SHARE
COPY LINK

VIOLENCE

Dad seeks video game ban after Norway attacks

The father of a near-victim of July's Utøya island massacre has reported video game Call of Duty to police, saying its simulated lethal violence poses a public threat.

Dad seeks video game ban after Norway attacks
Photo: John Pastor (File)

In his internet “manifesto”, confessed bomber and mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik said he used games like Call of Duty to hone the skills he needed to gun down defenceless teenage members of the Labour Party’s youth wing. Breivik aimed automatic rifle fire at the “moving targets” he saw when the ferry he commandeered while wearing police garb pulled in to Utøya’s pier.

Leaving Utøya that day on the same ferry was Jannike, daughter of Svein Olaf Olsen, the man filing the complaint against the distributors of the US-made game in an attempt to block its sale in Norway. He singled out Call of Duty because of one its “adventure figures” — a killer in disguise — and a scene in which “the terrorist goes undercover to kill as many people as possible as they stand in line at an airport,” Olsen told The Local.

Olsen has crusaded against violent films and games since the 1980s, when he travelled abroad to stem the tide of such products before they reached Norway. He said Call of Duty isn’t the bloodiest but it is “perceived and presented as merely an adventure”.

“I wish to use the law to regulate what one has the right to do about antisocial behaviour in a modern democratic society,” Olsen said.

The father whose daughter crossed paths with Breivik said he hopes to curtail violence as entertainment, a task made more urgent by the gunman's massacre. A bomb attack in Oslo left eight dead before Breivik made his way to Utøya where he killed a further 69 people.

A former Aftenposten newspaper journalist, Olsen has a successful track record. He campaigned successfully in the 1980s against violent films: in 1983, the distribution of extremely violent videos was outlawed. In 1985, Norwegian distributors were fined, and he believes the precedent might help his cause.

Now a shipping-industry consultant, Olsen said he again hopes to make a difference.

“It’ll be exciting to see if this game is affected by any laws,” Olsen said, although he admitted his lawyer wasn’t sure there was a law that might compel police to act on the complaint.

In the wake of the Utøya massacre of July 22nd 2011, police asked the makers of World of Warcraft for help finding Breivik’s online opponents. Norway’s most notorious confessed killer admitted he often went online to studiously play games that mimic close-quarters warfare.

“There's no doubt he was familiar with computer games and spent a lot of time on them,” police lawyer Paal-Frederik Hjort Kraby told TV2.

Some Norwegian retailers temporarily pulled World of Warcraft, Call of Duty, Counter-Strike: Source, Homefront and Sniper: Ghost Warrior from store shelves upon hearing of a link between Norway’s worst peacetime mass killing and some of the games they sold. 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

POLICE

French government to rewrite controversial Article 24 of security bill

French MPs will completely rewrite the contentious Article 24 of the security bill that restricts the publication of images of police, which caused thousands to take to the streets in protest across France this weekend.

French government to rewrite controversial Article 24 of security bill
Christophe Castaner, former French interior minister and current parliamentary president of the ruling party La République en Marche, speaks to journalists on November 30th. Photo: AFP

“We propose a complete rewriting of Article 24,” said Christophe Castaner, Parliamentary President of the ruling party La République en Marche and former interior minister.

Castaner, who held a press conference on Monday afternoon after President Emmanuel Macron summoned ministers to an emergency summit, said the government had “taken note” of the public opinion’s “incomprehension” of the text in question.

READ ALSO Aujourd'hui: What's happening in France on Monday 

France's controversial security law proposal – which was passed in the lower house of parliament last week but still faces legislative hurdles – has caused uproar across the country and saw hundreds of thousands protesters take to the streets in several French cities on Saturday.

Article 24, the most controversial part of the text, would criminalise publishing (either by journalists or on social media) images of on-duty police, if there is manifest intent to harm their “physical or psychological integrity”.

Journalists groups and international NGOs say the vague wording of the Article is open to abuse.

“The misunderstandings raised by Article 24 require that we take the time to discuss this point again,” Castaner said, as he refuted critics' claims that the bill would limit press freedom by making it more difficult to film police.

“As legislators, we must be the guarantors of fundamental rights and freedoms, first and foremost, of course, freedom of expression and freedom of the press,” Castaner said.

“Article 24 is pursuing two objectives, one of them being to better protect police officers. . .The other objective of article 24 is to preserve press freedom, whether it concerns journalists. . . or citizens.”

But several rights organisations have called for the government to withdraw the article in question, a call that gained strength after a French media published a video of three police officers beating up a music producer in Paris last week. This came shortly after police violently cleared a migrant camp set up in protest at Place de la République, in the heart of Paris.

Macron called cabinet ministers and parliamentary leaders to a crisis meeting on Monday to rapidly produce “suggestions to re-establish confidence” between the police and the population.

The rewriting will be done by the three majority groups in the French parliament – LREM, MoDem and Agir.

SHOW COMMENTS