, the FCO found that the companies kept in regular touch and colluded to force German food retailers to pay higher prices for their pork and poultry products.

The “wurst” scandal capped a record year for the FCO, coming hot on the heels of €280 million fine imposed on three large sugar producers for anti-competitive behaviour.

Also in 2014, more than 10 breweries were fined over €300 million for fixing beer prices.

The office showed its teeth again on Monday, when it handed a €13 million fine to tugboat operators Fairplay, Bugsier and Petersen & Alpers for conspiring to divvy up assignments at German ports.

A fourth colluding company managed to escape punishment by turning in the others.