SHARE
COPY LINK

FOREIGN AID

Laos expels Swiss charity director

Laos has expelled the outspoken head of a major Swiss charity for criticizing the government, an official from the secretive communist country said on Monday.

Laos expels Swiss charity director
Helvetas aids traditional farming in Laos, among other projects (Photo: Helvetas)

Anne-Sophie Gindroz, Helvetas country director for Laos, left on Saturday after ignoring several warnings over her criticism of the government, an official from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said.

"We gave her 48 hours notice (to leave the country) and she left Saturday, she is in Thailand now," the official told AFP on condition of anonymity.

"It is not the organization's fault, it is her fault — she didn't comply with the rules of the country she was in," the official said.

"She was in Laos, she should follow Laos's rules and traditions. If not she cannot live here, she has to leave."

Gindroz's Indonesian husband and her seven children were allowed to stay, he said, adding that she must "take responsibility" for her actions.

Helvetas spokesman Matthias Herseldt said the foreign ministry had sent the Zurich-based group a letter saying that "she had been 'acting against the constitution and the law'."

The government took particular issue with a letter written by Gindroz to other development partners criticising Laos's government "and the situation for free speech in the country", he added.

Helvetas has run an agricultural project in Laos since 2001, and also promotes organic farming in the tiny communist nation.

Its "first priority" is to continue aid work, spokesman Herseldt said.

Speaking to AFP on condition of anonymity, a source close to the case said Gindroz "was very involved in land issues and had received some warnings before".

The Southeast Asian country has fewer than six million people, about 80 per cent of whom work in agriculture.

The landlocked nation, long reliant on foreign aid, is now the target of massive foreign investment, with inflows rising from $51 million in 2001 to $13.6 billion last year, according to official figures.

But the presence of foreign investors in Laos has raised concerns — particularly over large land concessions — despite bringing much needed foreign cash.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

IMMIGRATION

‘Unacceptable for people’: Danish asylum centre slammed in anti-torture report

The Council of Europe’s Committee for the Prevention of Torture published on Tuesday a highly critical report on a detention centre in Denmark.

'Unacceptable for people': Danish asylum centre slammed in anti-torture report
File photo: Ida Marie Odgaard/Ritzau Scanpix

The committee called the centre at Ellebæk in North Zealand “unacceptable for people”.

The Strasbourg-based European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) is the anti-torture committee of the Council of Europe.

The report is based on visits to Ellebæk and other detention centres including Nykøbing Falster Arrest.

Both facilities house migrants who are under arrest based on Denmark’s immigration laws (Udlændingeloven), but not for committing crimes.

In the report on Denmark, which was published on Tuesday, the CPT calls Ellebæk one of the worst facilities of its kind in Europe.

“In our view it is unacceptable to keep people in (prison)-like conditions and furthermore with (poor) sanitary conditions and bad hygiene,” Hans Wolff, the leader of a delegation which visited Ellebæk in April last year, told TV2.

“There are a lot of reasons why Denmark is proud of its human rights (record), but when you come to these places and you find such appalling conditions then one might question either the capability of Denmark to do it better or maybe the will of Denmark to do it in such a bad way,” he added.

“It is not compatible with human rights to keep people under such bad conditions in immigration detention centres,” Wolff also said.

Migrants at the two centres are not suspected or convicted of any crime, the report stresses.

One specific criticism in the report is of only 30 minutes’ daily access to outside exercise provided at Ellebæk.

Another involved punishment for use of mobile telephones.

Meanwhile, the use of restrainment was also criticized as potential abuse.

“The Committee expresses its serious misgivings that the application of the prison rules led to a situation where detained migrants who were found in possession of a mobile phone had to be punished by law with at least 15 days of solitary confinement,” the report states.

“Moreover, due to the lack of rip-proof clothing, detained migrants at risk of suicide were sometimes placed entirely naked in an observation room. The CPT considers that such a practice could amount to degrading treatment,” it also notes.

Ellebæk is used to place rejected asylum seekers who refuse to comply with their deportation. This may be due to their fears of persecution or because no repatriation arrangement exists between Denmark and their home country.

Danish authorities are not obliged to act upon the criticism, but CPT has nevertheless called for conditions to be changed or the migrants to be accommodated elsewhere.

The committee has asked Denmark to provide a response to the recommendations within three months.

Denmark’s immigration law, Udlændingeloven, provides for what is termed as “motivational detention” (“motivationsfremmende frihedsberøvelse”) of rejected asylum seekers in such cases.

“I find such measures [detention, ed.] necessary in relation to ensuring an efficient deportation system,” immigration minister Mattias Tesfaye told the parliamentary immigration committee in a written response last year.

READ ALSO: The middle of nowhere: Inside Denmark's Kærshovedgård deportation camp

SHOW COMMENTS