SHARE
COPY LINK

UZBEKISTAN

UN watchdog seeks end to torture in Uzbekistan

Uzbekistan must halt its routine use of torture and cease reprisals against human rights campaigners who expose state abuses, United Nations monitors said Friday.

In a hard-hitting report on Uzbekistan's rights record, the UN Committee Against Torture criticised the former Soviet republic for brushing off widespread human rights violations.

"When it comes to the practice of torture, Uzbekistan is one of the countries where torture occurs systematically," said committee member George Tugushi.

"And it's quite unusual when you have a country and you have numerous, credible reports of some serious, systemic issues when it comes to torture and other human rights issues, and you see that somehow the state party is not willing to admit any of those problems," said Tugushi, who is also the human rights ombudsman for Georgia.

Uzbek President Islam Karimov, 75, has ruled the energy-rich Central Asian state since 1989 and the collapse of the Soviet Union.

His regime has been labelled by international rights campaigners as one of the most repressive on the planet.

Quoting from the report on Uzbekistan's respect for international anti-torture rules, Felice Gaer, deputy head of the committee, said the strength of the language was "quite unusual".

"The committee is concerned about numerous, ongoing and consistent allegations that torture and ill-treatment are routinely used by law enforcement, investigative, and prison officials," Gaer, a US human rights expert, told reporters in Geneva.

"You get a pretty clear sense that this is pervasive," she added.

The report demanded "prompt, impartial and effective investigations into all allegations of tortue and ill-treatment and prosecute and punish all those responsible".

It also called for a "zero-tolerance approach to the continuing problem of torture, and to the practice of impunity", and said top officials should "publicly and unambiguously condemn torture".

The committee said Uzbekistan had "limited and obstructed" any independent probes into the crushing of protests in May 2005 in the city of Andijan, which the government said left 187 people dead but which campaigners said cost at least 700 lives.

Uzbekistan's record was reviewed by the anti-torture committee as part of the regular scrutiny of UN member states by the panel of independent experts.

The situation has worsened since Uzbekistan was last in the committee's spotlight in 2007, Gaer said.

She noted that a string of Uzbek activists who tried to expose abuses had faced regime reprisals.

"They've been subjected to torture for trying to report about torture. What we've seen has been a crackdown across the board," she said.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

TELENOR

Ex-Telenor CEO risks US corruption charges

Former Telenor chief executive Jon Fredrik Baksaas risks criminal charges in the US and elsewhere if Russian mobile firm Vimpelcom is found guilty of corruption, Norways NRK has reported.

Ex-Telenor CEO risks US corruption charges
Jon Fredrik Baksaas presents his last set of Telenor results in July. Photo: Torstein Boe / NTB scanpix
According to Professor Beate Sjåfjell, a law professor at the University of Oslo, Baksaas’s three years on board of Vimpelcom between December 2011 and December 2014 mean he could be held partly responsible if Vimpelcom is proven to have given bribes in Uzbekistan. 
 
“The board of a company has the ultimate responsibility for ensuring that it is operated lawfully,” Sjåfjell told Norwegian state broadcaster NRK. “As a result, Baksaas and the other directors of Vimpelcom could risk a criminal prosecution.” 
 
Vimpelcom, in which Telenor owns a 33 percent stake, is being investigated by American and Dutch authorities for paying bribes to set up its Beeline phone company in Uzbekistan. 
 
Sjåfjell argued that even without evidence showing Baksaas was  involved in or even aware of illegal payments, the well-publicized corruption issues in Uzbekistan could leave him vulnerable to charges of negligence. 
 
“Uzbekistan is so high on the list of world’s most corrupt countries that anyone at all familiar with anyone aware that Vimpelcom wanted to establish themselves there must have realized that they had a special responsibility to check whether the investment took place in a correct manner,” Sjåfjell said. 
 
Birthe Eriksen, an expert on corruption at the Norwegian School of Economics (NHH), said that US authorities were increasingly seeking to hold the board members of companies responsible for violations of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. 
 
Her colleague Tina Søreide said that executives could be charged in the US, even without any proof of direct personal involvement 
 
“Board members can be held accountable for the failure of systems, even if it cannot be proven that they have requested or accepted that the company become involved in corrupt practices,” she said. 
 
“There is evidence that board members play an important role in preventing corruption, and whistle-blowers are encouraged to contact the board if they have information about corruption,” she added. 
 
“Through making directors personally responsible, the justice system aims to reduce the willingness of board members to remain passive when they receive information about corruption.” 
 
According to Norway's Klasskampen newspaper the law firm hired by Telenor to “leave no stone unturned” in its investigation of how Telenor handled the Vimpelcom case will not touch on what information the Telenor directors on Vimpelcom's board were given. 
 
“When I talk about an investigation of the Telenor system, I mean it internally within Telenor,” the company's new chief executive Sigve Brekke told the newspaper. “We have no record of what has happened on Vimpelcom's board.”