Ruben Brunsveld reflects on state agency spending and why it has got the Swedish press baying for more. "/> Ruben Brunsveld reflects on state agency spending and why it has got the Swedish press baying for more. " />
SHARE
COPY LINK

SUMMER

‘Today’s cheap might be costly tomorrow’

As summer fades and the so-called "cucumber time" or silly season comes to an end, contributor Ruben Brunsveld reflects on state agency spending and why it has got the Swedish press baying for more.

'Today’s cheap might be costly tomorrow'

The first recorded use of the expression Cucumber Time hails from around the year 1700. It was ‘the time of year when tailors could not be expected to earn much money.’ Because ‘when cucumbers are in, the gentry are out of town’.

So what it means is the dull time of year when orders are few, work is slack and tailors have time to themselves.

These days the phrase is still in use to indicate the period of high summer, when the news dries out and the media has to look near and far to fill their pages with content.

It seems that this year the Swedish press has found a story in the expenses and representation costs of government officials and civil servants.

For days the headlines have been dominated by scandals of ministers, director generals and other public officials and their reckless spending of the hard earned kronor, so generously paid to them by the general public.

Christina Lugnet, the beleaguered former head of the Agency for Economic and Regional Growth (Tillväxtverket) was quickly sacrificed in an attempt to appease the media but since that first victory on the battlefield of integrity, it seems the press is only baying for more.

Of course Ms Lugnet made a big mistake. This, however, was not to throw a party for her employees at Stockholm’s Grand Hotel, an obviously questionable choice of venue. Her mistake was trying to cover it up and persisting in her opinion that it was the cheapest option available. One can say many things about the Grand, but never that it is the cheapest option.

But what is really the “cheapest option”?

Sometimes the best price on the invoice is not the best option for the long term general interest and today’s cheap might be costly tomorrow!

A Swedish minister or civil servant missing an informal dinner the night before official negotiations because he/she has to take the cheapest flight out, can have serious consequences for the national interest. Being the only delegation that stays at the cheap airport hotel when all the others are in town can be equally harmful.

So what a relief it would be to hear a minister or director general simply defend the choices they have made. To hear a leader stand up for his employees and tell the media that civil servants are people too.

That they, just like private sector employees, have a right to an employer that treats them with dignity and applauds their accomplishments. That civil servants, like all others, work harder when they are well-motivated and the atmosphere in the organization is good and that this in turn saves on costs. That the money their staff has saved by making cuts and efficiency improvements in the last few years far outweighs the costs of an internal dinner or event to celebrate this success.

But no. Like dogs being whipped, the guilt-ridden politicians put their tails between their legs and make the rules, procedures and internal regulations for representational events even tighter. So that when the next salvo of media shots come they can blame it on their staff for breaking the rules.

There can be no doubt that true misuse of tax payers’ money needs to be addressed, combated and followed by serious consequences. But in the large scale of world events, perhaps it is time to redefine the word “misuse”.

To recognize the public sector for what it is: a sector like any other where most people work hard with dedication, commitment and integrity. But without the bonuses, thirteenth month pay or stock options.

And that in a country that is 4th out of 183 in the Corruption perceptions index of Transparency International, the media should be able to find bigger fish to fry.

Even during ‘Cucumber Time’.

Ruben Brunsveld

Ruben Brunsveld is the Director of the Stockholm Institute for Public Speaking (StIPS), which offers training in Intercultural Communication, Public Speaking & Negotiation Techniques

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

HEALTH

LISTED: The 14 sun creams Spain wants to take off the market

If you're looking for the right sun protection this summer, then you should be aware that the Spanish Ministry of Health has requested that 14 sunscreens be withdrawn because their SPF doesn't correspond to what is advertised.

LISTED: The 14 sun creams Spain wants to take off the market
The Spanish Ministry of Health requests the withdrawal of 14 sun creams. Photo: MYCHELE DANIAU / AFP

The Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products (AEMPS) and the Ministry of Health, requested on Tuesday the voluntary withdrawal of 14 sun creams because the sun protection factor (SPF) that they advertise does not correspond to the labelling.

The results were discovered during a recent trial AEMPS carried out to guarantee that the sun protection factor is the one announced by the manufacturers. The trials focused on sunscreens with SPF 50 or SPF 50+, especially those with very light creams, mists and sprays. The agency chose 19 products from companies in different countries, of different sizes and price points.

Only five of the 19 creams analysed provided protection that was consistent with its labelling.

Five of the sun creams had an SPF much lower than that indicated on their labels, always below an SPF factor of 29.9. These are:

  • Abelay Sunscreen SPF50 from Ab7
  • Mussvital Photoprotector Spray Ultra Light 50+ aerosol from Peroxfarma
  • Eucerin Sun Sensitive Protect Sun Spray Transparent Dry Touch SPF 50 High by Beiersdorf AG
  • Hawaiian Tropic Silk Hydratation Solar Mist air soft SPF 50+ (High) by Wilkinson Sword
  • Australian Gold SPF Botanical SPF 50 continuous spray by Biorius

Nine of the sunscreens were found to have an SPF of between 30 and 49.9, instead of the advertised 50. These were:

  • Les Cosmetiques Sun Ultimate Sensitive SPF 50+ sun spray for sensitive skin from Carrefour
  • Belle & Sun Invisible Sun Mist SPF 50 by Perseida Beauty
  • Isdin Photoprotector Fusion Water SPF 50 from ISDIN daily use facial sunscreen
  • Farline sun spray SPF 50+ 200 mL Very High Protection
  • Babaria Solar Protective Mist SPF 50 by Berioska
  • Seesee Transparent Sun Spray SPF 50+ by Cosmetrade
  • Piz Buin Hydro Infusion Gel Sun Cream SFP 50 High Protection by Johnson & Johnson Santé Beauté
  • Ladival Sensitive Skin SPF 50+ from STADA Arzneimittel AG
  • Lancaster Sun Sensitive Luminous Tan Comfort cream SPF 50+ by Coty

No incidents of sunburn related to any of these products have been reported, however the Ministry of Consumption has started to investigate possible illicit advertising and unfair practices, and where appropriate, will sanction the manufacturers.

According to Weather Online, the UV Index in Spain and other Mediterranean countries is a lot higher than in northern European countries. Indices of 9 and 10 are common, whereas, in the UK, the UV Index rarely exceeds 8.

If you’re looking for extra protection this summer, a new app, UV-Derma has been released by professors from the University of Malaga, which calculates how long you can stay in the sun before burning. 

READ ALSO: Climate crisis: Spain records hottest year in 2020

SHOW COMMENTS