SHARE
COPY LINK

REFERENDUM

‘UK exit from EU would be disaster for Gibraltar’

The chief minister of Gibraltar has told top UK officials a possible UK exit from the European Union could see the diminutive territory disappear "economically from the map".

'UK exit from EU would be disaster for Gibraltar'
A family pose as they celebrate Gibraltar's National Day in Gibraltar on September 10, 2013. File photo: Marcos Moreno/AFP

Gibraltar Chief Minister Fabian Picardo made the comments to visiting delegates from the UK Foreign Affairs Committee of the House of Commons on Wednesday.

"If we had to apply our minds to an economic model that might enable us to survive UK exit from the European Union, it might be possible to design something where a lot of belt tightening might mean that we might not actually disappear economically from the map," said Picardo after the meeting.

"The snapshot is that it would be a disaster," he was quoted as saying in the Gibraltar Chronicle.

The chief minister also stressed it was key that Gibraltar was included in any legislation concerning a possible UK referendum on an exit from the EU, but admitted votes from the territory wouldn't carry much weight. 

During the meeting, The Rock's top politician also took aim at London for not paying enough attention to the concerns of the tiny UK-held territory, according to the UK's Telegraph newspaper.

Tensions between London and Madrid have been high since mid-2013 when Gibraltar placed a number of blocks in coastal waters to create an artificial reef, causing conflict with Spanish fisherman.

Spain fought back by stepping up border controls, slowing traffic at its border with Gibraltar. 

But while Picardo on Wednesday lauded the UK's "very robust" attempts to address this problem, he said not enough had "happened to deter Spain’s activity".

"Spain cannot get away with thinking that she can punish and damage Gibraltar at her whim and still say that the relationship with the United Kingdom is excellent," the Telegraph had Picardo saying.

Britain has held Gibraltar since 1713 but Spain wants it returned and refuses to recognize British sovereignty over the waters off the land known as "the Rock".

Don't miss stories about Spain, join The Local on Facebook and Twitter.  

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

REFERENDUM

Swiss decision to purchase US fighter jets could force second referendum

Switzerland's decision to purchase US-made fighter jets could be put to a referendum,

Swiss decision to purchase US fighter jets could force second referendum
Swiss fighter jets. Photo: JOE KLAMAR / AFP

Switzerland’s government on Wednesday backed the purchase of 36 F-35A fighter jets from Lockheed Martin to replace its fleet and five Patriot air defence units from fellow US manufacturer Raytheon.

Switzerland’s current air defence equipment will reach the end of its service life in 2030 and has been undergoing a long and hotly-contested search for replacements.

“The Federal Council is confident that these two systems are the most suitable for protecting the Swiss population from air threats in the future,” the government said in a statement.

‘No Trump fighter jets’: Swiss don’t want to buy American planes

The decision will now be put to the Swiss parliament — and also risks being challenged at the ballot box, with left-wingers and an anti-militarist group looking to garner enough signatures to trigger a public vote.

The F-35A was chosen ahead of the Airbus Eurofighter; the F/A-18 Super Hornet by Boeing; and French firm Dassault’s Rafale.

For the ground-based air defence (GBAD) system, Patriot was selected ahead of SAMP/T by France’s Eurosam.

“An evaluation has revealed that these two systems offer the highest overall benefit at the lowest overall cost,” the government statement said. Switzerland is famously neutral. However, its long-standing position is one of armed neutrality and the landlocked European country has mandatory conscription for men.

“A fleet of 36 aircraft would be large enough to cover Switzerland’s airspace protection needs over the longer term in a prolonged situation of heightened tensions,” the government said.

“The air force must be able to ensure that Swiss airspace cannot be used by foreign parties in a military conflict.” 

Long path to decision 

Switzerland began to seek replacements for its ageing fleet of fighter jets more than a decade ago, but the issue has become caught up in a political battle in the wealthy Alpine nation.

The Swiss government has long argued for the need to quickly replace its 30 or so F/A-18 Hornets, which will reach the end of their lifespan in 2030, and the F-5 Tigers, which have been in service for four decades and are not equipped for night flights.

In 2014, the country looked set to purchase 22 Gripen E fighter jets from Swedish group Saab, only to see the public vote against releasing the funds needed to go forward with the multi-billion-dollar deal.

Bern launched a new selection process four years later, and a referendum last year to release six billion Swiss francs ($6.5 billion) for the purchase of the fighters of the government’s choice squeezed through with 50.1 percent of voters in favour.

During the referendum campaign, the government warned that without a swift replacement for its fleet, “Switzerland will no longer be in a position to protect and even less defend its airspace by 2030”.

Currently, the fleet does not have the capacity to support ground troops for reconnaissance missions or to intervene against ground targets.

Meanwhile Switzerland’s current GBAD system is also old and lacks the capacity to meet the widening spectrum of modern threats.

The military currently relies on a range of Rapier and Stinger short-range missiles that have been in service since 1963.

SHOW COMMENTS