SHARE
COPY LINK
WORLD CUP

RIBERY

France end goal drought to beat Belarus

The goal-drought is finally over. After five matches without scoring France finally found the net on Tuesday, when they came from behind to beat Belarus 4-2 in a their World Cup qualifier. France are now level with Spain at the the top of the group.

France end goal drought to beat Belarus
Franck Ribery scores a penalty for France against Belarus on Tuesday. Photo:Franck Fife/AFP

Franck Ribery netted a brace as France twice came from behind to win Tuesday's World Cup qualifier in Belarus 4-2, ending a run of five games without a goal for Didier Deschamps's side.

Despite setting a new national record for the longest goalscoring drought, France came alive in the second half to record their first win in six matches and draw level with Spain at the top of Group I, albeit having played a game more than the world champions.

A mistake from France goalkeeper Hugo Lloris had seen Egor Filipenko head Belarus in front on 32 minutes before Ribery responded with a penalty just after half-time.

More poor goalkeeping from Lloris allowed the hosts to move back in front through Timofei Kalachev, but a second Ribery strike plus goals from Samir Nasri and Paul Pogba steered France to a much-needed victory.

"We are very happy to have had a second half as good as that and to have scored four goals because it has been a long time since we scored," said Ribery, who had been an injury concern prior to the game.

"Patrice Evra gave a good speech in the dressing room, a man's speech. He said we had to play, to relax. We have great respect for Belarus but we are the France team all the same.

"We showed character, we were united. If we wanted to finish second, we needed a big second half. We weren't scared but it's true we equalised and then conceded the second goal very quickly after.

"After my second goal, I was very happy that Samir (Nasri) came on and had such an impact," added Ribery.

France moved onto 14 points from seven matches, level with Spain, who were not in qualifying action on Tuesday, as Les Bleus guaranteed themselves second-place in the group and a potential play-off berth.

Deschamps opted to axe beleaguered striker Karim Benzema from France's starting line-up, deploying Arsenal's Olivier Giroud as the lone man up front, with Benzema finally paying the price for a dreadful run of form that had seen him go 1,217 minutes without a goal for his country.

Gael Clichy replaced Evra at left-back, while Paul Pogba and Blaise Matuidi were recalled after suspension to anchor the French midfield as Deschamps made four changes to the side that drew 0-0 in Georgia on Friday.

Sergei Balanovich almost gave the hosts a dream start, flashing a shot narrowly wide of the far post from an acute angle after shrugging off a challenge from Eric Abidal.

Laurent Koscielny then saw a close-range effort deflected onto the roof of the net after Belarus struggled to clear a corner.

France broke the previous national record for consecutive minutes played without a goal by surpassing the 500-minute mark midway through the opening period.

The visitors then found themselves behind just after the half-hour as Lloris allowed a tame Filipenko header to slip through his fingers.

However, Ribery hauled France level two minutes into the second half as he coolly converted a penalty after being brought down in the box by Belarus goalkeeper Sergei Veremko.

The goal was France's first since a 3-1 win against Georgia at the Stade de France back in March, ending a run of 526 minutes without finding the net.

However, Belarus went in front for a second time on 57 minutes as Lloris's miserable evening continued when he let Kalachev's 25-yard strike sneak in at his near post.

The home side's lead didn't last for long, though, as Ribery ghosted in at the far post to turn in Mathieu Valbuena's teasing cross for his second of the night.

Nasri, who came on for Dimitri Payet, then completed the turnaround as he squeezed a shot beyond Veremko from just outside the area on 70 minutes before Pogba capped the comeback shortly after, stabbing home at the back post after a mix-up in the Belarus defence.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

SPORT

Norway’s football clubs to vote on Qatar World Cup boycott

Will Norwegian football star Erling Braut Haaland stay home or play on what fans have dubbed a "cemetery?" This Sunday, a meeting of Norway's football community will decide whether to boycott next year's World Cup in Qatar.

Norway's football clubs to vote on Qatar World Cup boycott
Norway's forward Erling Haaland (L) and teammates wear jerseys reading "Fair play for migrant workers" before the international friendly football match between Norway and Greece at La Rosaleda stadium in Malaga in preperation for the UEFA European Championships, on June 6, 2021. JORGE GUERRERO / AFP

Under pressure from grassroots activists the Norwegian Football Federation(NFF) has decided to hold an extraordinary congress to decide on whether to pass up football’s showpiece event all together.

The games on the pitches in the Middle Eastern emirate will “unfortunately be like playing on a cemetery,” according to Ole Kristian Sandvik, spokesman of the Norwegian Supporters Alliance (NSA), invoking a commonly used metaphor among opponents of Norway’s participation.

Norway, which has not qualified for a major international competition since Euro 2000, is currently fourth in its World Cup qualifying group behind Turkey, the Netherlands and Montenegro. 

So while qualification seems an uphill task, the result of the vote could have an impact on whether Norway and its young star Haaland — one of the rising stars of world football — continue to play qualifying matches. 

The movement calling for a boycott began north of the Arctic Circle when football club Tromso IL spoke out against turning a blind eye to alleged human rights abuses at the end of February.

“We can no longer sit and watch people die in the name of football,” the first division club proclaimed.

Qatar has faced criticism for its treatment of migrant workers, many of whom are involved in the construction of stadiums and infrastructure for the 2022 World Cup, with campaigners accusing employers of exploitation and forcing labourers to work in dangerous conditions.

Qatari authorities meanwhile insist they have done more than any country in the region to improve worker welfare.

“There is no doubt that this World Cup should never have been awarded to Qatar,” Tom Hogli, a former professional footballer turned public relations officer for Tromso IL, told AFP.

“The conditions there are abominable and many have lost their lives,” he added.

In March, a spokesman for the Qatari organisers put the number of deaths on the construction sites at “three” since 2014, with another 35 having died away from their workplaces, challenging the heavy toll reported by some rights groups.

Push from fans
The Tromso call began gathering pace in Norway, where clubs operate under a democratic structure, and under pressure from fans, many teams now say “nei” (no).

According to Sandvik, the fans feel that the deaths on the World Cup sites would have been avoided “if they had not had to build hotels, railways and stadiums”.

Nearly half of Norwegians, 49 percent, now say they are in favour of a boycott, while only 29 percent are against it, according to a poll published by newspaper VG on Wednesday.

The Nordic country’s national squad has already protested conditions in Qatar, but stopped short of calling for a boycott.

Before recent Norway games, Borussia Dortmund superstar Haaland, captain Martin Odegaard and the rest of the team have worn t-shirts with slogans like “Human rights on and off the pitch.”

Other countries, like Germany, the Netherlands and Denmark have also followed suit.

FIFA, on the other hand, argue that awarding the hosting of the World Cup in Qatar has opened the door to social progress.

“We know there is still work to be done, but we need to recognise the significant progress achieved in a very short time,” FIFA president Gianni Infantino said in May.

‘Few successes’ 
While the executive committee of the NFF have said they regret Qatar being awarded the World Cup, they oppose a boycott.

President Terje Svendsen said he thought it was “not the right tool to improve the human rights situation or the working conditions in Qatar,” when speaking at the federation’s ordinary annual congress in March.

According to the NFF, a boycott could end up costing Norway 205 million Norwegian kroner ($24 million, 20 million euros) in fines and compensation as well as lost revenue.

Feeling the pressure from grassroots campaigns, the NFF referred the matter to an extraordinary congress which on Sunday will bring together the eight members of its executive committee, representatives of 18 districts and of hundreds of professional and amateur clubs.

The discussions will be revolve around the findings of an expert committee which, with the exception of two members representing fans, has also come out against a boycott.

“For a boycott to succeed, you need a critical mass behind it, an opposition that calls for it in the country, the UN to put pressure on the
authorities, the business world, the trade unions and civil society to put pressure on it in the long term,” committee chairman Sven Mollekleiv said in a debate hosted by broadcaster TV2.

“Historically, there are few successes,” he said.

Rather than a boycott, the committee recommended 26 measures to consolidate and further the gains made in Qatar but also to ensure that FIFA doesn’t become complicit in so called “sportswashing” — the polishing of a country’s public image through a major sporting event.

Some initial supporters of a boycott, like Tromso’s Hogli, have since sided with these conclusions, although calls for a complete boycott remain.

SHOW COMMENTS